- 10,459
- 8,935
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
to make his point is his point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So I have to believe in this non-sense to post in here?Originally Posted by Patrick Bateman
You constantly come in these threads to tell us the same thing, over and over and over again.. Son, just stop.Originally Posted by sillyputty
OK...so what you mean to say is:Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I know entertainers are normal people but they have great influence over those that allow themselves to be influenced. Using those entertainers as tools to push a certain agenda isn't something that is so far fetched to me.
"I read some stuff that makes a ton of reaches and doesn't have any substantial evidence behind it. I accept it as fact and try to make arguments that are complete stretches of reality and will grasp at any occurrence to make it confirm to my pre-formed beliefs"
Gotcha.
Whats the agenda DC?
You think all of this is a secret ceremony? Of what? To what? Why? To promote what? To send what message? How? When? Why?
Start answering questions buddy. Posting all this "yall need to look out" isn't doing you any justice. It just shows that you can make any argument and not be held accountable for it.
Originally Posted by Ruxxx
Wow... just... wow...
Its true.
I'm starting to wonder how and why I never hear any of this surrounding white entertainers.
Its always black music thats affected.
Oh well...ya'll love the attention so ya'll feed the flame of circular logic, confirmation bias, the forer effect, and pseudo-scientific nonsensical claims.
Ya'll really take yourselves too seriously if you think the powers that be give a damn about some random symbols that you all draw allegories to.If you have nothing to add, why keep coming back? To tell us how we're dabbling in "pseudo-scientific nonsensical claims?" you already made your point.
So I have to believe in this non-sense to post in here?Originally Posted by Patrick Bateman
You constantly come in these threads to tell us the same thing, over and over and over again.. Son, just stop.Originally Posted by sillyputty
OK...so what you mean to say is:Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I know entertainers are normal people but they have great influence over those that allow themselves to be influenced. Using those entertainers as tools to push a certain agenda isn't something that is so far fetched to me.
"I read some stuff that makes a ton of reaches and doesn't have any substantial evidence behind it. I accept it as fact and try to make arguments that are complete stretches of reality and will grasp at any occurrence to make it confirm to my pre-formed beliefs"
Gotcha.
Whats the agenda DC?
You think all of this is a secret ceremony? Of what? To what? Why? To promote what? To send what message? How? When? Why?
Start answering questions buddy. Posting all this "yall need to look out" isn't doing you any justice. It just shows that you can make any argument and not be held accountable for it.
Originally Posted by Ruxxx
Wow... just... wow...
Its true.
I'm starting to wonder how and why I never hear any of this surrounding white entertainers.
Its always black music thats affected.
Oh well...ya'll love the attention so ya'll feed the flame of circular logic, confirmation bias, the forer effect, and pseudo-scientific nonsensical claims.
Ya'll really take yourselves too seriously if you think the powers that be give a damn about some random symbols that you all draw allegories to.If you have nothing to add, why keep coming back? To tell us how we're dabbling in "pseudo-scientific nonsensical claims?" you already made your point.
DCAllAmerican wrote:
Putty, when Chaka Khan is speaking of the demonic nature of the industry what do you think she is really speaking on?
How cut throat the biz is. The industry is ran by lames who stab people in the back.
The same way people hear artists "selling their souls" means going against everything they believe in. Yall really think people are exchanging their spirits for fame?
Every atheist would be famous then.
DCAllAmerican wrote:
Putty, when Chaka Khan is speaking of the demonic nature of the industry what do you think she is really speaking on?
How cut throat the biz is. The industry is ran by lames who stab people in the back.
The same way people hear artists "selling their souls" means going against everything they believe in. Yall really think people are exchanging their spirits for fame?
Every atheist would be famous then.
�Yall really think people are exchanging their spirits for fame?Originally Posted by cartune
DCAllAmerican wrote:
Putty, when Chaka Khan is speaking of the demonic nature of the industry what do you think she is really speaking on?
�Yall really think people are exchanging their spirits for fame?Originally Posted by cartune
DCAllAmerican wrote:
Putty, when Chaka Khan is speaking of the demonic nature of the industry what do you think she is really speaking on?
Originally Posted by Sleaze Jar Omens
I love VC, I wish they updated more often.
Putty it's weird that someone that knows of the CIA and their treacherous ways is skeptical to mind control when the CIA themselves funded experiments on the subject. And the fact that you disregard symbolism when it's (or I thought it was) common knowledge that symbols, colors, sounds, and various other things are used to push/pull us on a daily basis.
Why are you taking the extremes (Jay Z, illuminati, and hand signs) and using them to make your point? Why not address the things that are documented? Isn't that more your route?
Even with Jay as an example, his realm of influence is tiny compared to others but he's someone with a grasp on a certain demographic of people. Is it inconceivable that he or someone with his level of fame (or any other celebrity - be it Jersey Shore cast members or say a Madonna) could be used to poison minds or plant ideas?
Originally Posted by Sleaze Jar Omens
I love VC, I wish they updated more often.
Putty it's weird that someone that knows of the CIA and their treacherous ways is skeptical to mind control when the CIA themselves funded experiments on the subject. And the fact that you disregard symbolism when it's (or I thought it was) common knowledge that symbols, colors, sounds, and various other things are used to push/pull us on a daily basis.
Why are you taking the extremes (Jay Z, illuminati, and hand signs) and using them to make your point? Why not address the things that are documented? Isn't that more your route?
Even with Jay as an example, his realm of influence is tiny compared to others but he's someone with a grasp on a certain demographic of people. Is it inconceivable that he or someone with his level of fame (or any other celebrity - be it Jersey Shore cast members or say a Madonna) could be used to poison minds or plant ideas?
Originally Posted by Sleaze Jar Omens
I love VC, I wish they updated more often.
Putty it's weird that someone that knows of the CIA and their treacherous ways is skeptical to mind control when the CIA themselves funded experiments on the subject. And the fact that you disregard symbolism when it's (or I thought it was) common knowledge that symbols, colors, sounds, and various other things are used to push/pull us on a daily basis.
Why are you taking the extremes (Jay Z, illuminati, and hand signs) and using them to make your point? Why not address the things that are documented? Isn't that more your route?
Even with Jay as an example, his realm of influence is tiny compared to others but he's someone with a grasp on a certain demographic of people. Is it inconceivable that he or someone with his level of fame (or any other celebrity - be it Jersey Shore cast members or say a Madonna) could be used to poison minds or plant ideas?
Originally Posted by Sleaze Jar Omens
I love VC, I wish they updated more often.
Putty it's weird that someone that knows of the CIA and their treacherous ways is skeptical to mind control when the CIA themselves funded experiments on the subject. And the fact that you disregard symbolism when it's (or I thought it was) common knowledge that symbols, colors, sounds, and various other things are used to push/pull us on a daily basis.
Why are you taking the extremes (Jay Z, illuminati, and hand signs) and using them to make your point? Why not address the things that are documented? Isn't that more your route?
Even with Jay as an example, his realm of influence is tiny compared to others but he's someone with a grasp on a certain demographic of people. Is it inconceivable that he or someone with his level of fame (or any other celebrity - be it Jersey Shore cast members or say a Madonna) could be used to poison minds or plant ideas?