***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- 14,824
- 35,832
This.
- 14,824
- 35,832
cubanref
Supporter
- 5,194
- 6,024
From what I've learned is the FBI only asks more questions ... They don't actually get to the bottom of things. Just a waste of time.
- 14,824
- 35,832
I support the Wall, and I support another Wall between the US and Canada. Gotta quarantine the crazies.
- 1,239
- 583
This was all planned ... The only way to limit the scope was to deflect ... Catch up, I told you about this already ...
Everyone knows that asking questions is no way to get to the bottom of things.
- 24,952
- 23,299
cubanref
Supporter
- 5,194
- 6,024
- 14,824
- 35,832
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ns-years-ago-republicans-dismissed-those-too/
The American Bar Association had concerns about Kavanaugh 12 years ago. Republicans dismissed those, too
Not such a flawless choice, is he? Kinda explains why the ABA came out so fast in favor of a delay and just supported an FBI investigation into Kavanaugh.
The American Bar Association had concerns about Kavanaugh 12 years ago. Republicans dismissed those, too
Not such a flawless choice, is he? Kinda explains why the ABA came out so fast in favor of a delay and just supported an FBI investigation into Kavanaugh.
- 2,694
- 5,656
It was 'all planned' now 
- 1,239
- 583
No, no, no ... The ABA was pissed that they were quoted by Republicans as proof / support that he wasn't a sexual predator ... Once they realized that the ABA could go down in history as supporting this nominee in this circumstance, they had to come out and update their rating ...
All of this was to get Kav through ...
- 9,985
- 11,421
He said that like he went to some rundown public school. Sir, you went to Georgetown Prep, you definitely had connections to Yale.
- 2,694
- 5,656
Wasn't his mom a judge?
- 1,239
- 583
What is so funny? I literally said Kav was going to submit to a FBI investigation ... I also said that a similar looking individual will surface exonerating Kav ...It was 'all planned' now
Watch and enjoy the ride ...
cubanref
Supporter
- 5,194
- 6,024
Attachments
- 43,425
- 42,998
“But but but this all just came up now??”
- 1,239
- 583
Pick the scenario ...
1) Republicans approve the Kav recommendation on a straight party vote, a day after a disturbed woman made a compelling story out of Kav, with polling overwhelmingly saying that people think avoiding a FBI investigation is not a good look, with Dems kicking and screaming like children, and holding a vote for a lifetime appointment under immense scrutiny, ensuring he will forever be that creep judge ...
2) Republicans approve the Kav nomination, with a theatrical performance by Flakey demanding a FBI investigation, albeit limited in scope, so as to ensure the vote is held prior to the midterms and the needs of the public and libbies are satisfied ...
This is actually a genius play ... Then next comes the existence of a similar looking individual clearing Kav and then the confirmation ...
1) Republicans approve the Kav recommendation on a straight party vote, a day after a disturbed woman made a compelling story out of Kav, with polling overwhelmingly saying that people think avoiding a FBI investigation is not a good look, with Dems kicking and screaming like children, and holding a vote for a lifetime appointment under immense scrutiny, ensuring he will forever be that creep judge ...
2) Republicans approve the Kav nomination, with a theatrical performance by Flakey demanding a FBI investigation, albeit limited in scope, so as to ensure the vote is held prior to the midterms and the needs of the public and libbies are satisfied ...
This is actually a genius play ... Then next comes the existence of a similar looking individual clearing Kav and then the confirmation ...
- 14,824
- 35,832
This is the top Catholic magazine saying this:
https://www.americamagazine.org/pol...ors-it-time-kavanaugh-nomination-be-withdrawn
The Editors: It is time for the Kavanaugh nomination to be withdrawn
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee today clearly demonstrated both the seriousness of her allegation of assault by Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh and the stakes of this question for the whole country. Judge Kavanaugh denied the accusation and emphasized in his testimony that the opposition of Democratic senators to his nomination and their consequent willingness to attack him was established long before Dr. Blasey’s allegation was known.
Evaluating the credibility of these competing accounts is a question about which people of good will can and do disagree. The editors of this review have no special insight into who is telling the truth. If Dr. Blasey’s allegation is true, the assault and Judge Kavanaugh’s denial of it mean that he should not be seated on the U.S. Supreme Court. But even if the credibility of the allegation has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt and even if further investigation is warranted to determine its validity or clear Judge Kavanaugh’s name, we recognize that this nomination is no longer in the best interests of the country. While we previously endorsed the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh on the basis of his legal credentials and his reputation as a committed textualist, it is now clear that the nomination should be withdrawn.
https://www.americamagazine.org/pol...ors-it-time-kavanaugh-nomination-be-withdrawn
The Editors: It is time for the Kavanaugh nomination to be withdrawn
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee today clearly demonstrated both the seriousness of her allegation of assault by Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh and the stakes of this question for the whole country. Judge Kavanaugh denied the accusation and emphasized in his testimony that the opposition of Democratic senators to his nomination and their consequent willingness to attack him was established long before Dr. Blasey’s allegation was known.
Evaluating the credibility of these competing accounts is a question about which people of good will can and do disagree. The editors of this review have no special insight into who is telling the truth. If Dr. Blasey’s allegation is true, the assault and Judge Kavanaugh’s denial of it mean that he should not be seated on the U.S. Supreme Court. But even if the credibility of the allegation has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt and even if further investigation is warranted to determine its validity or clear Judge Kavanaugh’s name, we recognize that this nomination is no longer in the best interests of the country. While we previously endorsed the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh on the basis of his legal credentials and his reputation as a committed textualist, it is now clear that the nomination should be withdrawn.
- 1,239
- 583
O so we respect the Catholic church now? Lmao ... Ya'll can't even keep your hypocrisy to yourselves ...
- 14,824
- 35,832
You and your conspiracies...
The ABA previously gave him their highest grade more than 13 years ago, then they downgraded him because of concerns about his impartiality in 2006.
- 3,042
- 7,175
Let's all keep in mind, that the honorable Judge Bratt Kavanaughty has not yet been found guilty of a crime, although he clearly is.
- 1,239
- 583
We are talking about the most recent downgrade ... It's not a conspiracy, it's fact ... Jesus
- 14,824
- 35,832
They previously endorsed him too, and now they are retracting their endorsement.
Nothing to do with respect; those organizations realized they got conned and changed course. Keep up.
Last edited:
- 14,824
- 35,832
Looks like you're the one with logic and pattern recognition issues.
