Arian Foster Let It Be Known That He Is A Non-Believer

[Nawzlew]

What are the characteristics of Athiests?


If something is Athiest in Nature, what does that mean?

Maybe where the goal is to eliminate or denounce religion?

 

[darthska]

[quote name="youngwolf"][quote name="DarthSka"][quote name="Mister Friendly"]The reason Stalin was brought because a post said atheists were humane, which is totally untrue[/quote]Totally untrue?

"I shouldn't punch you in the face, because god said no. Buuuuuuuut, if I do, Jesus died for my forgiveness."

"I shouldn't punch you in the face, because I know how that would feel, and I wouldn't like that if it were done to me."

Who you trusting, dude?

I do not trust that first person. AT ALL. This is real talk. That's a philosophy I live with in real life. You tell me you're religious, I don't trust you, because I know forgiveness is your fallback. Atheists have no forgiveness eraser, and no reward of a fake heaven they're trying to keep in mind.[/quote]

What if person two is also religious?[/quote]As soon as it hops of its unicorn, I'd buy him/her a drink.

 

[sea manup]

 

instead of repeating stalins name over and over

could you explain how your every day atheist is not humane as a cause of being an atheist? 


as in, explain a few common character traits of an atheist and connect those with possible actions said atheist would take which most people would consider inhumane 

I never said atheists aren't humane

My disagreement was with the statement, that atheists are MORE humane

there are terrible people that are atheists and there are terrible people that are theists

however

no one is a terrible person because they are an atheist

while 

there are plenty of examples of people doing terrible things in the name of religion (see ISIS)

so on average i would say atheists are more humane but that doesnt mean anything since you still have to judge each person on its own

 

[youngwolf]

[quote name="youngwolf"][quote name="DarthSka"][quote name="Mister Friendly"]The reason Stalin was brought because a post said atheists were humane, which is totally untrue

Totally untrue?

"I shouldn't punch you in the face, because god said no. Buuuuuuuut, if I do, Jesus died for my forgiveness."

"I shouldn't punch you in the face, because I know how that would feel, and I wouldn't like that if it were done to me."

Who you trusting, dude?

I do not trust that first person. AT ALL. This is real talk. That's a philosophy I live with in real life. You tell me you're religious, I don't trust you, because I know forgiveness is your fallback. Atheists have no forgiveness eraser, and no reward of a fake heaven they're trying to keep in mind.[/quote]

What if person two is also religious?[/quote]As soon as it hops of its unicorn, I'd buy him/her a drink. [/quote]

Are you saying person two can't be religious?

 

[mister friendly]

 

 

My disagreement was with the statement, that atheists are MORE humane

there are terrible people that are atheists and there are terrible people that are theists


however

no one is a terrible person because they are an atheist

while 

there are plenty of examples of people doing terrible things in the name of religion (see ISIS)


so on average i would say atheists are more humane but that doesnt mean anything since you still have to judge each person on its own

No atheists are not more humane

 

[sea manup]

 

 

[thread="633320"]Arian Foster Let It Be Known That He Is A Non Believer/720#post_23933042​[/thread]
Stalin didn't want organized religion in his society. Prosecuted the church for most of his reign, sent millions of believers to concentration camps. Communist manifesto speak negatively about the church but maybe Stalins actions aren't that of a man with atheist convinctions

 

none of these things are atheist in nature though

So they were God fearing actions?

they were the actions of a guy who wanted power

are you suggesting that if stalin was religious he would not have been evil? 

 

[Nawzlew]

I think the argument goes like this.

Atheists do horrible things. But it's just a coincidence that they are Atheist. Atheism wasn't the REASON they did such thing. It's just because they're bad people.

Whereas religion is used as a REASON to do something.

 

[deleted]

No atheists are not more humane

Please stop ducking my question.

 

[sea manup]

 

 

 

instead of repeating stalins name over and over


could you explain how your every day atheist is not humane as a cause of being an atheist? 



as in, explain a few common character traits of an atheist and connect those with possible actions said atheist would take which most people would consider inhumane 

I never said atheists aren't humane


My disagreement was with the statement, that atheists are MORE humane

there are terrible people that are atheists and there are terrible people that are theists


however

no one is a terrible person because they are an atheist

while 

there are plenty of examples of people doing terrible things in the name of religion (see ISIS)


so on average i would say atheists are more humane but that doesnt mean anything since you still have to judge each person on its own

No atheists are not more humane

oh good, no counter point

 

[rolaholic]

I think the argument goes like this.

Atheists do horrible things. But it's just a coincidence that they are Atheist. Atheism wasn't the REASON they did such thing. It's just because they're bad people.

Whereas religion is used as a REASON to do something.

Zo.gif

 

[mister friendly]

I think the argument goes like this.

Atheists do horrible things. But it's just a coincidence that they are Atheist. Atheism wasn't the REASON they did such thing. It's just because they're bad people.

Whereas religion is used as a REASON to do something.

Yep

As if non believe cant motive someone as much as believe could

 

[DCAllAfrican]

No atheists are not more humane

It is like he refuses to move on from this SIDE point.

Aight man, we get it. Athiests are not more humane.

Fine.

But what makes something Athiest in Nature?

 

[rolaholic]

 

I think the argument goes like this.

Atheists do horrible things. But it's just a coincidence that they are Atheist. Atheism wasn't the REASON they did such thing. It's just because they're bad people.

Whereas religion is used as a REASON to do something.

Yep

As if non believe cant motive someone as much as believe could

I think his post went over your head...

 

[DCAllAfrican]

Yep

As if non believe cant motive someone as much as believe could

I don't think you understand the flaws in that statement.

 

[Nawzlew]

I think the argument goes like this.

Atheists do horrible things. But it's just a coincidence that they are Atheist. Atheism wasn't the REASON they did such thing. It's just because they're bad people.

Whereas religion is used as a REASON to do something.

Yep

As if non believe cant motive someone as much as believe could

For example, something like hate/want for revenge isn't an atheist motive, it's .. idk, a human motive?

Like if an atheist dude kills a man because he was smashing his wife, one of his reasons could be revenge. Is revenge atheistic in nature? No. It's a human response.

 

[mister friendly]

I think the argument goes like this.

Atheists do horrible things. But it's just a coincidence that they are Atheist. Atheism wasn't the REASON they did such thing. It's just because they're bad people.

Whereas religion is used as a REASON to do something.

For example, something like hate/want for revenge isn't an atheist motive, it's .. idk, a human motive?

Like if an atheist dude kills a man because he was smashing his wife, one of his reasons could be revenge. Is revenge atheistic in nature? No. It's a human response.

An atheist is just an non believer in God

By killing the man, he is giving in to his God less human nature.

Is that man wrong to kill the other man?

 

[sea manup]

 

 

 

I think the argument goes like this.

Atheists do horrible things. But it's just a coincidence that they are Atheist. Atheism wasn't the REASON they did such thing. It's just because they're bad people.

Whereas religion is used as a REASON to do something.

For example, something like hate/want for revenge isn't an atheist motive, it's .. idk, a human motive?

Like if an atheist dude kills a man because he was smashing his wife, one of his reasons could be revenge. Is revenge atheistic in nature? No. It's a human response.

An atheist is just an non believer in God

By killing the man, he is giving in to his God less human nature.

 

[rolaholic]

 

Are wild animals giving into their godless nature as well?

 

[deleted]

And there it is

 

[DCAllAfrican]

An atheist is just an non believer in God

By killing the man, he is giving in to his God less human nature.

Is that man wrong to kill the other man?

 Aight. I know for sure you are behind your PC screen laughing it up at this point. You win

 

[Nawzlew]

I think the argument goes like this.

Atheists do horrible things. But it's just a coincidence that they are Atheist. Atheism wasn't the REASON they did such thing. It's just because they're bad people.

Whereas religion is used as a REASON to do something.

For example, something like hate/want for revenge isn't an atheist motive, it's .. idk, a human motive?

Like if an atheist dude kills a man because he was smashing his wife, one of his reasons could be revenge. Is revenge atheistic in nature? No. It's a human response.

An atheist is just an non believer in God

By killing the man, he is giving in to his God less human nature.

 

[sea manup]

anyone down for an NT atheist summit where we go around town murdering people? 

 

[deleted]

Mister Friendly*

*as long as you're not a Godless heathen

 

[rolaholic]

 
anyone down for an NT atheist summit where we go around town murdering people? 

Sounds like fun,I'm also down to end the night by bathing in newborn blood

 

[sea manup]

there should be a purge night where all actual laws still apply but for one night you can do anything without god getting upset

i wonder what would happen