***Official Political Discussion Thread***

Is framing of the arguments people in there make are incorrect imo, I have never seen anyone in here have blind faith in American institutions or American democracy.

Think of America as a large house that all groups share. For generations, ethnic minorities have been restrained to the basement, cellar, or crawl space, while the dominant white community got to enjoy the bedroom, living room, kitchen, yard, pool, et.. Civil Rights legislation (past and future) is something that opens up more areas of the house to minority groups. The thing is, some in the white community has a form of counterproductive protest has set the entire house on fire. So now we have a choice, we can just focus on the fact that access to other parts of the house that were blocked off for so long (which is a valid complaint), or focus on the bigger picture that we also have to put out the fire as well.

Because it is gonna burn everyone. This is one of the core beliefs MLK had toward the end of this life. That for better or worst we all in this American experiment together. That the fight for justice must expand beyond demanding access but caring about what you are getting access to.

Getting equal treated means little if everyone is still getting treated like ****. Because at that point you are just trading one bad situation for another.

I come from a country with a majority of black people in the West Indies, the poster that posted the articles comes from a country with the majority of black people in Africa. And we can both attest to the fact that sitting back and watching your institution crumble, elections less democratic, and strong men take hold does no one any favors. That political and socioeconomic systems can still fail black folk even in the absence of bigots and white supremacist.

If everyone in America stopped being racist tomorrow, like if we could really wish it into existence, our economy would still drive inequality, out healthcare system would still be trash, our infrastructure would still be in shambles, and our elections would still not be representative enough.

It is not really about going back to how things were, it is about rebuilding important institutions, going back to a worker and consumer first economic policy, making out elections and people more engaged, and making sure all these things work for marginalized groups, especially black people. It is looking ahead not backward, it about reforming our socioeconomic system to me truly inclusive and democratic.

Not just putting blind faith in a system that has always been clearly flawed in one way or another.

This is legit one of the best posts I've ever read on this website

Disagreements or not salute
 

I assume Hugo Boss is still allowed.

VvadnzD.jpg
 
This is...disturbing



I don't necessarily see anything suspicious with this. It would be helpful if there was an identity behind the setting up of those domains but this looks exactly like the kind of tactics I regularly see in the social media market.
By social media market I am referring to the selling of social media usernames, accounts with large followings, ... but also domain names.
What is described in those tweets looks exactly like advance planning in anticipation of potentially reselling the domain at a later point. It was a reasonable gamble that Trump could get a SC nomination during his presidency and registering "confirm(person)" domains that long ago would presumably cost very little. It's a low cost tactic with a potentially significant profit margin. Groups lobbying for the confirmation of a specific SC judge would be interested in that kind of domain; it's name is short and to the point.

I don't think the registration dates are relevant, what would be of much more significance to me is who set up those domains and ownership changes.
 
He is accusing China of trying to sway the US election because they are targeting specific US business sectors by imposing retaliatory tariffs in response to Trump's trade war that he started unilaterally.
In spite of Mueller's indictment of Russian officials however, Trump failed to raise and condemn election meddling when standing next to Putin. Pretty much the opposite in fact. He then had to walk back his comments but even then refused to fully do so, adding that it could have been anybody.

But here he is fiercely accusing China of election meddling without any real evidence.
If China is meddling by imposing retaliatory tariffs aimed primarily at business sectors with high Trump supporter numbers, then he has to accuse Mexico, Canada and the EU as well because we all imposed retaliatory tariffs in response to Trump's foolish trade war.

I'm not sure what Trump is even complaining about, after all a wise manchild once tweeted "trade wars are good and easy to win."
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ticsNews&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter
Trump accuses China of using trade to target election, threatens retaliation
President Donald Trump on Tuesday threatened further retaliation against China if Beijing targets U.S. agricultural or industrial workers amid a trade dispute, and accused China of trying to sway the U.S. election by targeting farmers.

Trump made the accusations in a pair of Twitter posts as the two sides launched new trade tariffs in an escalating trade dispute.


Beijing said it would retaliate with tariffs against $60 billion worth of American products after Trump on Monday imposed 10 percent tariffs on about $200 billion worth of imports from China.

Trump said China was trying to use trade to undermine him with his supporters before Nov. 6 congressional election.

“China has openly stated that they are actively trying to impact and change our election by attacking our farmers, ranchers and industrial workers because of their loyalty to me,” Trump wrote. It was not clear what statement from Beijing the president was referring to in his post.


“There will be great and fast economic retaliation against China if our farmers, ranchers and/or industrial workers are targeted!” Trump added. Trump won the 2016 presidential contest with strong support from those farmers and blue-collar voters.

In July, Beijing launched a short video in English featuring a talking cartoon soybean vouching for the importance of trade. The cartoon points out that nine out of the top 10 soybean growing states voted for Trump in the 2016 presidential election.

“So will voters there turn out to support Trump and the Republicans once they get hit in the pocketbooks?” asks the bean.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom