- 65
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2008
Randolph has show more potential in terms of what? I'd understand if you were talking about offense but what you were talking about being"beasted in the paint" on defense. Now how I interpret that is that a Boozer-type PF would back him down at will. To me, Wright and Randolphcan't stop a Boozer-type player from backing them down at will. Whatever point you were trying to make there wasn't made at all. They'll both get"beasted in the paint."Originally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by Paul Is All In
Your reasoning doesn't make sense. You say the Warriors are lacking bigs. Ok, I tell you we have bigs. Then you say they get "beasted in the paint" especially how Wright gets beasted in the paint. Then you bring up Randolph replacing Wright, but what you fail to acknowledge is Randolph is thinner than Wright. OkOriginally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by Paul Is All In
No big men whatsoever? I think that's a stretch. Oh, and what's the point of getting Stoudemire if we're giving up 2 bigs to get him (Biedrins and Wright). We lose a big in that deal. Isn't that counter productive?Originally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt
Elaborate please. There are a lot of Warriors fans (minus dpOriginally Posted by got shoes
Warriors really need this trade to go through) that say that we don't need this trade. I want to know why you think it's a good trade.
First if they keep Curry, the Warriors are filled with a bunch of guards. Curry, Azubike, Watson, Ellis, Jackson, Belinelli (garbage). They have no big men whatsover. And plus Ellis has ben *****in to staff about the direction they have been going. So they might want to get a star in there while they can or Ellis will be outta there. Warriors are not a hot ticket team to play on so they better wheel and deal b4 we have another 15 year drought. Biedris aint worth 9 million when you have no offensive and always getting beasted by other centers.
Yeah, we know we have guards, but IMO, the guards to get rid of are Azubuike (I can stomach letting him go), Maggette, Jackson, C.J. Watson, Acie Law, and Speedy Claxton. Those are the guys we need to let go. If we need to give up Belinelli, then ok, as long as what we're getting back in return is worthwhile.
Wright and Beidrins are always getting beasted in the paint. They are too small play down there. Turaif which is undersized plays harder than Biedris. Wright will be replaced with Randolph.
You also are overrating Amare as a center. He's more suited to be a PF in this league. Doesn't that make us still undersized?
Randolph has shown more potential than Wright. Yes Wright has been injured, by the drive Randolph is starting to pick up. So your saying that Biedris would be a better center than Amare. I know you have ssen the Warrior games when Amare was killin Biedris at Oracle. Yes they still we be undersized but at least they have a dominate big man that can score unlike Biedris. So why don't you want the trade to go through?
I'm not saying Biedrins would be better than Amare. Stop putting words in my mouth. I'm saying that Biedrins is a good center. The thing you weresaying was that Biedrins is an undersized center. I said that Amare is a more natural PF and is also undersized at center. So that point you tried to makewasn't made, again.
I don't want Amare because of the uncertainty of Amare re-signing. If Amare had the same amount of years on his contract, I'd be for it. At least withBiedrins, we know he's going to be here for 5 years. Also, Biedrins is far from being a bum. He's a good center who is improving his game. I saw growthlast year, I expect to see growth this year. Amare's ego is incredibly huge.
Below is Stoudemire's contract year by year. Stoudemire will be commanding so much money. Can we afford him with Jackson's extension, Monta'scontract, Maggette's contract, etc? That's another question that must be answered. It's another thing that we're uncertain about.