- 3,603
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2007
Originally Posted by nYcHipHopHippo
There's no reason that you guys should be mad from a fan's prospective.
You guys arguing that one and done players are better than players who stayed all four years have a stupid argument. Nobody has said anywhere that in college ball: every senior > every junior > every sophomore > every frosh.
But you can't argue that staying for 2 years, as opposed to coming straight out of h.s. will help most player's games. In college, you actually have time to practice, work on your game, and learn the right way to play. In the nba, you have a crazy schedule, on the road all the time, and you wanna enjoy your millions of dollars in the offseason ballin out and spending time with family and friends.
The main key about this is POTENTIAL. Some kids have a ridiculous amount of potential, but they don't even scratch the surface of it. From a fan's prospective, you want to see kids get as good as they can be. It makes the game more enjoyable to watch.
College ball will also raise a kid's confidence in his game. Anybody who plays sports knows that the mental part of the game is huge. College will teach these kids leadership skills, increase their level of composure in situations, and allow them to grow even more. If you jump straight into the league with high expectations, you get owned in a few games and turn into a benchwarmer, your confidence will be shot. Your coaches and teammates will like you less, and you won't think as highly of yourself. At 18 years old, it's tough to rebound from that. If the same dude went to college he would be morel likely to not get owned right away, and if he did, he'd be more tough mentally to bounce back from it.
I could go on and on about this. Fans WIN in this situation. The only people that lose are the players who don't get to cash in asap.
Winners from this:
NCAA
NBA
Fans < --- (omg we win!!)
Losers:
Players
Why are you acting like college is some machine that you insert a player into and he AUTOMATICALLY comes out better than what he was when he went intoit?
At the end of the day...it's up to the player to put in the work to reach his potential...whether he does it in college or in the NBA?
You want to fix the quality of the game of basketball? Youth isn't the problem. Got a ton of salty older guys in here, weekend warriors or monday morning quarterbacks as they're more commonly known, who can point out all the problems. Kevin Durant, 1 year of college ball, J.J. Redick, 4 years of college ball. Numbers speak for themselves. Sure, you'll have some Kwame Brown's, but that's part of the game. Sam Bowie played college ball, so did Bryant "Big Country" Reeves.
Exactly...I see nobody has even addressed this at all yet.