aepps20
Supporter
- 42,515
- 90,698
Libs don't care about that.
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
Libs don't care about that.
elpablo21
Supporter
- 106,270
- 195,444
Okay, these dudes have to be doing this on purpose now:
Someone really needs to smack the kufi off Franklin's dome
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,515
- 90,698
Okay, these dudes have to be doing this on purpose now:
I agree, Dims are obstructing justice and need to be arrested for their actions right now.
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,515
- 90,698
Handsome.
- 1,239
- 583
The FEDERAL GOVERNMENT shouldn't, the state government should ... Take a civics class ... Your screwface emoji highlights your ignorance ...So the government shouldn’t be able to tell a woman she can’t have an abortion but the state government can?
That’s not what that means... that’s what you want it to mean to prevent vulnerable women having access to healthcare.
And again, you show your ignorance ... That means exactly what I said it means ... If you offer abortions, you should not receive assistance from the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (see position one above) ... But access to preventive healthcare should be available for those within the confines of the free market ...
- 2,650
- 4,473
Are they trying to make people as angry as possible before the midterms?
It's difficult to maintain this level of energy, but they're making it happen.
- 64,966
- 196,173
For a second I thought I was in the Fools Wildin Thinking They Doing It thread.
Your argument is borderline gibberish.
kdawg
Staff member
- 11,171
- 12,807
Oh, I understood what you said, I’m just not clear why the big government interfering is bad but the state government doing the same thing isn’t?
And the fact that you only think that people should be able to get healthcare if they can afford it says everything.
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,515
- 90,698
Only thing missing was a left hook.
- 64,966
- 196,173
Listen, I don't think the Federal government should be telling white folk they can own own slaves.
But if a state wants slavery in their borders, I think it is ok. That's civics dude (because apprently the supremacy clause doesn't exist)
Conservatives love to hop from the power of the federal government, to states rights, to individual rights whenever it suits them
--But you are right. Anyone that believes the free market is the thing that provides health benefits in America is so lost the delusional right wing sauce that he probably can't be reasoned with. Nearly everyone in America has they health insurance, and in turn their healthcare, subsidized by the Federal government.
Last edited:
- 23,023
- 33,725
Nike Jordan
Supporter
- 33,902
- 81,064
Okay, these dudes have to be doing this on purpose now:
As predictable as dwalk's trolling.
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,515
- 90,698
elpablo21
Supporter
- 106,270
- 195,444
heh
- 64,966
- 196,173
Dudes gonna read your edited version of my post and think I'm outchea with biscuit crumbs stuck to my lips with cheap honey.Welcome home comrade. Beautiful post.
Excellent logic.
- 151,121
- 202,520
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,515
- 90,698
Rusty you have proven yourself as a proud member of the Coalition Excellent post.
- 1,239
- 583
Because the states are able to represent their constituents much better than the federal government and the founders generally intended for a decentralized government of the people for matters like abortion ...
I believe Medicare reform is necessary but is sufficient to be the vehicle for people who cannot afford healthcare ... Things like abortions would not be covered, but something like free contraception I could get behind ...
elpablo21
Supporter
- 106,270
- 195,444
elpablo21
Supporter
- 106,270
- 195,444
- 26,819
- 38,437
Must be nice to be a subject in an investigation and being able to tell law enforcement "show me what you have."
Presumably the declassification will be selective as well.
Speaking of subject, it's not entirely clear to me if Trump could ever be designated a 'target' in Mueller's investigation if currently accepted but judicially unchallenged DOJ memos state that the sitting president can't be indicted.
If hypothetically speaking Mueller's investigation found criminal wrongdoing by Trump, his cause of action would be to write a report rather than indictment.
Presumably the declassification will be selective as well.
Speaking of subject, it's not entirely clear to me if Trump could ever be designated a 'target' in Mueller's investigation if currently accepted but judicially unchallenged DOJ memos state that the sitting president can't be indicted.
If hypothetically speaking Mueller's investigation found criminal wrongdoing by Trump, his cause of action would be to write a report rather than indictment.
Last edited:
- 23,388
- 26,455
- 16,413
- 8,760
Similar threads
