- Dec 30, 2012
- 3,768
- 1,120
Nah, the PS1 will never be able topped
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah, thePS1PS2 will never be able topped
multiple sources
multiple sources
anybody who thinks sony was gonna go anywhere near 500 again is kidding themselves
$100 for the camera??
Here's a bundle here in europe which is the same price as the XBone
View media item 601554
Game, extra controller and the camera.
The camera was cut because not everyone wants one. Why force the consumer to buy what they don't want. It decreases the perceptive value of the console.
I'm not saying it wasn't also a strategic decision to lower the price and be competitve but common sense prevailed basically.
ummm... maybe its just me but... id rather take a free controller and killzone over boring @ss forza....Yea the same Europe that the Xbox One has the free FORZA with every console sold? You and I both know damn well Sony is offering that sweet *** deal to compete with what M$ is doing. Don't try to use that as a basis to compare pricing in the US.
ummm... maybe its just me but... id rather take a free controller and killzone over boring @ss forza....
killzone is an exclusive, so it's obvious why sony bundled that game.There's also a free FIFA bundle as well and that is THE most popular sport over there. I'm sure NO ONE one in Europe would agree that a solid but still generic shooter like Killzone could compete with the likes of FIFA.ummm... maybe its just me but... id rather take a free controller and killzone over boring @ss forza....
killzone is an exclusive, so it's obvious why sony bundled that game.
Yea well a site as reputable as GS won't just post some B.S.
I dont think they knew the exact price, but they probably had an idea of the general range. But I do believe that they got rid of the eye to lower the price. Why would you design a controller to work with a camera and then not include a camera, basically sending the product to die?
I dont think they knew the exact price, but they probably had an idea of the general range. But I do believe that they got rid of the eye to lower the price. Why would you design a controller to work with a camera and then not include a camera, basically sending the product to die?
How would it have been $499 if the camera is $60?
How would it have been $499 if the camera is $60?
consumers dont care about the manufacturing standpoint which is exactly what sony realizes
it seems sony realized a lot stuff that that other company didnt
that 499 article sounds like that disc-free ps4 article,, trying to make a big deal out of something that was just thrown around
I learned a long time ago that its just arguing for arguing sake. He has no point other than too get a reaction.
I learned a long time ago that its just arguing for arguing sake. He has no point other than too get a reaction.
I didn't know I was arguing. If I said anything that wasn't true in my last two posts then sure I have no other point then just to get a reaction.
crippling what devs can do
its not like all the amazing motion gaming we've seen so far hasnt crippled itself, nope