***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- 11,996
- 3,286
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
I didn't make that argument--you made that up.
Someone asked how could Bernie beat Trump if he couldn't beat Biden. I pointed out reasons that he didn't beat Biden but could still beat Trump.
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
- 17,264
- 27,199
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2012
you didn't point out anything. You just claimed a handful of states were swing states that are not and ignored the actual swing states that Bernie got crushed in (Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan).
Once again there is no better pairing than you and disingenuous arguments.
- 150,473
- 201,164
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 11,996
- 3,286
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
Again, you brought up the "better to face Trump" narrative. The discussion was how could Bernie beat Trump if he didn't be Biden.
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
You are really a piece of work
So you really want to act like you were not peddling the argument that Bernie has a better chance against Trump for damn near all of the primary.
Even after he got waxed in the primary.
- 11,996
- 3,286
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
What are you talking about? Did you read the initial question posted?
Seems you saw swing states and chimed in thinking I was making a point I wasn't.
Biden's performance on Super Tuesday is a large reason why he won the primary.
That, alone, is not enough to say that Bernie would have no chance to beat Trump simply because he lost the Primary to Biden. That was the discussion.
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,400
- 90,125
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
Did Delk moisturize his legs for that clip?
- 11,996
- 3,286
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
We are talking about the current discussion.
It seems you realize we were on a different topic so now you want to go back to my comments during the primary
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
Even your argument here made no sense. Nothing in Bernie's primary performance says he is better suited to take on Trump. The evidence your pointed too was flimsy.
So even looking at what you said today, your are full of ****.
- 31,417
- 65,440
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2018
this ironically pops up as i'm stretching to bring in my jeans 
.
.
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
Yep, he rubbed some leftover Land O'Lakes butter on his knees to lubricate them.
- 11,996
- 3,286
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
Didn't say he was better suited.
I said that the mere fact that Biden beat him in the primary doesn't mean that Bernie couldn't defeat Trump in the general.
You want to change the topic. . .
- 17,264
- 27,199
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2012
His entire premise is ******* stupid as usual. "Bernie would have a better shot because people would be more energized, but please ignore the fact that they were not energized by him enough to vote for him in the primaries so he got absolutely smoked, twice"
- 150,473
- 201,164
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- 11,996
- 3,286
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
Again, you made up the "better shot" rhetoric.
Amazing how y'all create an argument and then argue against it.
Everyone can go back and see how the convo started. The entire "better suited" narrative is completely made up.
At least
RustyShackleford
admits he is bringing up stuff from the primary instead of the current discussion.You really made up an entire quote
Remarkable
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
This was the comment you responded too...
Based Jesus is clearly asking why do people think Bernie has a better chance against Trump, given his primary lost. This want started it all.
Then you responded...
Making an argument that clearly ignores that the fact that Biden beat Bernie in more swing states, the states that will actually decide this election.
So I am not changing a damn.
Based Jesus
was clearly asking why people think what a dude Biden beat would perform better against Trump.So who is really changing the subject here?
Last edited:
- 31,417
- 65,440
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2018
Bernie had a better public perception to him, especially amongst ppl in my age. Had it came down to him & Trump in 2016, I don't thing that Donald would be president rn.
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
******* ******** you pathetic troll. I didn't do anything close to that.Again, you made up the "better shot" rhetoric.
Amazing how y'all create an argument and then argue against it.
Everyone can go back and see how the convo started. The entire "better suited" narrative is completely made up.
At least
You really made up an entire quote
Remarkable
- 17,264
- 27,199
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2012
- 11,996
- 3,286
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
This was the comment you responded too...
Based Jesus is clearly asking why do people think Bernie has a better chance against Trump, given his primary lost. This want started it all.
Then you responded...
Making an argument that clearly ignores that the fact that Biden beat Bernie in more swing states, the states that will actually decide this election.
So I am not changing a damn.
So who is really changing the subject here.
How does that question by
Based Jesus
ask who is better suited? It simply asks, how can Bernie win if he couldn't even beat Biden. I explained how losing to Biden in the primary doesn't necessarily mean Bernie would lose to Trump in a general.
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
There would be no Comey letter if Bernie was the nominee. That is the strongest argument for Bernie being able to defeat Trump.
Everything else is conjecture because at the end of the day he got washed in the 2016 primary as well. And public perception among the age group with the lowest turnout rates doesn't say that much.
- 11,339
- 5,551
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2013
Out of all the wild things that have happened the past decade or so, this is the one that I know, if I told my 12 year old self- he would not believe it or even remotely consider it; I'd probably go full-Karen on my adult self
Didn't imagine my nephews and nieces would grow up knowing him as a cartoonish uncle tom that sells sneakers
