***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- 3,903
- 5,011
No, it's not. When Obama took over, the economy had gone to ****. After a few years he came to power, the arrows started pointing up and have been pointing up ever since. Obama fixed the economy. Trump inherited a very healthy economy that was already fixed. And it will take a few years for his atrocious policies to ruin it again.
elpablo21
Supporter
- 106,187
- 195,213
- 11,997
- 3,286
The question, at least how I viewed it, wasn't who is responsible for the numbers. The question was what the numbers show.
You have one person saying "why are we still talking about Obama" and you are saying Obama is responsible for the numbers...
Either way, the question of whether they show strength is the important one. Due to confirmation bias I am sure that if the numbers take a negative turn you will blame Trump for them. And when they are positive it is in spite of him. Typical. Predictable. Partisan.
- 11,997
- 3,286
Generalization noted
- 151,088
- 202,447
- 64,964
- 196,092
You are though
And it is ridiculous for anyone to think that bigots only support bigotry because they get called out on their bigotry too much. Trump being a vile human being is a feature for his supporters, not a bug.
People like you just want to endorse white supremacy without being called out on it.
- 16,542
- 21,133
it's not a generalization though.
- 64,964
- 196,092
Yet when I made a point t to use the given information, even acknowledging top line numbers are good, to show how Trump show not get the credit he is clamining you just deflected.
Typical. Predictable. Partisan. Buffoonery
- 11,997
- 3,286
Your personal attacks aside, this is the reason that he won. Generalizations and character attacks are a losing strategy. Argue policy. Argue effects of said policies.
- 11,997
- 3,286
Literally was... But definitions might not be your strong point.
- 64,964
- 196,092
I made a post about policy and you deflected. Everytime I do you deflect. So please spare me, you are not here for a policy debate.
It is not a personal attack, it is true. You support a bigot and the system of white supremacy. You would do so no matter the tone I take with you. So why should I not speak the truth.
- 32,869
- 81,591
That's how trends work.
- 11,997
- 3,286
Just searched for the policy post you reference. Couldn't find it. If it isn't too much to ask, post it again and I will respond directly.
elpablo21
Supporter
- 106,187
- 195,213
- 32,869
- 81,591
Good news for them is that they'll be able to pick up new jobs working with asbestos.
- 43,425
- 42,998
But...... we made 20 new jobs at min wage with new and improved “you pay yo damn self” health care package! So.... job growth
- 64,964
- 196,092
Cool, right after you post a sociological research paper showing calling bigots out on their racism makes them flip their vote.
- 151,088
- 202,447
Umm ain't they claim they was going broke
- 14,844
- 35,903
Nothing to do with confirmation bias.
Trump's policy proposals and actions will result in negative results that stock buybacks won't hide for much longer.
Good
As long as you know that any tried and true racist looks at anyone who says "I voted for and support Trump" as a kindred spirit
Your little "racism is bad" bromides mean zilch when you're still waving around that MAGA flag
- 11,997
- 3,286
How do tried and true racists and react to the fact that Jared Kushner and his wife Ivanka Trump are Jewish? I'm only asking you because you seem to be an expert on how those idiots think.
elpablo21
Supporter
- 106,187
- 195,213
MalcolmNewton
formerly ironstark
- 2,732
- 4,574
Right hand:
Left hand:
Left hand:
- 14,844
- 35,903
Isn't Richard "peaceful genocide" Spencer dating a Jewish chick?
Similar threads
