elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,403
- 195,810
I gave up following Iowa
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I gave up following Iowa
The verbiage/portmanteau term used to describe minorities in the country historically including by the likes of Dubois and MLK
If you wanna take umbrage with it you've got that right. I just don't see the issue here personally, champ
To my knowledge he has not qualified yetLooking forward to seeing Bloomberg get washed in the debate
Dammit. The washing waitsTo my knowledge he has not qualified yet
Is this post directed at me?Let me get this right...
On the one hand, some are quick to remind anyone who'd listen that Clinton won the popular vote. And as such, 45* not only is illegitimate because of foreign election interference, years of racist gerrymandering, and an electoral college system designed, in part, to protect a slaveocracy. He is illegitimate because he does not have the popular will of the people.
On the other hand, some of those same folks want to dismiss the 6,000+ votes cast for Sanders over the next guy. 97% is too close to call, they say, and the 6,000 number more ambiguous than it seems.
Now granted, 2.8 million is way more than 6,000. But either the minute percentage difference and the popular vote advantage counts for something all the time, or it doesn't count at all.
It would be nice to wait for some official certification. But that misses the ways in which these percentages are hardly neutral. Indeed, part of the delay in even crowning a victor is that the results weren't the ones certain interest groups were hoping for. We're missing the ways in which political actors are masturbating to slight percentages to blunt Sanders' momentum. We're also missing the ways in which Sanders is using the popular vote tally to claim legitimacy. But in either case, the numbers are political.
For the record, Sanders won.
Let me get this right...
On the one hand, some are quick to remind anyone who'd listen that Clinton won the popular vote. And as such, 45* not only is illegitimate because of foreign election interference, years of racist gerrymandering, and an electoral college system designed, in part, to protect a slaveocracy. He is illegitimate because he does not have the popular will of the people.
On the other hand, some of those same folks want to dismiss the 6,000+ votes cast for Sanders over the next guy. 97% is too close to call, they say, and the 6,000 number more ambiguous than it seems.
Now granted, 2.8 million is way more than 6,000. But either the minute percentage difference and the popular vote advantage counts for something all the time, or it doesn't count at all.
It would be nice to wait for some official certification. But that misses the ways in which these percentages are hardly neutral. Indeed, part of the delay in even crowning a victor is that the results weren't the ones certain interest groups were hoping for. We're missing the ways in which political actors are masturbating to slight percentages to blunt Sanders' momentum. We're also missing the ways in which Sanders is using the popular vote tally to claim legitimacy. But in either case, the numbers are political.
For the record, Sanders won.
Different like when you say nothing when Trump shows little respect for due process
“But...but... that’s different”
Different like when you say nothing when Trump shows little respect for due process
Yet you make convoluted defenses of due process when a white male conservative sexual deviant preys on an underage girl.
Different like that?
Ok, how about thisYou really gonna just steal aepps20 ‘s schtick? It’s enough having to deal with him saying it continually.
You spose to be the quasi-level-headed one.
Let me get this right...
On the one hand, some are quick to remind anyone who'd listen that Clinton won the popular vote. And as such, 45* not only is illegitimate because of foreign election interference, years of racist gerrymandering, and an electoral college system designed, in part, to protect a slaveocracy. He is illegitimate because he does not have the popular will of the people.
On the other hand, some of those same folks want to dismiss the 6,000+ votes cast for Sanders over the next guy. 97% is too close to call, they say, and the 6,000 number more ambiguous than it seems.
Now granted, 2.8 million is way more than 6,000. But either the minute percentage difference and the popular vote advantage counts for something all the time, or it doesn't count at all.
It would be nice to wait for some official certification. But that misses the ways in which these percentages are hardly neutral. Indeed, part of the delay in even crowning a victor is that the results weren't the ones certain interest groups were hoping for. We're missing the ways in which political actors are masturbating to slight percentages to blunt Sanders' momentum. We're also missing the ways in which Sanders is using the popular vote tally to claim legitimacy. But in either case, the numbers are political.
For the record, Sanders won.
“But...but... that’s different”
Ok, how about this
Different like you clutching your biscuits that people assumed you not being black and calling you white
And you then doing the same thing to tiger posters
Different like that? Better?