- 14,777
- 35,688
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Ain't this some bulllshhh
Jenner is an idiot and a scumbag for making that comment. Just admit that your wallet was the only thing you cared about when voting for Trump. Clown wants us to believe that she is playing some kind of Elite 6D chess and is taking Trump down from the inside. What tangible results of her being on the "inside" can she point to? That's the Susan S logic talking. Vote against your interests then protest later. Trump has set transgender rights back and this deplorable is talking about an "in" and fighting from the "inside". This is the same type of logic the log cabin Republicans are making for supporting the GOP candidate for governor in Georgia over the democratic.
Of the 11 confederate states (Missouri and Kentucky don't count. Their elected officials never decided to secede) all but 2 directly cite slavery.This made me chuckle this morning
Very low unemployment numbers, a good economy and some butter biscuits will do that.
Very low unemployment numbers, a good economy and some butter biscuits will do that.
Hell even David Duke polled 16% favorability from African-Americans voters in Louisiana during his 2016 campaign.
From the same poll also:
Voters across all racial and ethnic groups believe Trump is setting race relations back. Three quarters of African Americans, Latinos and Asian Americans believe Trump is setting race relations back while a small majority of white voters believe so. Black women (89%), in particular, feel disrespected by President Trump. This is a likely contributor to why African American women voters have had high turnout in recent off year and special elections – witness Alabama and Virginia.
That's a huge number
A new poll showed that 21% of chickens enjoyed being fried in new, non-GMO corn oil than regular corn oil.
Wonder if anyone will ask you for a source. Or what that poll meant to you, specifically.
You don't know who to read a poll. Please learn. You can't take two polls, with different sampling methods, then compare the results like that.Doubled. I think surge is the proper term.
A year after the deadly "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, Va., white nationalist groups are treading cautiously into the anniversary weekend.
The violence in Charlottesville sparked damaging lawsuits against the organizers and a crackdown from tech companies that's complicated recruitment and fundraising efforts, splintering the movement just as it's trying to show solidarity heading into Sunday's "Unite the Right 2" demonstration in Washington.
Jason Kessler, a lead organizer of both events, is discouraging participation by the more hard-core elements of the white supremacist movement, and some are happy to sit this one out.
“These post-Charlottesville marches have no purpose, other than to make anyone who supports white self-determination look like a fringe lunatic,” Andrew Anglin, publisher of the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi website, wrote this month in a blog post disavowing Sunday’s rally. “We do not want the image of being a bunch of weird losers who march around like *******s while completely outnumbered and get mocked by the entire planet.”
Richard Spencer, a key organizer of the Charlottesville rally, is even steering clear and urging others to do the same.
“I know that many have good intentions in going, but a rally like this does make sense at this time,” Spencer, head of the National Policy Institute, which aims to “give voice to the interests of white peoples,” tweeted last week. “I don't know exactly what will happen, but it probably will not be good.”
The long-term effect of the Charlottesville violence on the larger white nationalist movement is still unknown. But the initial consequence, experts say, has been a new degree of internal discord that’s expected to dampen turnout at Sunday’s rally across the street from the White House.
“I don’t know that’s it’s substantially grown or shrunk,” said Keegan Hankes, senior research analyst at the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Project, which tracks hate groups around the country. “What I can say is, since the previous Unite the Right, it is far more disorganized.”
“Every one of these groups is afraid they’re going to be associated with any potential violence, but also be further associated with the violence last year,” he added.
Don Black, founder of Stormfront, a white nationalist website, said the reverberations of Charlottesville — financially and strategically — are still being felt a year later.
“A lot of people have reevaluated the tactic,” Black told The Hill Saturday in a phone call. "I don’t have a problem with Jason Kessler. … But some other people do because he’s a … very recent convert to our side and they feel that … his events haven’t been properly planned."
“Most of the organization leaders who supported the Charlottesville event are not supporting this one,” he added.
The division and infighting suggests a movement still licking its wounds in the aftermath of last year’s demonstration, when hundreds of white supremacists gathered to protest the city’s removal of a Robert E. Lee statue — the largest march of its kind in decades.
The event quickly devolved into a series of violent clashes between marchers and counter-protesters. Amid the tumult, a car sped into a group of counter-protesters, injuring dozens and killing Heather Heyer, a 32-year-old paralegal. James Alex Fields Jr., a then-20-year-old white nationalist from Ohio, has been charged with first degree murder.
Separately, two Virginia state police officers monitoring events from the air were killed when their helicopter crashed.
The backlash came quickly. Numerous lawsuits, still pending, were filed against the organizers, including Kessler and Spencer, who are accused of promoting violence. And the giants of the technology world — Facebook, Google, Twitter and YouTube — also intervened in an effort to cull racist voices from their platforms.
“That’s probably been one of the most damaging things that’s happened to the movement in the last couple years,” said Hankes. “They can’t disseminate propaganda as easily [and] it’s a lot harder to raise money.”
Black, of Stormfront, confirmed the trend. After Charlottesville, his website was frozen for a month, and in December he was kicked off Twitter — an event he called “the great purge.”
“A lot of people depended on social media, and they still use it but it’s always iffy. Their accounts are regularly canceled and posts deleted,” he said. “It’s hard to even find a credit card processor now."
“We’re more under siege than we’ve ever been.”
Kessler had initially sought to stage the anniversary rally in Charlottesville. The city denied his petition, and last week he dropped a lawsuit seeking reconsideration, saying he would focus instead on the demonstration in Washington.
It’s unclear how many people will attend Sunday’s march, which will follow Pennsylvania Avenue from Foggy Bottom to Lafayette Square. Kessler has taken steps to avoid a repeat of last year’s violence, prohibiting shields, weapons of any kind and “non-approved flags,” all of which were featured elements of the Charlottesville marches. American and Confederate flags, however, are welcome.
Torches, another prominent feature of the Charlottesville marches, are also forbidden, given the National Park Service’s ban on fire in Lafayette Square.
“No fire allowed,” Kessler wrote on Facebook in May, a post obtained by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). “We need to forget about the torch thing.”
Peter Montgomery, an expert on right-wing extremism at the liberal advocacy group People For the American Way, said the changes reflect a rebranding effort on the part of some white nationalists following “a real blow to their public relations” with the death of Heyer.
“You had people who wanted to disassociate themselves from who they saw as more embarrassing manifestations — people who come to these rallies holding Nazi signs and swastikas,” he said. “There’s a part of the movement that wants to be a kinder gentler face of the alt-right, but as a result it’s kind-of splintered.”
Unite the Right 2 organizers did not respond to questions posed through the rally’s website. Questions sent directly to Spencer and Anglin also went unanswered.
The Charlottesville violence shone a bright light on a white nationalist debate that was already percolating with the rise of President Trump in 2016 — a victory cheered by racist leaders who see the president as a vindication of their own views, particularly on issues like guns and immigration.
Trump’s inner circle has featured figures like Steve Bannon — the Breitbart News executive who has boasted of using the conservative news site as “a platform for the alt-right.” And the president’s equivocal response to the Charlottesville violence — there were “very fine people” on both sides, he said at the time — only fueled the view among white nationalists that they have an ally in the White House.
In its annual census of hate groups, released in February, SPLC identified 954 such organizations across the country in 2017, marking a 4 percent increase over the previous year and a 20 percent jump over 2014. More than 600 of those were associated with the white nationalist movement.
Anti-hate groups are quick to warn that whatever troubles white nationalists are facing, those political conditions remain. Indeed, a number of Republican candidates with nationalistic, if not outwardly racist views, are running for House and Senate seats this cycle, including Arthur Jones in Illinois, Seth Grossman in New Jersey, Corey Stewart in Virginia and Paul Nehlen in Wisconsin.
GOP campaign leaders are not backing any of them, though Trump has endorsed Stewart.
“In that big-picture sense, Trump’s campaign really electrified and energized white nationalists who had been quite marginalized in American political discourse,” Montgomery said. “He really opened up space for them to move more into the political conversation. And they’ve taken advantage of that.”
Sophie Bjork-James, an anthropologist at Vanderbilt University who has researched the white supremacist movement, agreed, saying “both sides have been galvanized” since the Charlottesville clashes.
“While there is an increased organized response against white nationalism, many in the movement still feel emboldened by the broader political climate and are trying to use anti-immigrant sentiment as a recruitment tool,” she told The Hill.
Hankes, of the SPLC, said white nationalists aren’t bowing out post-Charlottesville, even though they may be rethinking their tactics.
“I don’t think it’s had a chilling effect; I think basically they’re being more careful,” he said. “What was illustrated to me very clearly … last year is they had more to lose than they thought.”
You don't know who to read a poll. Please learn. You can't take two polls, with different sampling methods, then compare the results like that.
By, back in May black support was suppose to have doubled too......
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-trumps-misleading-claim-kanye-wests-praise-/
So to give peddle your nonsense you are gonna have to acknowledge your bigot lord was either wrong then, or you are wrong now.
All you are doing is dumping conservative from bigots in here to make bad faith arguments.
Remember everyone: DWalk gives tacit support to white supremacy, is a cheerleader for bigots, and an excuse maker for vile acts against minorities. He spews vile nonsense constantly
So dwalk31 just slid in a chicken joke to MalcolmNewton
Its 2018 and they still think chicken jokes are a solid comeback
You clearly didn't read the article, it addresses a number of claims, including the one you are makingThe support has surged based on the NAACP's own polls. I did not cite the Mitt Romney numbers that your debunking article cites. So it is as if you created a position for me and then argued against it with an article someone wrote addressing different claims.
Even what you cited shows that the support is surging among African Americans. You know this. It is why the end of your post is the typical ad-hominem stuff against me.
I just can't figure out what this is referring to. I don't think this sentence is literal enough.But I expect nothing less in the echo chamber