Closed - New thread started

[Deleted member 38182]

Napear is adamant right now about Mastrov/Burkle coming up with a new offer.

And on the arena front, I'm confidant Burkle will take care of that 

 

[lightweight champion]

His analysis was spot on though. If you go to buy a car you always haggle the price and talk it down if you can.

 

[Deleted member 38182]

This is what I like to see #countonstern

Shirey: NBA now working with Sacramento to ensure that investor team and the City can deliver on a new arena downtown for #nbakings.
— nickmonacelli (@nickmonacelli) March 13, 2013

 

[lightweight champion]

And there you have it, if and when the downtown arena plan comes to form later this month the BoG will block the Hansen sale.

#maloofsgetmaloofed

 

[Deleted member 38182]

deep down, I really think the Kings will stay...

 

[crcballer55]

I'm in the same boat. Like I said in the last thread, I think ultimately, Stern will influence the owners to block the sale since the Maloofs effectively undermined a deal that he personally put together. NOBODY undermines David Stern. He's the mafia Don of the NBA>

I do think Seattle will get an expansion team though. There are too many people who will get hurt in a situation where the Kings move to Seattle not to expand the league and revenue sources.

 

[Deleted member 38182]

these mascot's dance routine 

 

[dakid23]

Attorneys pledge to file referendum petition if city council approves subsidy for downtown arena



Reminds me of what happen in Seattle in 08.

 

[Deleted member 38182]

How does it remind you of Seattle in 08?

Reminds of the same lawsuits the Niners faced in Santa Clara and the longshoresmen suits in Seattle.

Reading the Seattle reaction to this is priceless

Also I've been hearing that this suit might be Seattle backed. If so yikes

 

[dakid23]

How does it remind you of Seattle in 08?

Reminds of the same lawsuits the Niners faced in Santa Clara and the longshoresmen suits in Seattle.

Reading the Seattle reaction to this is priceless

Also I've been hearing that this suit might be Seattle backed. If so yikes

Back in '08 some residents where making it difficult for Seattle to keep the sonics. I also thought they where on the OKC payroll

 

[Deleted member 38182]

How does it remind you of Seattle in 08?

Reminds of the same lawsuits the Niners faced in Santa Clara and the longshoresmen suits in Seattle.

Reading the Seattle reaction to this is priceless

Also I've been hearing that this suit might be Seattle backed. If so yikes

Back in '08 some residents where making it difficult for Seattle to keep the sonics. I also thought they where on the OKC payroll

Ah I see. I'm not too worried about this. Last year when we had an arena deal in place some local crackhead group came out and said this same stuff. It's just a little distracting since there's so little time. But all things considered, I'm not worried about these narrow minded idiots.

 

[air force baller]

Bye sacs, kings welcome to seattle

 

[Deleted member 38182]

 

[a55a5in11]

And there you have it, if and when the downtown arena plan comes to form later this month the BoG will block the Hansen sale.

#maloofsgetmaloofed

false. team will get sold to highest bidder

 

[Deleted member 38182]

And there you have it, if and when the downtown arena plan comes to form later this month the BoG will block the Hansen sale.

#maloofsgetmaloofed

false. team will get sold to highest bidder

false. Seattle can't improve or add to a 'bid' when there is already a legally binding and sealed agreement between Hansen/Balmer and the Maloofs.

So I guess you could say there is only one bid that can be improved and the people governing said bid happens to be Stern/NBA. 

As of right now there is only one bidder and that is Sacramento.

 

[Deleted member 38182]

I still think that NBA's constitutional requirements of relocation and Stern's checklist he has set forth for KJ, once met, will ensure that the Kings stay in Sacramento.

I firmly believe that the ball is in Sac's court. 

 

[dakid23]

I still think that NBA's constitutional requirements of relocation and Stern's checklist he has set forth for KJ, once met, will ensure that the Kings stay in Sacramento.

I firmly believe that the ball is in Sac's court. 

Rck you remind me of myself back in '08

Once your teams leaves it doesn't hit you until the next season begins

 

[Deleted member 38182]

I still think that NBA's constitutional requirements of relocation and Stern's checklist he has set forth for KJ, once met, will ensure that the Kings stay in Sacramento.

I firmly believe that the ball is in Sac's court. 

Rck you remind me of myself back in '08

How could you feel confidant back in 08 when Bennett had every intent of moving the team, and your local and regional government failed Sonics fans at every turn... but I'll take that as a compliment I guess 

My confidence comes from A) KJ B) Sacramento coming up with a viable solution C)Hansen/Balmer not being able to improve their offer D)The Maloofs aren't involved with us anymore

I mean, like the previous poster tried to state, the Kings are going to the highest bidder... and as of right now Seattle, legally, cannot be in this bidding process and the people running the bidding process is helping the lone bidder, Sacramento.

 

[lightweight champion]

false. team will get sold to highest bidder

Nope. Rck elaborated on it. The Seattle sale COULD still go through, but I have many reasons to believe that it won't.

 

[a55a5in11]

[QUOTE url="/t/509403/sacramento-kings-thread-23-43-lal-3-17-630/1060_20#post_17449773"]

And there you have it, if and when the downtown arena plan comes to form later this month the BoG will block the Hansen sale.


#maloofsgetmaloofed

false. team will get sold to highest bidder

false. Seattle can't improve or add to a 'bid' when there is already a legally binding and sealed agreement between Hansen/Balmer and the Maloofs.

So I guess you could say there is only one bid that can be improved and the people governing said bid happens to be Stern/NBA. 

As of right now there is only one bidder and that is Sacramento.
[/quote]

I have nothing but respect for you. So I'm not gonna argue.
But I don't see why the nba wouldn't sell to the highest bidder even if Hanson raises his bid. They have proven they are for the money and nothing else

 

[lightweight champion]

Because he can't raise his bid.

 

[Deleted member 38182]

And there you have it, if and when the downtown arena plan comes to form later this month the BoG will block the Hansen sale.


#maloofsgetmaloofed

false. team will get sold to highest bidder

false. Seattle can't improve or add to a 'bid' when there is already a legally binding and sealed agreement between Hansen/Balmer and the Maloofs.

So I guess you could say there is only one bid that can be improved and the people governing said bid happens to be Stern/NBA. 

As of right now there is only one bidder and that is Sacramento.

I have nothing but respect for you. So I'm not gonna argue.
But I don't see why the nba wouldn't sell to the highest bidder even if Hanson raises his bid. They have proven they are for the money and nothing else

And I respect all you guys too, which is why I try not to really argue or impose in your guys's thread (which I feel like I'm doing a pretty bad job of so I apologize 

)

I agree in that Hansen/Balmer are just straight up endless money bags, but I was just clarifying that they can't change their bid because that offer has already been agreed upon by both the seller and buyers, as I mentioned earlier is a legally binding deal. Therefore, Hansen/Balmer can't raise or change their bid. 

Which is why I'm confidant the ball is in Sacramento's court once KJ gets the arena deal hammered away this week, and Mastrov/Burkle match the agreed upon deal that Hansen/Balmer struck with the Maloofs.

 

[dakid23]

Somebody should make a Hope poster with KJ

 

[Deleted member 38182]

Somebody should make a Hope poster with KJ

like one of these?? There's one floating around that was made back in 2011 

 I gotta find that one, I think it was my avy for a while back then

 

[Deleted member 38182]

No DMC... not exactly worried cuz I find it a little more enjoyable to watch the Kings sans him nowadays