- 15,195
- 4,500
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2008
Originally Posted by JsindaA
Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Can ask a question?
The common beef with Nash is that he was all offense and no defense, if that is the case than how come AI is a clear hall of framer when boy was not playing ANY type of defense (aside from gambling for steals) when it could be argued that Nash was a far more efficient offensive player.
AI was drafted onto a crappy team and was made the number one option and took a million shots a game, he was lucky enough to have an entire team built around him to ensure his success. Nash was just a cog in a very good Mavericks team and wasn't the central option on a team until he signed with Phoenix. How come nash is so obviously NOT a hall of famer but AI is?
Eric Snow
Aaron Mckie
Tyrone Hill
Dikembe
that's a team built for success?
reading comprehension ftl.... he meant A.I's own numbers. also Agreed with Osh. Nas was very efficient shooting 50% from field, 40% from 3 and 90% from ftat one point. and D' Anphony didnt shoot all those shots and didnt make all those passes or clutch shots. Nash could still be very good in his years tocome since he doesnt rely on athleticism