***Official Political Discussion Thread***

[RustyShackleford]

Jeb Bush is a gaffe machine. Dude has said probably more dumb **** than Trump.

 

[duba169]

Im suprised at how terrible he is at campaigning. Also Walker looks terrible. I feel like Kasich is the most normal candidate but he is getting no play for some reason. I thought Pataki would be somewhat involved too.

It is clear that the republican side wants no part of the establishment. Which is part of why trump and carson and Farina are doing so well.

Democratic side is just boring at the moment. People concentrating on the rmails when the most absurd part of the story is that she had her own server

 

[crcballer55]

Tell me again... Why should black people vote for Republicans?

at MLK being against Black Lives Matter... A clear lack of understanding / lack of care about trying to understand Black Lives Matter, the struggles of minorities and reality of minorities.

How can anyone believe that MLK wouldn't be wholeheartedly against Republicans.

He integrates his church against death threats? (in ARKANSAS nonetheless)

All lives matter?

Treating people with dignity?

What kind of old fashioned cockamanie nonsense is this guy spouting?

 

[RustyShackleford]

Tell me again... Why should black people vote for Republicans?


at MLK being against Black Lives Matter... A clear lack of understanding / lack of care about trying to understand Black Lives Matter, the struggles of minorities and reality of minorities.


How can anyone believe that MLK wouldn't be wholeheartedly against Republicans.

 
He integrates his church against death threats? (in ARKANSAS nonetheless)

All lives matter?

Treating people with dignity?

What kind of old fashioned cockamanie nonsense is this guy spouting?

He is intentionally misrepresenting the message/argument of BLM

BLM is not about putting black folks above white folks.

-First the welfare comment now this.

 

[nomnom]

Would Biden entering hurt Hillary or Bernie more?

 

[rico x hood]

Hillary, easily. They're competing for the same bloc of voters. Then in a Bernie/Biden match up, Biden throws Warren on the ticket. Diddy bop all the way to the White House.

 

[nomnom]

Props to O'Malley for calling out Debbie Schultz for limiting Democratic debates

http://www.c-span.org/video/?327791-5/martin-omalley-democratic-national-committee-summer-meeting

Here's her response:

http://cs.pn/1WXHt4M

Watch the awkward exchange between the two at the end.

She basically says no change is going to happen because it's her choice. Not only that, but she swore to take candidates out of future debates if they take part of ones that aren't the official ones. I mean, people can protest Hillary rallies, but that takes about $2700 to attend lmao.

“Any candidate or debate sponsor wishing to participate in DNC debates, must agree to participate exclusively in the DNC-sanctioned process. Any violation would result in forfeiture of the ability to participate in the remainder of the debate process.”

This **** is so stupid. She was chair of the Hillary campaign in 2008 and the fact that she is limiting debates to protect Hillary Clinton and not allowing Dems to address important issues while the Republicans roll around on TV spouting ignorance and hatred is mind boggling! 

 

 

 

[nomnom]

Hillary, easily. They're competing for the same bloc of voters. Then in a Bernie/Biden match up, Biden throws Warren on the ticket. Diddy bop all the way to the White House.

Sanders/Warren would be a dream ticket, but I feel like Warren would have way more power/influence in the Senate. Congress needs her.

 

[duba169]

Schultz also couldn't or wouldn't explain the difference between a democrat and a socialist when she was on Hardball. Either she doesn't know or there isn't a difference anymore. Either way she looks dumb. She actually evaded the question again on another occasion.

Hillary got people everywhere. She knows where the bodies are buried. Anyone else would go down in flames for having their own server.

 

[RustyShackleford]

Props to O'Malley for calling out Debbie Schultz for limiting Democratic debates

http://www.c-span.org/video/?327791-5/martin-omalley-democratic-national-committee-summer-meeting

Here's her response:

http://cs.pn/1WXHt4M

Watch the awkward exchange between the two at the end.

She basically says no change is going to happen because it's her choice. Not only that, but she swore to take candidates out of future debates if they take part of ones that aren't the official ones. I mean, people can protest Hillary rallies, but that takes about $2700 to attend lmao.

“Any candidate or debate sponsor wishing to participate in DNC debates, must agree to participate exclusively in the DNC-sanctioned process. Any violation would result in forfeiture of the ability to participate in the remainder of the debate process.”

This **** is so stupid. She was chair of the Hillary campaign in 2008 and the fact that she is limiting debates to protect Hillary Clinton and not allowing Dems to address important issues while the Republicans roll around on TV spouting ignorance and hatred is mind boggling! >:  |I  

Pa have you seen Clinton debate? She is pretty good.

I dunno why folk think the other candidates will "expose her"

She was there trading blows with Obama, Biden and Edwards in 2008.

To be honest, Sander and O'Malley are light work compared to that

Hillary, easily. They're competing for the same bloc of voters. Then in a Bernie/Biden match up, Biden throws Warren on the ticket. Diddy bop all the way to the White House.

Sanders/Warren would be a dream ticket, but I feel like Warren would have way more power/influence in the Senate. Congress needs her.

Even as a progressive I cringe at this idea.

 

[crcballer55]

Quote:

 

Props to O'Malley for calling out Debbie Schultz for limiting Democratic debates

http://www.c-span.org/video/?327791-5/martin-omalley-democratic-national-committee-summer-meeting

Here's her response:

http://cs.pn/1WXHt4M

Watch the awkward exchange between the two at the end.

She basically says no change is going to happen because it's her choice. Not only that, but she swore to take candidates out of future debates if they take part of ones that aren't the official ones. I mean, people can protest Hillary rallies, but that takes about $2700 to attend lmao.

“Any candidate or debate sponsor wishing to participate in DNC debates, must agree to participate exclusively in the DNC-sanctioned process. Any violation would result in forfeiture of the ability to participate in the remainder of the debate process.”

This **** is so stupid. She was chair of the Hillary campaign in 2008 and the fact that she is limiting debates to protect Hillary Clinton and not allowing Dems to address important issues while the Republicans roll around on TV spouting ignorance and hatred is mind boggling! 

 

 

Pa have you seen Clinton debate? She is pretty good.

I dunno why folk think the other candidates will "expose her"

Listening to her change stories every time is almost worse than listening to Nancy Pelosi. No matter what she's said in the past, she won't admit she stands for nothing.

 

[nomnom]

Oops. Didnt know it actually said Biden/Warren ticket. Thought it said Bernie/Warren 

I wouldnt doubt that Hillary probably has her debate skills; she's been in the political spotlight forever and has prepared for it.  But I'm pretty sure the current debate schedule is protecting her in terms of having the NY primary registration deadline 4 days before the 1st debate (sorry NY independents) and just not giving the other candidates the chance to showcase themselves on live tv. Also, one of the other debate dates is in the middle of December when everyone is busy holiday prepping and not watching TV.

If you look at DWS' fb, every single comment is about how she's a scumbag and how Obama doesnt even like her. LOL.

 

[RustyShackleford]

Quote:

 

Props to O'Malley for calling out Debbie Schultz for limiting Democratic debates

http://www.c-span.org/video/?327791-5/martin-omalley-democratic-national-committee-summer-meeting


Here's her response:

http://cs.pn/1WXHt4M


Watch the awkward exchange between the two at the end.


She basically says no change is going to happen because it's her choice. Not only that, but she swore to take candidates out of future debates if they take part of ones that aren't the official ones. I mean, people can protest Hillary rallies, but that takes about $2700 to attend lmao.

“Any candidate or debate sponsor wishing to participate in DNC debates, must agree to participate exclusively in the DNC-sanctioned process. Any violation would result in forfeiture of the ability to participate in the remainder of the debate process.”


This **** is so stupid. She was chair of the Hillary campaign in 2008 and the fact that she is limiting debates to protect Hillary Clinton and not allowing Dems to address important issues while the Republicans roll around on TV spouting ignorance and hatred is mind boggling! >:  |I  

Pa have you seen Clinton debate? She is pretty good.


I dunno why folk think the other candidates will "expose her"

Listening to her change stories every time is almost worse than listening to Nancy Pelosi. No matter what she's said in the past, she won't admit she stands for nothing.

Better than standing for racism and ignorance like the GOP

Those their front runner gain? And how did he become so popular.........Yeah that's right, by spewing racist remarks

 

[crcballer55]

 

Quote:

 

Props to O'Malley for calling out Debbie Schultz for limiting Democratic debates

http://www.c-span.org/video/?327791-5/martin-omalley-democratic-national-committee-summer-meeting


Here's her response:

http://cs.pn/1WXHt4M


Watch the awkward exchange between the two at the end.


She basically says no change is going to happen because it's her choice. Not only that, but she swore to take candidates out of future debates if they take part of ones that aren't the official ones. I mean, people can protest Hillary rallies, but that takes about $2700 to attend lmao.

“Any candidate or debate sponsor wishing to participate in DNC debates, must agree to participate exclusively in the DNC-sanctioned process. Any violation would result in forfeiture of the ability to participate in the remainder of the debate process.”


This **** is so stupid. She was chair of the Hillary campaign in 2008 and the fact that she is limiting debates to protect Hillary Clinton and not allowing Dems to address important issues while the Republicans roll around on TV spouting ignorance and hatred is mind boggling! 

 

 

Pa have you seen Clinton debate? She is pretty good.


I dunno why folk think the other candidates will "expose her"

Listening to her change stories every time is almost worse than listening to Nancy Pelosi. No matter what she's said in the past, she won't admit she stands for nothing.

Better than standing for racism and ignorance like the GOP

Those their front runner gain? And how did he become so popular.........Yeah that's right, by spewing racist remarks

so she WAS racist and homophobic?

She's probably also ignorant that she may be sending classified information through a home server too, right? After all, she was just emailing Bill about Chelsea's wedding.

And for the record, I'm not a Trump fan and I don't like most of his policies.

 

[RustyShackleford]

 

Quote:

 

Props to O'Malley for calling out Debbie Schultz for limiting Democratic debates

http://www.c-span.org/video/?327791-5/martin-omalley-democratic-national-committee-summer-meeting



Here's her response:

http://cs.pn/1WXHt4M



Watch the awkward exchange between the two at the end.



She basically says no change is going to happen because it's her choice. Not only that, but she swore to take candidates out of future debates if they take part of ones that aren't the official ones. I mean, people can protest Hillary rallies, but that takes about $2700 to attend lmao.

“Any candidate or debate sponsor wishing to participate in DNC debates, must agree to participate exclusively in the DNC-sanctioned process. Any violation would result in forfeiture of the ability to participate in the remainder of the debate process.”



This **** is so stupid. She was chair of the Hillary campaign in 2008 and the fact that she is limiting debates to protect Hillary Clinton and not allowing Dems to address important issues while the Republicans roll around on TV spouting ignorance and hatred is mind boggling! >:  |I  

Pa have you seen Clinton debate? She is pretty good.



I dunno why folk think the other candidates will "expose her"

Listening to her change stories every time is almost worse than listening to Nancy Pelosi. No matter what she's said in the past, she won't admit she stands for nothing.

Better than standing for racism and ignorance like the GOP


Those their front runner gain? And how did he become so popular.........Yeah that's right, by spewing racist remarks

so she WAS racist and homophobic? or were they all coincidences that she suddenly changed  and is pandering for a political advantage?

So supporting tough on crime bills as the first lady, and being against same sex marriage in the past

And you want to people to label her as a racist and homophobe just on that

At least her and many Democrats have come out said they were wrong or changed their stances on it. At least she was the first have criminal justice reform in her platform

The GOP has doubled down on their racism and bigotry in those areas

The GOP is out trying to passion legislation to disenfranchise black folk, won't take criminal justice reform seriously (they act like there is no problem at all), won't guarantee homosexual the same protections heterosexuals have still, and have been trying to fight back against the same sex marriage ruling though these "religious freedom" laws

Matter-of-fact. YOU'RE LABELING THE GOP RACIST AND HOMOPHOBIC TOO. If you want people to condemn Hillary on that same criteria

-Her evolution of her positions on those issues are no where near the red flag, as the GOP being stuck in the 1950s

And you're delusional if you can't see the difference.

 

[therealrell]

Cut the ********. The only reason she and Bill changed their stances is because it is election season. She coukd give a **** about both groups.

 

[RustyShackleford]

Cut the ********. The only reason she and Bill changed their stances is because it is election season. She coukd give a **** about both groups.

And the GOP does?

 

[OrangeBlueGarden]

Donald Trump is going to be president and I think that's amazing.

 

[RustyShackleford]

Fox

 

[blco02]

Here comes Joe...so the rumor is that Biden is going to run and Obama may endorse him over Hillary in the primary. NT liberals, who would you choose in that scenario? Hillary, an Obama endorsed Biden, or Bernie?

 

[essential1]

Bernie
Biden
Hillary



Not sure it matters who they run, they will win.

 

[Nike Jordan]

As a realist, Hillary is going to be the Democratic nominee. Biden doesn't really have anything going for him.

 

[nomnom]

Here comes Joe...so the rumor is that Biden is going to run and Obama may endorse him over Hillary in the primary. NT liberals, who would you choose in that scenario? Hillary, an Obama endorsed Biden, or Bernie?

unfortunately the president will probably wait til the general election to endorse

But it would basically be Obama on Bidens side, Bill on Hillarys

 

[essential1]

Here comes Joe...so the rumor is that Biden is going to run and Obama may endorse him over Hillary in the primary. NT liberals, who would you choose in that scenario? Hillary, an Obama endorsed Biden, or Bernie?

unfortunately the president will probably wait til the general election to endorse
But it would basically be Obama on Bidens side, Bill on Hillarys

Not sure Bill on Hillary's side moves the needle for her.


Whereas if Obama endorsed Hillary over Biden... Biden would be done for.

 

[crcballer55]

 

Cut the ********. The only reason she and Bill changed their stances is because it is election season. She coukd give a **** about both groups.

And the GOP does?

How come all of your posts are just dodges? Just like Hillary, not addressing the actual issue.

At what point would you jump ship from a candidate? You've been riding with her more than people in her own party. I really hope you're at least on the payroll. At lease Bernie is consistent and has integrity with what he believes.