darthska
Staff member
- 46,573
- 30,915
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
iLLoQuent aka DSK:
I bet good money that the admin that banned you was a different admin that locked that thread you're talking about and just told everyone to cool it down and grow up.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
iLLoQuent aka DSK:
Almost a year back, I posted a picture (no, not porn, Ska) which didn't contain any profanity, but alluded to it...I thought it was all good as long as no actual profanity got posted, but I got suspended for a month. I didn't #%+!% nor complain; I understood why the admin did it. If I thought I would have gotten suspended or w/e for it, I wouldn't have posted it, but regardless it was my fault and I sat out the 31 days, came back and kept it moving. This other NT'er, who is well respected on here and an "OG", posted the same exact pic a couple of weeks ago in the middle of a flame war with another well known NT'er...words were exchanged, it became personal, more people got involved, blah blah blah...the thread gets locked and everyone is told to cool it down and grow up.
No bans or suspensions...who even knows if anyone got warned.
Go figure.
BTW...I'm not here to try and start up an argument with y'all or try and say that you guys are doing a bad job...I appreciate all the work y'all put in to make NT what it is and it's easily the best out of the msg. boards I visit. I agree with most of the rules put in place...but like oo206oo said, I'm just sayin...
Correct.
This wasn't a case of leaving it open to interpretation though, Ska...same exact pic in both circumstances. Same rules in place. Not the same result though...
I knew it.
But everything is open to interpretation, my dude. One of the most accurate sigs on here (and one of my favorite) says 'There are no facts; onlyinterpretations.' I believe the sig belongs to... I think... Craftsy? Either him or Clutchshooter, I'm positive it's one of those two.
But yeah, it's still subject to interpretation, unless it's blatantly and clearly against the rules. But like you said already, it was a picture thatdidn't have profanity, but it alluded to it. That already lends itself to an admin's individual interpretation of the rules.