- Sep 6, 2013
- 2,312
- 1,573
I hope the person who wins the lotto is someone really deserving and in need.
Ain't nobody in need of 1.3 bil
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope the person who wins the lotto is someone really deserving and in need.
I do.Ain't nobody in need of 1.3 bil
Ain't nobody in need of 1.3 bil
Ain't nobody in need of 1.3 bil
Inside the mattress.Where do you even keep All that money? You can't just pull up to Chase and deposit 1B into your checking account...lol
Not if there was multiple winners...Crazy thing about the 1.3 billion jackpot.
If a super rich guy were to buy every possible combination for $584 million, he'd still gain money.
Where do you even keep All that money? You can't just pull up to Chase and deposit 1B into your checking account...lol
Its 803M BEFORE taxes. Minus federal tax minus state tax minus other debts. You almost always end up with less than half of the "advertised estimated total"( which is what you would get if you took the annuity) You get more for taking the annuity because it accounts for inflation.Like the government is going to throw away 1.3 billion before taxes away like that (I read somewhere is ~803 million after taxes if you take the lump sum) to the winner of a ticket. This powerball thing is crazy.
This is NOT smart. Sure you could set up a blind trust and have the trustee claim the prize on your behalf. The problem is that by setting up that trust a trustee has to be named. And if the trustee is NOT you(in order to stay anonymous... somewhat) that means that you are handing over complete control over your money to someone else. Control to spend and make investments among other things on behalf of the TRUST. And in many states it is difficult to have a trust revoked or amended.Nah. Have a shell company claim it for me. Only my lawyer or financial advisors name will be public. People wont care that much to dig deep to find out who won. Well maybe Anonymous. But the average joe just gon shrug it off
This is NOT smart. Sure you could set up a blind trust and have the trustee claim the prize on your behalf. The problem is that by setting up that trust a trustee has to be named. And if the trustee is NOT you(in order to stay anonymous... somewhat) that means that you are handing over complete control over your money to someone else. Control to spend and make investments among other things on behalf of the TRUST. And in many states it is difficult to have a trust revoked or amended.Nah. Have a shell company claim it for me. Only my lawyer or financial advisors name will be public. People wont care that much to dig deep to find out who won. Well maybe Anonymous. But the average joe just gon shrug it off
Not to mention that fact that we live in the internet/social media age. All it would take is 1 smart person to figure out who the beneficiaries of the trusts are and voila, despite your hardest efforts, your name is out there anyway. The only difference is you NO LONGER CONTROL YOUR OWN MONEY!!!!!!
Besides, if you are a young person, you would be an absolute idiot to take the lump sum. At this prize level you are leaving 300M on the table.Might as well take the annuity and get paid a graduated annuity that starts out at 13-15M and by year 30 you are getting 55-60M/year. At least this way you learn how to manage that much money first.
Also, little known fact, by law, you still have the right to change your mind and take the lump sum for a certain amount of time AFTER accepting the annuity.It differs in each state but its usually about up to 1 year afterwards. So take the annuity, ball out for a year and then switch to the lump sum when no one cares anymore. Thats the best way to go.
UNLESS you live in a state where you can remain anonymous(DE, KS, MD, ND, OH) So if you live near one of these states' lines go pick up a lottery ticket there.
This.This is NOT smart. Sure you could set up a blind trust and have the trustee claim the prize on your behalf. The problem is that by setting up that trust a trustee has to be named. And if the trustee is NOT you(in order to stay anonymous... somewhat) that means that you are handing over complete control over your money to someone else. Control to spend and make investments among other things on behalf of the TRUST. And in many states it is difficult to have a trust revoked or amended.Nah. Have a shell company claim it for me. Only my lawyer or financial advisors name will be public. People wont care that much to dig deep to find out who won. Well maybe Anonymous. But the average joe just gon shrug it off
Not to mention that fact that we live in the internet/social media age. All it would take is 1 smart person to figure out who the beneficiaries of the trusts are and voila, despite your hardest efforts, your name is out there anyway. The only difference is you NO LONGER CONTROL YOUR OWN MONEY!!!!!!
Besides, if you are a young person, you would be an absolute idiot to take the lump sum. At this prize level you are leaving 300M on the table.Might as well take the annuity and get paid a graduated annuity that starts out at 13-15M and by year 30 you are getting 55-60M/year. At least this way you learn how to manage that much money first.
Also, little known fact, by law, you still have the right to change your mind and take the lump sum for a certain amount of time AFTER accepting the annuity.It differs in each state but its usually about up to 1 year afterwards. So take the annuity, ball out for a year and then switch to the lump sum when no one cares anymore. Thats the best way to go.
UNLESS you live in a state where you can remain anonymous(DE, KS, MD, ND, OH) So if you live near one of these states' lines go pick up a lottery ticket there.
who said a trust? I said a company. Create an LLC, let that claim it, the rep that speaks at the press conference doesn't control the money or investments. Peace of cake. You can do that in a half hour on legalzoom. Pass on the annuity as well. Lump sum over all. Pay the taxes and then invest the rest right then. Anything can happen in the future.
why take the lump sum and leave all that money on the table?Yeah, taking the annuity is the potato way. I already explained it earlier in this thread but the ahort answer is always take the lump sum
Because money today is worth more than money ten years from now for a variety of reasons. Like a million dollars used to be a lot of money. Now that's like buy a house in San Francisco type money. With the lump sum, you could invest it and make gains on it now than wait year after year for it to trickle down.why take the lump sum and leave all that money on the table?Yeah, taking the annuity is the potato way. I already explained it earlier in this thread but the ahort answer is always take the lump sum
If you die the money goes to the heirs . So the money continue to come in.Time value of money for one thing. Is there even satransfer on death rule for the annuity payment? What happens if I die?
Lump sum is the far superior option.
You could also look at it this way.
Let's say the lump sum is 100 million after taxes. You can put that all in the bank and assume you only have 1% interest. You would make $1 million after a year.
Now if you took the annuity and lets say you only receive 10 million a year for 30 years. You put that 10 million in the bank at the same interest rate you would only make $100k.
And that is how the rich get richer. Plus you have more investment options if you take the lump sum.