- Aug 23, 2003
- 7,122
- 1,149
so i gues El-baradei got officially selected by opposition groups as the man to replace mubarak
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Biggest one yet should be taking place today.Originally Posted by DunkNForce
protest are still going strong?
Originally Posted by GottaBdaShoes
I have a feeling they shut communications down in Egypt so people here in the United States and around the world wouldn't get any new ideas or learn how to over throw their government.
Hmmm.
Originally Posted by Carlos Tevez
Who said El Baradei was some sort of revolutionary? The guy is merely just one opposition figure and nothing more. Within Egypt he still suffers from a lack of credibility. Citizens and politicians (including political parties that are now working with him) have questioned his allegiance to the country seeing as how he's lived outside of Egypt for the better part of the last 3 decades. He's also been viewed as someone who doesnt really understand Egyptians and he has not yet shown the ability to relate to the poorest segments of the Egyptian population. He is 68 years old and returned to his Vienna home last year after the Mubarak regime were able to execute a successful smear campaign against him. It seems to me like he is reluctantly trying to spearhead change in Egypt due to the absence of other Egyptian agents of change. It seems like he wont mind leading the transitional government and help develop a new constitution before bowing out of the Egyptian political scene not too long after.
Also, ElBaradei was the first to point out that this revolt was launched by the Egyptian people themselves and that he had nothing to do with it.
As for him being a puppet to the West, I think this is completely incorrect. Lets not forget this is the same man that was a thorn in the U.S. and Israel's side in his last term as IAEA head as he not only tried to prevent U.S. conflict with Iraq and has criticized the U.S. and Israel for having nuclear weapons while trying to prevent Iran from acquiring them. He also criticized the U.S.'s approach with Iran which led to some increased tension between the Bush administration and himself. Also, lets not forget that yesterday he announced a coalition agreement with the Muslim Brotherhood. How do you think white people feel about this?
Frank has long and strong ties to CIA. His father was infamous, and sadly had a breakdown and committed suicide in 1965. But he was a lobbyist at Patton Boggs and before that an executive at American International Group, a company with ties to the intelligence community and "international trade" most of it in the Middle East and Gulf States
Like I said, he's sucked off power brokers for the better part of 20 years and he plays it safe. He does what is "suggested" to him.Originally Posted by wawaweewa
Originally Posted by Carlos Tevez
Who said El Baradei was some sort of revolutionary? The guy is merely just one opposition figure and nothing more. Within Egypt he still suffers from a lack of credibility. Citizens and politicians (including political parties that are now working with him) have questioned his allegiance to the country seeing as how he's lived outside of Egypt for the better part of the last 3 decades. He's also been viewed as someone who doesnt really understand Egyptians and he has not yet shown the ability to relate to the poorest segments of the Egyptian population. He is 68 years old and returned to his Vienna home last year after the Mubarak regime were able to execute a successful smear campaign against him. It seems to me like he is reluctantly trying to spearhead change in Egypt due to the absence of other Egyptian agents of change. It seems like he wont mind leading the transitional government and help develop a new constitution before bowing out of the Egyptian political scene not too long after.
Also, ElBaradei was the first to point out that this revolt was launched by the Egyptian people themselves and that he had nothing to do with it.
As for him being a puppet to the West, I think this is completely incorrect. Lets not forget this is the same man that was a thorn in the U.S. and Israel's side in his last term as IAEA head as he not only tried to prevent U.S. conflict with Iraq and has criticized the U.S. and Israel for having nuclear weapons while trying to prevent Iran from acquiring them. He also criticized the U.S.'s approach with Iran which led to some increased tension between the Bush administration and himself. Also, lets not forget that yesterday he announced a coalition agreement with the Muslim Brotherhood. How do you think white people feel about this?
Please use your head a bit. Don't mean any offense, really.
He was at the IAEA for ~20 years. You don't stay there by being a thorn in the side of anyone who matters.
Criticizing the US and Israel for having weapons? My response is literally..."and...?". It literally is hot air. It means nothing. It's "safe" criticism that appeals to some people.
While under his watch the Iranian program advanced to the point where Israel and US had to develop and release STUXNET to disable a large portion of the Iranian centrifuges and set Iran back some years. I'm not really blaming him just merely pointing out that he was nothing more than some flapping gums at the IAEA.
As for teaming up with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood ( which is quite moderate compared to similar orgs in other Arab countries), please see (don't shoot the messenger;I'm not a big fan of WND either). Also, from a comment on the article on Marketwatch reagrding the former US ambassador who had the metting:
Frank has long and strong ties to CIA. His father was infamous, and sadly had a breakdown and committed suicide in 1965. But he was a lobbyist at Patton Boggs and before that an executive at American International Group, a company with ties to the intelligence community and "international trade" most of it in the Middle East and Gulf States
Unfortunately when it comes to anything more than speeches and possibly small domestic reform, he just lacks the teeth.
If you've been following Baradei since he stepped down from the IAEA you'd realize he's much more than just a talker. The guy actually knows what he's talking about. Over a year ago he called for the need for political reform and he warned Egyptians that they could not rely on Western powers to initiate change within the country. He said the only way Egypt could become a democracy is through change within and he's been proven right so far. Further, he talked about the need to completely amend the Egyptian constitution. I think he'd know what to do if he assumed power (keep in mind he is a former law professor so what better guy than him to help come up with a new constitution?). I'm not saying he's Egypt's savior, and neither are the Egyptian people. Like I said earlier, he still lacks credibility on the Egyptian streets but at the same time he is more than qualified to be leader of the country. My personal opinion is that he is reluctantly trying to encourage change in Egypt because he does not see too many Egyptian social leaders out there at the moment.
And the real puppet masters with regards to Egypt is the Egyptian military. Since 1952.
niceOriginally Posted by Dame Theory
Yeah, he was flapping gums at the IAEA but if he was such a U.S. puppet then why did Condoleeza Rice criticize him and why did the U.S. oppose his bid for IAEA re-election?Originally Posted by Carlos Tevez
Like I said, he's sucked off power brokers for the better part of 20 years and he plays it safe. He does what is "suggested" to him.Originally Posted by wawaweewa
Originally Posted by Carlos Tevez
Who said El Baradei was some sort of revolutionary? The guy is merely just one opposition figure and nothing more. Within Egypt he still suffers from a lack of credibility. Citizens and politicians (including political parties that are now working with him) have questioned his allegiance to the country seeing as how he's lived outside of Egypt for the better part of the last 3 decades. He's also been viewed as someone who doesnt really understand Egyptians and he has not yet shown the ability to relate to the poorest segments of the Egyptian population. He is 68 years old and returned to his Vienna home last year after the Mubarak regime were able to execute a successful smear campaign against him. It seems to me like he is reluctantly trying to spearhead change in Egypt due to the absence of other Egyptian agents of change. It seems like he wont mind leading the transitional government and help develop a new constitution before bowing out of the Egyptian political scene not too long after.
Also, ElBaradei was the first to point out that this revolt was launched by the Egyptian people themselves and that he had nothing to do with it.
As for him being a puppet to the West, I think this is completely incorrect. Lets not forget this is the same man that was a thorn in the U.S. and Israel's side in his last term as IAEA head as he not only tried to prevent U.S. conflict with Iraq and has criticized the U.S. and Israel for having nuclear weapons while trying to prevent Iran from acquiring them. He also criticized the U.S.'s approach with Iran which led to some increased tension between the Bush administration and himself. Also, lets not forget that yesterday he announced a coalition agreement with the Muslim Brotherhood. How do you think white people feel about this?
Please use your head a bit. Don't mean any offense, really.
He was at the IAEA for ~20 years. You don't stay there by being a thorn in the side of anyone who matters.
Criticizing the US and Israel for having weapons? My response is literally..."and...?". It literally is hot air. It means nothing. It's "safe" criticism that appeals to some people.
While under his watch the Iranian program advanced to the point where Israel and US had to develop and release STUXNET to disable a large portion of the Iranian centrifuges and set Iran back some years. I'm not really blaming him just merely pointing out that he was nothing more than some flapping gums at the IAEA.
As for teaming up with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood ( which is quite moderate compared to similar orgs in other Arab countries), please see (don't shoot the messenger;I'm not a big fan of WND either). Also, from a comment on the article on Marketwatch reagrding the former US ambassador who had the metting:
Frank has long and strong ties to CIA. His father was infamous, and sadly had a breakdown and committed suicide in 1965. But he was a lobbyist at Patton Boggs and before that an executive at American International Group, a company with ties to the intelligence community and "international trade" most of it in the Middle East and Gulf States
Unfortunately when it comes to anything more than speeches and possibly small domestic reform, he just lacks the teeth.
If you've been following Baradei since he stepped down from the IAEA you'd realize he's much more than just a talker. The guy actually knows what he's talking about. Over a year ago he called for the need for political reform and he warned Egyptians that they could not rely on Western powers to initiate change within the country. He said the only way Egypt could become a democracy is through change within and he's been proven right so far. Further, he talked about the need to completely amend the Egyptian constitution. I think he'd know what to do if he assumed power (keep in mind he is a former law professor so what better guy than him to help come up with a new constitution?). I'm not saying he's Egypt's savior, and neither are the Egyptian people. Like I said earlier, he still lacks credibility on the Egyptian streets but at the same time he is more than qualified to be leader of the country. My personal opinion is that he is reluctantly trying to encourage change in Egypt because he does not see too many Egyptian social leaders out there at the moment.
And the real puppet masters with regards to Egypt is the Egyptian military. Since 1952.
I'm sorry that just made me laugh. Like I said before, he might bring some domestic reform and make a few fancy speeches, but when it comes to real action to put Egypt on the proper path, this guy is a joke. No pro-western moderate willing to shake hands and smile at a war criminal terrorist is right to lead Egypt.Also, who do you think controls Egypt's military ? Do you realize how close the collaboration between the military and the US govt. is ?
Whats your take on all this devildog1776 ? curious to know your insight, enlighten meOriginally Posted by devildog1776
this is merely the first act in the first scene....
please quote this in 2 years
Originally Posted by tkthafm
If you've been following Baradei since he stepped down from the IAEA you'd realize he's much more than just a talker. The guy actually knows what he's talking about. Over a year ago he called for the need for political reform and he warned Egyptians that they could not rely on Western powers to initiate change within the country. He said the only way Egypt could become a democracy is through change within and he's been proven right so far. Further, he talked about the need to completely amend the Egyptian constitution. I think he'd know what to do if he assumed power (keep in mind he is a former law professor so what better guy than him to help come up with a new constitution?). I'm not saying he's Egypt's savior, and neither are the Egyptian people. Like I said earlier, he still lacks credibility on the Egyptian streets but at the same time he is more than qualified to be leader of the country. My personal opinion is that he is reluctantly trying to encourage change in Egypt because he does not see too many Egyptian social leaders out there at the moment.
"Egypt doesn't have control of it's people the way we do here." - Joe Biden
I love this guy.