The "racist intent" is the part that you aren't explaining. So far, the comments regarding kneeling have been race-neutral. If that changes, my position will as well.
I cited a random example of why your argument is shortsighted. In that above example it would be almost inconceivable that the individual is talking about those countries' white populations as uncivilized in equal matter in spite of him not literally saying "the black population in x African country is uncivilized."
What you're doing is a somewhat clever attempt to sidestep any criticism unless the words are uttered in the most literal form possible. Particularly politicians aren't exactly speaking in absolute literal terms on the regular.
Let me introduce you to this 1981 quote by Republican strategist, former Reagan advisor and H.W. Bush campaign manager Lee Atwater. I don't think the censored word needs explaining.
You start out in 1954 by saying, “******, ******, ******.” By 1968 you can’t say “******”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “******, ******.”
There are many ways to talk about a wide variety of things, doesn't necessarily need to have anything to do with race, without a very literal invocation of whatever the individual is referring to or the point he wants to get across.
In fact, let me illustrate it with an example provided by yourself.
Would it be fair to say that when you have talked about the echo chamber in this thread, you are referring to the posters with more liberal views rather than all posters in this thread in equal manner including yourself, Ninjahood, Inthehallway, ...
I don't seem to recall you literally saying "the echo chamber perpetuated by members a, b, c, ..."
No regular poster read that and thought "well he must be talking about all posters" because you didn't write your point in its most literal form.