- Jul 15, 2006
- 5,527
- 14
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because there are plenty of boxers both contemporary and in the past that could beat Lee in my opinion....Originally Posted by 18key
Again, wasn't talking about you. Thesimplestlife is arguing your points too, so things might have been crossed a couple times.Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
I haven't done any sort of research? Wow...Assumptions....
As far as the grand scheme and where Tyson fits in? He's not even on my top 20.
1. Ray Robinson.
2. Joe Louis
3. Ali
4. Ray Leonard
5. Willie Pep
6. Joe Frazier
7. Gene Tunney
8. Marvin Hagler
9. Roberto Duran
10. Emile Griffith
11. Jack Dempsey
12. Jake LaMotta
13. Evander Holyfield
14. Tommy Hearns
15. Larry Holmes
16. Jack Johnson
17. Julio Cesar Chavez
18. Ezzard Charles
19. George Foreman
20. Archie Moore
And plenty more better than Tyson...
If Tyson isnt in your top 20 boxers ever... then how is he better than Lee?
Huh?...Originally Posted by 18key
Again, wasn't talking about you. Thesimplestlife is arguing your points too, so things might have been crossed a couple times.Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
I haven't done any sort of research? Wow...Assumptions....
As far as the grand scheme and where Tyson fits in? He's not even on my top 20.
1. Ray Robinson.
2. Joe Louis
3. Ali
4. Ray Leonard
5. Willie Pep
6. Joe Frazier
7. Gene Tunney
8. Marvin Hagler
9. Roberto Duran
10. Emile Griffith
11. Jack Dempsey
12. Jake LaMotta
13. Evander Holyfield
14. Tommy Hearns
15. Larry Holmes
16. Jack Johnson
17. Julio Cesar Chavez
18. Ezzard Charles
19. George Foreman
20. Archie Moore
And plenty more better than Tyson...
If Tyson isnt in your top 20 boxers ever... then how is he better than Lee?
Quick question, what do you think Tyson would do if Lee were to attack his lower body with kicks?Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
Illogical on what basis? That we've seen tyson, and not lee? I was saying that I was taking Tyson based off of that; I was simply just trying to re-emphasize that Lee has not really fought professionals. At least we have concrete footage of tyson fighting professional boxers.Originally Posted by 18key
Your first argument is illogical.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
you guys are illogical. How are you going try to make it sound like it's dumb of me to take tyson because I've actually SEEN him fight, while no one (me, included) has seen lee fight, and yet still (w/o any real evidence of ability) takes lee to win this fight. The sad thing is, I probably know about lee than you clowns.
Also, I have seen videos of him fighting. Real fights; tournament fights. Google is your friend. If you put any effort into it, you can find a video.
I did a research project for college on Lee. I know everything the internet can give me on him. I wont claim to know more than you, but I definitely know a lot.
Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
Because there are plenty of boxers both contemporary and in the past that could beat Lee in my opinion....Originally Posted by 18key
Again, wasn't talking about you. Thesimplestlife is arguing your points too, so things might have been crossed a couple times.Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
I haven't done any sort of research? Wow...Assumptions....
As far as the grand scheme and where Tyson fits in? He's not even on my top 20.
1. Ray Robinson.
2. Joe Louis
3. Ali
4. Ray Leonard
5. Willie Pep
6. Joe Frazier
7. Gene Tunney
8. Marvin Hagler
9. Roberto Duran
10. Emile Griffith
11. Jack Dempsey
12. Jake LaMotta
13. Evander Holyfield
14. Tommy Hearns
15. Larry Holmes
16. Jack Johnson
17. Julio Cesar Chavez
18. Ezzard Charles
19. George Foreman
20. Archie Moore
And plenty more better than Tyson...
If Tyson isnt in your top 20 boxers ever... then how is he better than Lee?
Heck I'd even say Juan Manuel Marquez would beat him...
no idea, really. but consider my question: what do you think lee would do if tyson attacked him punches? sure he could dodge a few, but what iftyson connected with one?Originally Posted by ItsGettinHot
Quick question, what do you think Tyson would do if Lee were to attack his lower body with kicks?Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
Illogical on what basis? That we've seen tyson, and not lee? I was saying that I was taking Tyson based off of that; I was simply just trying to re-emphasize that Lee has not really fought professionals. At least we have concrete footage of tyson fighting professional boxers.Originally Posted by 18key
Your first argument is illogical.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
you guys are illogical. How are you going try to make it sound like it's dumb of me to take tyson because I've actually SEEN him fight, while no one (me, included) has seen lee fight, and yet still (w/o any real evidence of ability) takes lee to win this fight. The sad thing is, I probably know about lee than you clowns.
Also, I have seen videos of him fighting. Real fights; tournament fights. Google is your friend. If you put any effort into it, you can find a video.
I did a research project for college on Lee. I know everything the internet can give me on him. I wont claim to know more than you, but I definitely know a lot.
As far as HW? Or in the grand scheme of boxing? I don't consider Jones JR. a HW let alone a great heavyweight...Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
18key wrote:
Where do you have him then? We both know he's not #1.Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
18key wrote:
SneakerHeathen wrote:
Top 5 boxer? Tyson top 5?
Lmao another dude who committed e-suicide and let it be known that he has no idea what he's talking about.
Tyson isn't top 5, p4p or HW.....
Ali, Robinson, Jones Jr., Joe Louis > Tyson.
abeautifulhaze wrote:
Just you classifying Bruce a "martial arts movie star" proves you don't know what you're talking about.
Dude developed his own fighting style...still widely regarded as the best theory of street fighting in the world.
Which is why we shouldnt even be arguing with that fool. He hasnt done any sort of research, and takes Tyson because he's seen him fight
you guys are illogical. How are you going try to make it sound like it's dumb of me to take tyson because I've actually SEEN him fight, while no one (me, included) has seen lee fight, and yet still (w/o any real evidence of ability) takes lee to win this fight. The sad thing is, I probably know about lee than you clowns.
But you do know he is trained in various fighting styles, and you have seen visual evidence of his speed, and you do know Tyson is trained to use only hishands, and you do know Tyson is only trained to defend against punches, and you do know Tyson has never fought some one (In the ring) with the kinda speed thatLee had. I just don't see how that adds up to Tyson winning. Not only can Lee avoid Tysons punches alot better then the slower heavy wheights that Mikefought, but it's alot easier for Tyson to be knocked out when every blow landed on him could be lethal. Tyson isn't trained to defend attacks on hislower body, and isn't trained to fight a guy who will headbutt, elbow, kick below the waist, choke, poke eyes, etc. Tyson most likely doesn't even knowwhere to hit some one to kill them. While Bruce knows numerous spots. It just isn't adding up.
I'd agree with that.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
Huh?...
obviously he is saying that lee wouldn't be a top 20 boxer ever, either.
He'd take the shot, throw a leg sweep/kick, take Tyson down and finish the fight.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
no idea, really. but consider my question: what do you think lee would do if tyson attacked him punches? sure he could dodge a few, but what if tyson connected with one?
It also takes longer for one to reach his target with a kick than it would take for one to reach his target with a punch...Originally Posted by abeautifulhaze
Kicking range is way outside of pumching range.
Here is the result of a well placed head kick....
Woah now...Originally Posted by Sir Rob A Lot
Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
Because there are plenty of boxers both contemporary and in the past that could beat Lee in my opinion....Originally Posted by 18key
Again, wasn't talking about you. Thesimplestlife is arguing your points too, so things might have been crossed a couple times.Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
I haven't done any sort of research? Wow...Assumptions....
As far as the grand scheme and where Tyson fits in? He's not even on my top 20.
1. Ray Robinson.
2. Joe Louis
3. Ali
4. Ray Leonard
5. Willie Pep
6. Joe Frazier
7. Gene Tunney
8. Marvin Hagler
9. Roberto Duran
10. Emile Griffith
11. Jack Dempsey
12. Jake LaMotta
13. Evander Holyfield
14. Tommy Hearns
15. Larry Holmes
16. Jack Johnson
17. Julio Cesar Chavez
18. Ezzard Charles
19. George Foreman
20. Archie Moore
And plenty more better than Tyson...
If Tyson isnt in your top 20 boxers ever... then how is he better than Lee?
Heck I'd even say Juan Manuel Marquez would beat him...
Heck, Zab Judah would beat Bruce Lee.
Oh. No idea. Glad to see you've thought this out.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
no idea, really. but consider my question: what do you think lee would do if tyson attacked him punches? sure he could dodge a few, but what if tyson connected with one?Originally Posted by ItsGettinHot
Quick question, what do you think Tyson would do if Lee were to attack his lower body with kicks?Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
Illogical on what basis? That we've seen tyson, and not lee? I was saying that I was taking Tyson based off of that; I was simply just trying to re-emphasize that Lee has not really fought professionals. At least we have concrete footage of tyson fighting professional boxers.Originally Posted by 18key
Your first argument is illogical.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
you guys are illogical. How are you going try to make it sound like it's dumb of me to take tyson because I've actually SEEN him fight, while no one (me, included) has seen lee fight, and yet still (w/o any real evidence of ability) takes lee to win this fight. The sad thing is, I probably know about lee than you clowns.
Also, I have seen videos of him fighting. Real fights; tournament fights. Google is your friend. If you put any effort into it, you can find a video.
I did a research project for college on Lee. I know everything the internet can give me on him. I wont claim to know more than you, but I definitely know a lot.
Grand scheme. We're comparing apples to oranges already with Lee/Tyson. Might as well throw other weight classes in to the mix.Originally Posted by Wade187
As far as HW? Or in the grand scheme of boxing? I don't consider Jones JR. a HW let alone a great heavyweight...Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
18key wrote:
Where do you have him then? We both know he's not #1.Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
18key wrote:
SneakerHeathen wrote:
Top 5 boxer? Tyson top 5?
Lmao another dude who committed e-suicide and let it be known that he has no idea what he's talking about.
Tyson isn't top 5, p4p or HW.....
Ali, Robinson, Jones Jr., Joe Louis > Tyson.
Elaborate before I answer please..
abeautifulhaze wrote:
Just you classifying Bruce a "martial arts movie star" proves you don't know what you're talking about.
Dude developed his own fighting style...still widely regarded as the best theory of street fighting in the world.
Which is why we shouldnt even be arguing with that fool. He hasnt done any sort of research, and takes Tyson because he's seen him fight
you guys are illogical. How are you going try to make it sound like it's dumb of me to take tyson because I've actually SEEN him fight, while no one (me, included) has seen lee fight, and yet still (w/o any real evidence of ability) takes lee to win this fight. The sad thing is, I probably know about lee than you clowns.
But you do know he is trained in various fighting styles, and you have seen visual evidence of his speed, and you do know Tyson is trained to use only his hands, and you do know Tyson is only trained to defend against punches, and you do know Tyson has never fought some one (In the ring) with the kinda speed that Lee had. I just don't see how that adds up to Tyson winning. Not only can Lee avoid Tysons punches alot better then the slower heavy wheights that Mike fought, but it's alot easier for Tyson to be knocked out when every blow landed on him could be lethal. Tyson isn't trained to defend attacks on his lower body, and isn't trained to fight a guy who will headbutt, elbow, kick below the waist, choke, poke eyes, etc. Tyson most likely doesn't even know where to hit some one to kill them. While Bruce knows numerous spots. It just isn't adding up.
are you kidding me? Tyson isn't trained to kick below the waist, choke, poke eyes, etc??? tyson is from the streets, my friend. I'm surehe has some experience with improvising, and I am sure he knows how to do all the aforementioned things. Surely he hasn't perfected them to the extent oflee, but lets be serious, when push comes to shove, tyson could easily kill a man...Tyson at his peak, was also in incredible shape. It's not like he'ssome fat bum who just boxes to have something to do. No, boxing was his life.
no idea, really. but consider my question: what do you think lee would do if tyson attacked him punches? sure he could dodge a few, but what if tyson connected with one?
No idea how he could defend a lower body attack but you're insistent on a Tyson victory?
Attack him with punches and Bruce dodging them? You watching too much Dragon Ball Z.
Originally Posted by ItsGettinHot
Oh. No idea. Glad to see you've thought this out.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
no idea, really. but consider my question: what do you think lee would do if tyson attacked him punches? sure he could dodge a few, but what if tyson connected with one?Originally Posted by ItsGettinHot
Quick question, what do you think Tyson would do if Lee were to attack his lower body with kicks?Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
Illogical on what basis? That we've seen tyson, and not lee? I was saying that I was taking Tyson based off of that; I was simply just trying to re-emphasize that Lee has not really fought professionals. At least we have concrete footage of tyson fighting professional boxers.Originally Posted by 18key
Your first argument is illogical.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
you guys are illogical. How are you going try to make it sound like it's dumb of me to take tyson because I've actually SEEN him fight, while no one (me, included) has seen lee fight, and yet still (w/o any real evidence of ability) takes lee to win this fight. The sad thing is, I probably know about lee than you clowns.
Also, I have seen videos of him fighting. Real fights; tournament fights. Google is your friend. If you put any effort into it, you can find a video.
I did a research project for college on Lee. I know everything the internet can give me on him. I wont claim to know more than you, but I definitely know a lot.
relax man. the point i was making is that I don't really know what either of them would actually do when confronted with each other. we canall hypothesize about said fight, but who knows how each would attack/defend.Originally Posted by ItsGettinHot
Oh. No idea. Glad to see you've thought this out.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
no idea, really. but consider my question: what do you think lee would do if tyson attacked him punches? sure he could dodge a few, but what if tyson connected with one?Originally Posted by ItsGettinHot
Quick question, what do you think Tyson would do if Lee were to attack his lower body with kicks?Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
Illogical on what basis? That we've seen tyson, and not lee? I was saying that I was taking Tyson based off of that; I was simply just trying to re-emphasize that Lee has not really fought professionals. At least we have concrete footage of tyson fighting professional boxers.Originally Posted by 18key
Your first argument is illogical.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
you guys are illogical. How are you going try to make it sound like it's dumb of me to take tyson because I've actually SEEN him fight, while no one (me, included) has seen lee fight, and yet still (w/o any real evidence of ability) takes lee to win this fight. The sad thing is, I probably know about lee than you clowns.
Also, I have seen videos of him fighting. Real fights; tournament fights. Google is your friend. If you put any effort into it, you can find a video.
I did a research project for college on Lee. I know everything the internet can give me on him. I wont claim to know more than you, but I definitely know a lot.
World class boxer vs. Bruce Lee? Where are my fellow NT boxing freaks?! Bruce Lee would not stand a chance.Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
Woah now...
I like Zab but....Dude was always an underachiever.....
SneakerHeathen wrote:
It also takes longer for one to reach his target with a kick than it would take for one to reach his target with a punch...Originally Posted by abeautifulhaze
Kicking range is way outside of pumching range.
Here is the result of a well placed head kick....
An individual who can dodge said kick can counter with a devestating punch.
...and vice versa.
Zab JudahOriginally Posted by Sir Rob A Lot
World class boxer vs. Bruce Lee? Where are my fellow NT boxing freaks?! Bruce Lee would not stand a chance.Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
Woah now...
I like Zab but....Dude was always an underachiever.....
Grand scheme. We're comparing apples to oranges already with Lee/Tyson. Might as well throw other weight classes in to the mix.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
Wade187 wrote:
As far as HW? Or in the grand scheme of boxing? I don't consider Jones JR. a HW let alone a great heavyweight...Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
18key wrote:
Where do you have him then? We both know he's not #1.Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
18key wrote:
SneakerHeathen wrote:
Top 5 boxer? Tyson top 5?
Lmao another dude who committed e-suicide and let it be known that he has no idea what he's talking about.
Tyson isn't top 5, p4p or HW.....
Ali, Robinson, Jones Jr., Joe Louis > Tyson.
Elaborate before I answer please..
abeautifulhaze wrote:
Just you classifying Bruce a "martial arts movie star" proves you don't know what you're talking about.
Dude developed his own fighting style...still widely regarded as the best theory of street fighting in the world.
Which is why we shouldnt even be arguing with that fool. He hasnt done any sort of research, and takes Tyson because he's seen him fight
you guys are illogical. How are you going try to make it sound like it's dumb of me to take tyson because I've actually SEEN him fight, while no one (me, included) has seen lee fight, and yet still (w/o any real evidence of ability) takes lee to win this fight. The sad thing is, I probably know about lee than you clowns.
But you do know he is trained in various fighting styles, and you have seen visual evidence of his speed, and you do know Tyson is trained to use only his hands, and you do know Tyson is only trained to defend against punches, and you do know Tyson has never fought some one (In the ring) with the kinda speed that Lee had. I just don't see how that adds up to Tyson winning. Not only can Lee avoid Tysons punches alot better then the slower heavy wheights that Mike fought, but it's alot easier for Tyson to be knocked out when every blow landed on him could be lethal. Tyson isn't trained to defend attacks on his lower body, and isn't trained to fight a guy who will headbutt, elbow, kick below the waist, choke, poke eyes, etc. Tyson most likely doesn't even know where to hit some one to kill them. While Bruce knows numerous spots. It just isn't adding up.
are you kidding me? Tyson isn't trained to kick below the waist, choke, poke eyes, etc??? tyson is from the streets, my friend. I'm sure he has some experience with improvising, and I am sure he knows how to do all the aforementioned things. Surely he hasn't perfected them to the extent of lee, but lets be serious, when push comes to shove, tyson could easily kill a man...Tyson at his peak, was also in incredible shape. It's not like he's some fat bum who just boxes to have something to do. No, boxing was his life.
You and sneakerheathen have been implying this entire time that Bruce Lees fighting doesn'y count because it was on the street. So yeah Mike has someexperince but street fighting isn't the same as fighting a master of the art as you guys have been saying. Btw I said he isn't trained to defendagainst these things not that he can't do them. Tyson could not easily kill a man. A hard punch in the face isn't going to kill a man or Tyson wouldhave killed alot of people. Bruce could easily kill a man. He knows exactly where to hit you to do so. While Tyson could swing as hard as you can and mightjust hit that spot or might shatter a rib and that might puncture something. Bruce knows what he's doing while Mike is a bunch of what ifs
Originally Posted by 18key
I'd agree with that.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
Huh?...
obviously he is saying that lee wouldn't be a top 20 boxer ever, either.
But he doesnt need to be. Tyson wouldnt be able to keep up with Lee's speed. Neither would any other boxer, except a possibility of Ali.
He'd take the shot, throw a leg sweep/kick, take Tyson down and finish the fight.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
no idea, really. but consider my question: what do you think lee would do if tyson attacked him punches? sure he could dodge a few, but what if tyson connected with one?
This isnt a boxing match, its a no-rules fight that we're talking about.
Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
relax man. the point i was making is that I don't really know what either of them would actually do when confronted with each other. we can all hypothesize about said fight, but who knows how each would attack/defend.Originally Posted by ItsGettinHot
Oh. No idea. Glad to see you've thought this out.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
no idea, really. but consider my question: what do you think lee would do if tyson attacked him punches? sure he could dodge a few, but what if tyson connected with one?Originally Posted by ItsGettinHot
Quick question, what do you think Tyson would do if Lee were to attack his lower body with kicks?Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
Illogical on what basis? That we've seen tyson, and not lee? I was saying that I was taking Tyson based off of that; I was simply just trying to re-emphasize that Lee has not really fought professionals. At least we have concrete footage of tyson fighting professional boxers.Originally Posted by 18key
Your first argument is illogical.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
you guys are illogical. How are you going try to make it sound like it's dumb of me to take tyson because I've actually SEEN him fight, while no one (me, included) has seen lee fight, and yet still (w/o any real evidence of ability) takes lee to win this fight. The sad thing is, I probably know about lee than you clowns.
Also, I have seen videos of him fighting. Real fights; tournament fights. Google is your friend. If you put any effort into it, you can find a video.
I did a research project for college on Lee. I know everything the internet can give me on him. I wont claim to know more than you, but I definitely know a lot.
but, to answer the original question, if lee attacked tyson's lower body with kicks, tyson would probably have to tolerate a few, and go at lee's head. Lee, would then either have to stop the kicks, and defend, or risk having his jaw broken.
Which is why we shouldnt even be arguing with that fool. He hasnt done any sort of research, and takes Tyson because he's seen him fightOriginally Posted by Wade187
Grand scheme. We're comparing apples to oranges already with Lee/Tyson. Might as well throw other weight classes in to the mix.Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
Wade187 wrote:
As far as HW? Or in the grand scheme of boxing? I don't consider Jones JR. a HW let alone a great heavyweight...Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
18key wrote:
Where do you have him then? We both know he's not #1.Originally Posted by SneakerHeathen
18key wrote:
SneakerHeathen wrote:
Top 5 boxer? Tyson top 5?
Lmao another dude who committed e-suicide and let it be known that he has no idea what he's talking about.
Tyson isn't top 5, p4p or HW.....
Ali, Robinson, Jones Jr., Joe Louis > Tyson.
Elaborate before I answer please..
If you take off Jones, lets throw in a HW... say Foreman or Marciano. But then I think Tyson would beat them if all were in their primes.
abeautifulhaze wrote:
Just you classifying Bruce a "martial arts movie star" proves you don't know what you're talking about.
Dude developed his own fighting style...still widely regarded as the best theory of street fighting in the world.