VinMillerHearn58
formerly lakersreppa008
- May 5, 2006
- 15,240
- 3,864
Boston could have easily stepped in and offered something 10x better than what NO offered. Boston has so many assets. Ainge 
**LA LAKERS THREAD** Sitting on 17! 2023-2024 offseason begins
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by licensed to ball,
- Start date
- Jan 3, 2011
- 18,782
- 10,183
Boston could have easily stepped in and offered something 10x better than what NO offered. Boston has so many assets. Ainge
Ainge like Mitch wasn't willing to give up a ton of assets for a rental.
Boston I see making a move now for Jimmy Butler.
- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,864
- 129,184
Or maybe Ainge and Stevens just want nothing to do with Boogie.
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,040
- 85,631
Only Ingram and picks...idk man. Seems like a goof to me now.
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,384
- 40,874
Where's this reporting ?
- May 17, 2007
- 25,150
- 23,975
If the Pelicans offered a poo poo platter and the lakers offered a legit offer that didn't get accepted how is it a bad look for Mitch & Jim? Lol.
Boogie is a head case who is up for all the $$$ next season but u get the chance to move BI for a top 10 player you have to do it imo. Chances of BI getting close to that level are low. Still, maybe the lakers are just using this rumor to push BI & show they have faith in him. Idk.
Boogie is a head case who is up for all the $$$ next season but u get the chance to move BI for a top 10 player you have to do it imo. Chances of BI getting close to that level are low. Still, maybe the lakers are just using this rumor to push BI & show they have faith in him. Idk.
Last edited:
VinMillerHearn58
formerly lakersreppa008
- May 5, 2006
- 15,240
- 3,864
Come on man, it most likely wasn't just Ingram and picks. It would have to be Ingram + a combo of JC/DLo/Julius plus a filler and picks. Would you have pulled the trigger on that?
- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,864
- 129,184
Yeah obviously Sacramento is wanting to tank this year to keep their pick and hopefully not pick swap with Philly.
- Apr 24, 2006
- 18,754
- 13,107
I wouldn't doubt many GMs don't want cousins because of his character and on court antics
- Mar 5, 2008
- 3,294
- 801
It wasnt just Ingram and picks bro lol
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,040
- 85,631
Seems that it was from what I've seen and it makes sense seeing as the Kings are bottoming out. They may very well be worse than us now and out tank us. All bad.
- May 8, 2013
- 3,234
- 1,391
Whip working on that trade machine right now
- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,864
- 129,184
5.5 games is a pretty good margin, but who knows.
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,040
- 85,631
None of the legit reporters are saying any other legit piece besides Ingram was in the deal. I'm pretty sure if D'Lo or Randle were on the table as well somebody would have said so by now.
- Jul 9, 2006
- 7,408
- 3,904
what picks do we even have it can't be just Ingram and picks. Probably wanted Clarkson and Randle
Last edited:
- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,864
- 129,184
It's all a moot point because the Lakers didn't have the expiring contracts and picks that the Kings were looking for.
- Mar 24, 2001
- 44,833
- 66,536
I expect the kings to go on a run like when a coach gets fired and then come back to earth
- Apr 24, 2006
- 18,754
- 13,107
Our FO probably wanted a core of Cousins, BI and Dlo
- Jan 3, 2011
- 18,782
- 10,183
EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- Apr 3, 2012
- 46,208
- 23,878
Eh we have a chance at getting Boogie at 2018 anyway
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,040
- 85,631
200 million reasons says no we don't.
- May 17, 2007
- 25,150
- 23,975
Please. There was no way Sac was trading Boogie to the lakers. Lakers offer would have had to been significantly better than other teams to get boogie traded in division.
The Kings turned down a package involving Drummond for Boogie lol that entire front office should be burned down.
The Kings turned down a package involving Drummond for Boogie lol that entire front office should be burned down.
Last edited:
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,040
- 85,631
Jose, Nick Young?
- Jan 3, 2011
- 18,782
- 10,183
New Orleans being a small market and already committed to a huge long term contract with AD and them needing to resign JRue Holiday makes Boogie staying there unlikely.
EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- Apr 3, 2012
- 46,208
- 23,878
Who knows?
I know for sure that having Boogie for a season and a half wouldn't even make us automatic championship contenders even with our "core" right now (assuming if Lakers FO only wanted to trade Ingram).
