Originally Posted by
thesimplestlife
Wade187 wrote:
Originally Posted by
thesimplestlife
Wade187 wrote:
Originally Posted by
thesimplestlife
Wade187 wrote:
Originally Posted by
thesimplestlife
18key wrote:
Originally Posted by
SneakerHeathen
18key wrote:
SneakerHeathen wrote:
Top 5 boxer? Tyson top 5?
Lmao another dude who committed e-suicide and let it be known that he has no idea what he's talking about.
Tyson isn't top 5, p4p or HW.....
Where do you have him then? We both know he's not #1.
Ali, Robinson, Jones Jr., Joe Louis > Tyson.
As far as HW? Or in the grand scheme of boxing? I don't consider Jones JR. a HW let alone a great heavyweight...
Elaborate before I answer please..
Grand scheme. We're comparing apples to oranges already with Lee/Tyson. Might as well throw other weight classes in to the mix.
If you take off Jones, lets throw in a HW... say Foreman or Marciano. But then I think Tyson would beat them if all were in their primes.
abeautifulhaze wrote:
Just you classifying Bruce a "martial arts movie star" proves you don't know what you're talking about.
Dude developed his own fighting style...still widely regarded as the best theory of street fighting in the world.
Which is why we shouldnt even be arguing with that fool. He hasnt done any sort of research, and takes Tyson because he's seen him fight
you guys are illogical. How are you going try to make it sound like it's dumb of me to take tyson because I've actually SEEN him fight, while no one (me, included) has seen lee fight, and yet still (w/o any real evidence of ability) takes lee to win this fight. The sad thing is, I probably know about lee than you clowns.
But you do know he is trained in various fighting styles, and you have seen visual evidence of his speed, and you do know Tyson is trained to use only his hands, and you do know Tyson is only trained to defend against punches, and you do know Tyson has never fought some one (In the ring) with the kinda speed that Lee had. I just don't see how that adds up to Tyson winning. Not only can Lee avoid Tysons punches alot better then the slower heavy wheights that Mike fought, but it's alot easier for Tyson to be knocked out when every blow landed on him could be lethal. Tyson isn't trained to defend attacks on his lower body, and isn't trained to fight a guy who will headbutt, elbow, kick below the waist, choke, poke eyes, etc. Tyson most likely doesn't even know where to hit some one to kill them. While Bruce knows numerous spots. It just isn't adding up.
are you kidding me? Tyson isn't trained to kick below the waist, choke, poke eyes, etc??? tyson is from the streets, my friend. I'm sure he has some experience with improvising, and I am sure he knows how to do all the aforementioned things. Surely he hasn't perfected them to the extent of lee, but lets be serious, when push comes to shove, tyson could easily kill a man...Tyson at his peak, was also in incredible shape. It's not like he's some fat bum who just boxes to have something to do. No, boxing was his life.
You and sneakerheathen have been implying this entire time that Bruce Lees fighting doesn'y count because it was on the street. So yeah Mike has some experince but street fighting isn't the same as fighting a master of the art as you guys have been saying. Btw I said he isn't trained to defend against these things not that he can't do them. Tyson could not easily kill a man. A hard punch in the face isn't going to kill a man or Tyson would have killed alot of people. Bruce could easily kill a man. He knows exactly where to hit you to do so. While Tyson could swing as hard as you can and might just hit that spot or might shatter a rib and that might puncture something. Bruce knows what he's doing while Mike is a bunch of what ifs
AHAHAH. tyson couldn't easily kill a man?? I guess that depends on your definition of easy...but, when your fists are registered weapons, I would consider that pretty easy. And, no, we have been implying that lee's fighting doesn't count because hes fought BUMS on the street. Now, if he would have beat up on ali, frasier, or some other world class professional in some back alley, maybe you'd have a case. But..since that didn't happen...well...yea
A bunch of punches isn't easily. Bruce knowing one spot to hit with one attack is alot easier that's what I'm saying. My whole argument is including the "fact" that Lee did only fight bums, so what's your point? You really have no case or point other then the fact that Tyson is strong and fast. While I have laid out multiple points in why Tyson can't defeat Lee at least not in a no rule fight til the death.
I never said Lee couldn't kill a man. Surely he could as well. Other than the fact that tyson is strong and fast? Many people are strong and fast, but many people aren't mike tyson. Lets just leave it at that. Unfortunately I cannot continue this argument all night, and it doesn't matter anyway--I will think what I think, and you will think what you will think. It was an interesting back and fourth. With that said...
Tyson knocks out lee, after dodging a roundhouse
Ehh i'd like to say the same but you never really had a valid point to begin with. Btw any one with common sense knows Bruce wouldn't be throwingcareless roundhouses, but everyone knows Mike would be throwing careless haymakers. So once again you don't really have a point.
