- Sep 28, 2002
- 6,874
- 2,805
no, its not
we're still gonna be sitting on a couch with a controller in our hands eating cheetos as we play some camera-less game
Ok bruh you're right. Its all a huge waste of money. You got it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no, its not
we're still gonna be sitting on a couch with a controller in our hands eating cheetos as we play some camera-less game
its not a waste of money if its what youre interested in
its just not something thats going to change gaming, especially if sales are like preorders and they have to bite the bullet
so you stand in front of your tv and it recognizes you, okay
Save for Just dance and fitness games, there's nothing in the pipline that utilizes Kinnect in any meaningful way. Hell, Ryse started as a Kinnect game, only to be reworked into a controller game with minor Kinnect features.
Sony's shown some cool stuff with the PS eye and the Playroom demo, but nothing that makes the PS eye a must buy.
Why are yall acting like the ps4 wasnt going to be 499 at launch? Its pretty well known the PS EYE was cut in order to keep the cost down and undercut M $
It was cut because gamers SPOKE and they did NOT want a camera bundled, also they don't need another mega priced console 7 years later. Sony is learning from their mistakes if you didn't notice.
You just know?its not a waste of money if its what youre interested in
its just not something thats going to change gaming, especially if sales are like preorders and they have to bite the bullet
so you stand in front of your tv and it recognizes you, okay
I hear you. I just know for a fact if the EYE was mandatory and the Kinect wasn't, you'd be telling me how great the things was. But hey as it is, I think both will play a huge part in future gaming. But I'm in the minority here.
It was cut because gamers SPOKE and they did NOT want a camera bundled, also they don't need another mega priced console 7 years later. Sony is learning from their mistakes if you didn't notice.
The camera itself doesn't even cost $100 and you don't even need it to play PS4 (unlike Xbox One before they change there policy).
You just know?
Because you are him? You just know
I always agreed with party chat cause I missed that when I had a 360 we stayed in party chat.. I also always believed live was better but I never really knew about plus so my beliefs were always biased.. Trophies and achievement crap never mattered to me.
But those two things aren't the camera.. If the ps4 had mandatory camera id be pretty pissed.. I know I would never use it same with the kinect.. So glad they made it optional for us gamers and not throw it in up the price and make it mandatory.. If you want it buy it if not don't
PLVN jetpac in here to save the x1
Sony is going to lose money no matter what. No company sees profit after the first year or two anyways, of course it wouldn't be as bad if it was priced higher IE: $499.99, but they would be losing a lot of gamers and it would be PS3 all over again.It was cut because gamers SPOKE and they did NOT want a camera bundled, also they don't need another mega priced console 7 years later. Sony is learning from their mistakes if you didn't notice.
The camera itself doesn't even cost $100 and you don't even need it to play PS4 (unlike Xbox One before they change there policy).
See my post about Sony losing money per console, thus the 499 PS Eye bundle would make since. And say what you will about Sony "leaning" from their mistakes, but it was all to get a leg up.
Yea the same Europe that the Xbox One has the free FORZA with every console sold? You and I both know damn well Sony is offering that sweet *** deal to compete with what M$ is doing. Don't try to use that as a basis to compare pricing in the US.
Your acting like the console COSTS 399 to make, Sony is losing money per console. A $499 price point with the camera would make perfect sense from a manufacture stand point.
Damn...this thread really is better than the Xbox thread
Which one of you guys did a focus test group for an upcoming game today and mentioned NT?
You don't have to violate your NDA and talk about it but I'm just interested to see which NTer you are
$499 with the camera does not make sense because not everyone wants the camera, it's not worth $100 either and we all know they make more money from software than hardware which is why they can be aggresive on pricing and take a loss on hardware.
Which one of you guys did a focus test group for an upcoming game today and mentioned NT?
You don't have to violate your NDA and talk about it but I'm just interested to see which NTer you are
yeswait how much is the PS4, $399?
That's like saying you don't want to pay for the on board Ethernet adapter, wireless capabilities and functionality of PSN - because you are a strictly offline gamer. Doesn't matter it is still factored in to the cost of the PS3/PS4. Truth is, if it is a part of that companies strategy (see Dreamcast) it will be included whether you want it or not and that company would be more than just to price you accordingly.
Just because YOU in particular don't want something doesn't mean it doesn't make sense from a company stand point.