- 3,249
- 199
- Joined
- May 28, 2013
And of course..........barbosa.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
read this thinking it was some kind of shot at kobe... too me 10 seconds to remember that nash is on our team
Face of our franchise: out
Other guy on our team w/ MVPs: out
1999 rookie of the year, 2x champ: out
guy w/ a cool nickname: out
catalyst of our bench: out
Swear to god, tell me Nash/Farmar/Kobe/Pau/Kaman isn't at least a decent starting 5... and they're all out.
LOLakers (no Pmatic)
Johnny flynn...carlos arroyo..shannon brown...kendall marshall...delonte west...darius morris...agent zero....beauboux....just throwing names out.
I specifically remember talking crap on numbers in the 40s and being told by someone in Oregon not named Chester that I'm a fool for trashing 40% numbers. Had a bunch of emoticons and giant walls of text thrown at me.Jason Kidd?Doesn't matter?
I've had people tell me 40% is... OUTSTANDING.
The conversation was about someone else, though.
Oh no, you said 40.
Must be AI.
*ponders bringing back the 'Kobe is overrated' thread*
Naaaaaah. I'll be good.
I don't think the ball knows whether or not it's being shot by a guard, a center, a shortstop, or a chef, though.A guard vs a 7 footer? Guards are almost exclusive to 40%, they shoot further than Centers, PF's.I specifically remember talking crap on numbers in the 40s and being told by someone in Oregon not named Chester that I'm a fool for trashing 40% numbers. Had a bunch of emoticons and giant walls of text thrown at me.
*ponders bringing back the 'Kobe is overrated' thread*
Naaaaaah. I'll be good.
Michael Jordan shot in the 40's.
Shaq shot in the 60's.
You followin me here?
Johnny flynn...carlos arroyo..shannon brown...kendall marshall...delonte west...darius morris...agent zero....beauboux....just throwing names out.
I mentioned that positions don't matter, operating with the assumption that it would also go without saying that names don't matter, either.
Every scorer should aspire to shoot a higher percentage, and move the ball.
If Tyson Chandler does that, then every scorer should aspire to do what he does, not necessarily be like him.
That being said, I'd take 10 Tyson Chandlers if 9 of them were offered. The 1 I would reject would be the one that's always injured.
Yes it is.
shaq/any center shooting 60%s job is to run to the paint, get the ball from a guard and 1. score 2. see the double and pass the ball
just like any role playing shooter's job is to run to the corner, get the ball and 1. shoot 2. see the defender closing out and pass the ball
for these guys its easy, the offensive system allows them to get the ball in the spots where they are most effective and score which means they will probably shoot a high %
guys like kobe bring the ball up, face several defenders, need to work to get teammates open looks, counted on to bail the team out when the shot clock is winding down, when the offense doesnt work out he is counted on to create something out of nothing, ect.
thats a lot more than just "run to your favorite spot and wait for the ball to come", so maybe there is a reason after all why high usage guards shoot a lower % than post players
its not like kobe's out there saying "my goal is to shoot40% this game, any more and i did something wrong"he's trying to shoot 100% like every other player, the shots he has to take are harder to make than a center who gets spoon fed the ball (most of the time kobe is doing the spoon feeding)
guess cp beat me to the punch
wait what? if theres a 44% shooter and a 40% shooter why would the 44% shooter shoot less
Oh, I'm not trying to defend Pau; DONNNEEE with him.
And you bring up Kidd's shooting% every time we do this, when it's obviously the least desirable thing about him, and nowhere close to the something I like about him. No, I don't think you can just leave Kidd open for 3 (he was absolutely one of the ones that busted our head from the perimeter en route to their 2010 title), but overall? Yeah, if a team was to rely on Kidd for scoring in order to win the game... yikes.
I know Kobe's shots are created vs Pau's spoonfed shots, but I'm saying, as far as shooting % goes... 44%from a SGis 4% higher than 40%from a PF/C... period.
So yes, given 100 shots, the 44%er is going to make more of them; 4 more, to be exact.
Given that they're at least marginally in the same vicinity, maybe the 44%er should, possibly, consider, if logic crosses his mind at all... shoot a little less. Not 'shoot never', but just... less.
Then ANOTHER angle is that if his percentage is because his shots are so difficult from having to create them... maybe... make things a little less difficult by... and we've never agreed on this... passing on a few of those baseline fadeaway double team shots.
Like, I wouldn't care for 2 seconds if JR Smith came at me like "Well my percentage is lower than Andrew Bynum's because he dunks, and I have to jack up crazy shots."
Well, stop making your shots so crazy, and shoot less of them. Done and done.
Not sure if you're talking specifically from mid-range or the general field, but 40% from the mid-range, especially at high volume is outstanding.Doesn't matter?
I've had people tell me 40% is... OUTSTANDING.
The conversation was about someone else, though.