- 1,334
- 373
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2006
^aight good looks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Turn out i gotta give up breds IVs vnds, fire red IVs ds and $225 for db IVs vvnds what u guys think
Someone offered me DS Crimson Foamposite Pros + $200 for my DB 9's. Fair? Lowballed?
Thats what i figured. The price of DBs will either stay the same or go up, where the price of those other IVs will prolly go down.
DB's are ugly and a disgraced to the Jordan brand, pure "HYPE."
DB's are ugly and a disgraced to the Jordan brand, pure "HYPE."
you're probably glad that Jordan Brand is re-re-reretroing the Bred 11s
Yeah...I wouldn't trade Nerfs or Weathermans for these. But those Galaxy Rookies have definitely fallen off a bit in terms of value since they released, probably cuz of the restocks, so you might have to add a bill or something to make that work. I know I wouldn't trade DB IXs straight up for them.I need a 10.5. Galaxy Rookies for trade straight up is what I've been offering but most these dudes reply with..
"I need HEAT, not GR stuff, HEAT!"
Wth is "heat" to these people now a days? One dude texted me saying he'd trade for nerfs, weatherman, etc.
I asked for his address so I could slap him
you're probably glad that Jordan Brand is re-re-reretroing the Bred 11s
I love retro's and especially the XI's. And let me add this, retros are fantastic lifestyle shoes.
What sticks out the most to me is the initial reactions to XI's. Those were like the weirdest looking Jordan's ever. Most people looked at them the way people looked at 15's, like WTF.11's are the official shoe of hypebeasts everywhere, end of discussion. 11's are forever tainted to me now...
Yeah, the Breds were but not the Concords. But the Concords were not Jordan like to Jordan heads.