- 13,562
- 9,550
enlighten me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I prefer my hair low cause I prefer it your rationale is kinda reachingConforming to the corporate image of how a black man should be groomed. A low cut can almost be thought of as synonymous with suppression of culture and ethnicity. Like in the corporate world, a black man with dreads or an afro would be frowned upon as opposed to one with a clean and low cut.
Also I remember reading on NT a while back about how Obama doesn't get lined up in order to not appear "too black".
This is the only rationale I can fathom. I think corporate perception on how a black man's hair is groomed isn't as bad as it used to be though.
so young girls being taught that their natural hair is inadequate in 2014 wouldn't be categorized as a major psychological dysfunction?i consider the term "self-hatred" as a symptom for a major psychological dysfunction, so using that term is ignorant
explain.
Conforming to the corporate image of how a black man should be groomed. A low cut can almost be thought of as synonymous with suppression of culture and ethnicity. Like in the corporate world, a black man with dreads or an afro would be frowned upon as opposed to one with a clean and low cut.
Also I remember reading on NT a while back about how Obama doesn't get lined up in order to not appear "too black".
This is the only rationale I can fathom. I think corporate perception on how a black man's hair is groomed isn't as bad as it used to be though.
Conforming to the corporate image of how a black man should be groomed. A low cut can almost be thought of as synonymous with suppression of culture and ethnicity. Like in the corporate world, a black man with dreads or an afro would be frowned upon as opposed to one with a clean and low cut.
Also I remember reading on NT a while back about how Obama doesn't get lined up in order to not appear "too black".
This is the only rationale I can fathom. I think corporate perception on how a black man's hair is groomed isn't as bad as it used to be though.
Conforming to the corporate image of how a black man should be groomed. A low cut can almost be thought of as synonymous with suppression of culture and ethnicity. Like in the corporate world, a black man with dreads or an afro would be frowned upon as opposed to one with a clean and low cut.
Also I remember reading on NT a while back about how Obama doesn't get lined up in order to not appear "too black".
This is the only rationale I can fathom. I think corporate perception on how a black man's hair is groomed isn't as bad as it used to be though.
huh?
so young girls being taught that their natural hair is inadequate in 2014 wouldn't be categorized as a major psychological dysfunction?
or are you just playing coy for the sake of argument?
Lol let me know where the reach is fella; just offering up my rationale of dude's statement. *shrug*
Dude said getting low cuts is conforming to white America and fitting in to the workplace and I'm like even kids? Dude was reaching
so I`m oppressing myself because I like the way a low cut and waves look? LOL
What, bruh? You sure you belong in this Thread...?wtf how. its just another way to style hair.
thats like saying white ppl who dreadlock their hair is the epitome of self hate.
brah you already used that meme.
What, bruh? You sure you belong in this Thread...?
A Black person getting Relaxer to Chemically Change the Natural Texture of their Hair IS NOT A HAIR STYLE. Where on the other end, Locks are a Hairstyle.
How can you even compare it to someone NATURALLY growing Locks???
That's like saying someone who went through Surgical Gender Transformation is the Same as someone choosing to Dress like a 2014 Rapper...
The Two Things Just Don't Correlate.
Lol. Negro, I ain't on THIS page yet. Don't care what's being talking about bc it's turning into a race thread. I just saw a JAKE Comment you made a page ago & spoke on it.
the conversation is about social implications brah.
its past the chemical nature of a hairstyle.
brah you already used that meme.
we are talking about social implications. not the chemical nature of a HAIR STYLE.
and that last comparison is just childish.
sorry negro, i thought you take your posts very seriously. since you take time out to highlight your key points.
Lol. Negro, I ain't on THIS page yet. Don't care what's being talking about bc it's turning into a race thread. I just saw a JAKE Comment you made a page ago & spoke on it.
The comparison I made IS SILLY... and that's the Point! LOL
The two things have nothing to do with each other... the same way Relaxer & Dreads have nothing to do w/ each other.
And c'mon bro... the last thing I'm worried about is keeping track of MEME USAGE. LOLOL! If they fit, they fit...