- 207
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2002
I think they probably mean no positive nutritional value. Obviously it has calories, carbs, protein, unsaturated fats, etc... which are allconsidered "nutritious". It just has an unhealthy ratio of them. Plus when I was bulking dirty on a steady diet of McDs and Popeye's (alongwith vegetables, chicken breasts, brown rice of course) I put on about 15 pounds of muscle in about 3 months, about 1.5" around my arms, 3" around mychest.Originally Posted by jDOTgDOT
No nutritional value? Then why are people getting so fat off of eating this stuff. There are probably a lot of chemicals and preservatives in the burger but it's not like its made out of bits and pieces of cardboard. And for the most part your body digests this stuff. There's never any scientific data to this stuff. Why don't they have a chemist do an analysis on one of these burgers? Now I'm not for people living off McD's but making strong claims like that with no scientific evidence or reasoning just doesn't do it for me.
Also: For the poster who suggested we do this ourselves... anyone interested? I highly doubt that is a twelve year old burger, preservatives or not. I'lltake it back if I'm wrong of course but I just don't see McDs spending money putting insane preservatives in the bread when regular buns would workjust fine. I mean, c'mon. White bread goes bad after a week if left out in the open.