Humbled
formerly whatslosinlike
- 15,616
- 2,161
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
Originally Posted by NikeAir45
And people wonder why I hate Lebron.
Dwade and Bosh aren't enough help? U need Nash too?
That would be
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by NikeAir45
And people wonder why I hate Lebron.
Dwade and Bosh aren't enough help? U need Nash too?
Originally Posted by CP1708
Doo, Statis, other small market cry babies, I DEMAND answers. And I want them right the @#$% now.
2009-2010 NBA Salaries
Cleveland 116 mil
Blazers 84 mil
Memphis 83 mil
Magic 82 mil
Suns 79 mil
TWolves 77 mil
Spurs 77 mil
Lakers 77 mil
Bucks 76 mil
ARE YOU @#$%^&* KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!!!!????????????? I had to listen to all your @#$%&^%$ and THESE are the numbers from ONE year ago??????
So because the Lakers payroll went up from extending THEIR OWN PLAYERS, they are a problem? Is this a joke?
Somebody, PLEASE double check my numbers and tell me I am missing something. Tell me I screwed this all up. Cuz I pulled this from USA Today, so help me God if this is accurate, and you guys were in here runnin off at the God damn mouth over @#$% that isn't even @#$%^&* true.
Don't pull thru here and act like you don't see this @#$% neither, you reply right the hell now. I want answers NOW.
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/basketball/nba/salaries/team
Originally Posted by CP1708
Doo, Statis, other small market cry babies, I DEMAND answers. And I want them right the @#$% now.
2009-2010 NBA Salaries
Cleveland 116 mil
Blazers 84 mil
Memphis 83 mil
Magic 82 mil
Suns 79 mil
TWolves 77 mil
Spurs 77 mil
Lakers 77 mil
Bucks 76 mil
ARE YOU @#$%^&* KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!!!!????????????? I had to listen to all your @#$%&^%$ and THESE are the numbers from ONE year ago??????
So because the Lakers payroll went up from extending THEIR OWN PLAYERS, they are a problem? Is this a joke?
Somebody, PLEASE double check my numbers and tell me I am missing something. Tell me I screwed this all up. Cuz I pulled this from USA Today, so help me God if this is accurate, and you guys were in here runnin off at the God damn mouth over @#$% that isn't even @#$%^&* true.
Don't pull thru here and act like you don't see this @#$% neither, you reply right the hell now. I want answers NOW.
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/basketball/nba/salaries/team
Originally Posted by Blazers21NTNP
Originally Posted by CP1708
Doo, Statis, other small market cry babies, I DEMAND answers. And I want them right the @#$% now.
2009-2010 NBA Salaries
Cleveland 116 mil
Blazers 84 mil
Memphis 83 mil
Magic 82 mil
Suns 79 mil
TWolves 77 mil
Spurs 77 mil
Lakers 77 mil
Bucks 76 mil
ARE YOU @#$%^&* KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!!!!????????????? I had to listen to all your @#$%&^%$ and THESE are the numbers from ONE year ago??????
So because the Lakers payroll went up from extending THEIR OWN PLAYERS, they are a problem? Is this a joke?
Somebody, PLEASE double check my numbers and tell me I am missing something. Tell me I screwed this all up. Cuz I pulled this from USA Today, so help me God if this is accurate, and you guys were in here runnin off at the God damn mouth over @#$% that isn't even @#$%^&* true.
Don't pull thru here and act like you don't see this @#$% neither, you reply right the hell now. I want answers NOW.
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/basketball/nba/salaries/teamThose numbers are terribly wrong. The Lakers' salaries in '09-'10 were over $91 million. They say Bynum made $2,769,300, when he actually made $12,526,998.
They have Wally Szczerbiak, whose contract expired after the '08-'09 season, on the Cavs' payroll for $13,275,000. The Cavs' actual team salaries in '09-'10 were ~$83 million.
Many other errors, but I think you get the point.
Originally Posted by Blazers21NTNP
Originally Posted by CP1708
Doo, Statis, other small market cry babies, I DEMAND answers. And I want them right the @#$% now.
2009-2010 NBA Salaries
Cleveland 116 mil
Blazers 84 mil
Memphis 83 mil
Magic 82 mil
Suns 79 mil
TWolves 77 mil
Spurs 77 mil
Lakers 77 mil
Bucks 76 mil
ARE YOU @#$%^&* KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!!!!????????????? I had to listen to all your @#$%&^%$ and THESE are the numbers from ONE year ago??????
So because the Lakers payroll went up from extending THEIR OWN PLAYERS, they are a problem? Is this a joke?
Somebody, PLEASE double check my numbers and tell me I am missing something. Tell me I screwed this all up. Cuz I pulled this from USA Today, so help me God if this is accurate, and you guys were in here runnin off at the God damn mouth over @#$% that isn't even @#$%^&* true.
Don't pull thru here and act like you don't see this @#$% neither, you reply right the hell now. I want answers NOW.
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/basketball/nba/salaries/teamThose numbers are terribly wrong. The Lakers' salaries in '09-'10 were over $91 million. They say Bynum made $2,769,300, when he actually made $12,526,998.
They have Wally Szczerbiak, whose contract expired after the '08-'09 season, on the Cavs' payroll for $13,275,000. The Cavs' actual team salaries in '09-'10 were ~$83 million.
Many other errors, but I think you get the point.
I don't think it's pre-season rosters, as they have Tracy McGrady on the Knicks--just poor work by USA today. I mean, look at Houston. They paid Yao Ming over $16 millon, and paid Ming Yao over $15 million. Artest and Ariza were teammates apparently, too. I'd think it's safe to assume that there's errors on every team.Originally Posted by CP1708
Alright, thank you for double checking. Bynum signed his extension that year, so we jumped up. This must have been a preseason list then? Hence Wally not coming off their list. I thought 116 was high, but I was assuming they were adding luxury numbers or something. That dollar for dollar stuff.
Is there an error for every team then to make all those team numbers skewed?
I don't think it's pre-season rosters, as they have Tracy McGrady on the Knicks--just poor work by USA today. I mean, look at Houston. They paid Yao Ming over $16 millon, and paid Ming Yao over $15 million. Artest and Ariza were teammates apparently, too. I'd think it's safe to assume that there's errors on every team.Originally Posted by CP1708
Alright, thank you for double checking. Bynum signed his extension that year, so we jumped up. This must have been a preseason list then? Hence Wally not coming off their list. I thought 116 was high, but I was assuming they were adding luxury numbers or something. That dollar for dollar stuff.
Is there an error for every team then to make all those team numbers skewed?
Originally Posted by gllahone84
Damn this dude Lebron need all the help he can get...oh wait he didn't have a true PG last year.
Originally Posted by gllahone84
Damn this dude Lebron need all the help he can get...oh wait he didn't have a true PG last year.
You posted '09-'10 salaries. http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/LAL/2010.html--add those up and see if you get $77 million.Originally Posted by CP1708
Ok, but Basketball reference has the same salary numbers as well. 77 mil for the 2009 team. So unless they pull from USA Today, those numbers have to be coming from somewhere.
You posted '09-'10 salaries. http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/LAL/2010.html--add those up and see if you get $77 million.Originally Posted by CP1708
Ok, but Basketball reference has the same salary numbers as well. 77 mil for the 2009 team. So unless they pull from USA Today, those numbers have to be coming from somewhere.
Originally Posted by Blazers21NTNP
You posted '09-'10 salaries. http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/LAL/2010.html--add those up and see if you get $77 million.Originally Posted by CP1708
Ok, but Basketball reference has the same salary numbers as well. 77 mil for the 2009 team. So unless they pull from USA Today, those numbers have to be coming from somewhere.
Originally Posted by Blazers21NTNP
You posted '09-'10 salaries. http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/LAL/2010.html--add those up and see if you get $77 million.Originally Posted by CP1708
Ok, but Basketball reference has the same salary numbers as well. 77 mil for the 2009 team. So unless they pull from USA Today, those numbers have to be coming from somewhere.
So because of injuries, and dumb teams, the system is fundamentally flawed. You just said this.Originally Posted by Statis22
Cleveland lost their best player.
Portland's best player's knees fell off and now he's stealing money.
Orlando is about to lose their best player.
Memphis has already paid and most likely can't afford one of their best players.
Suns are dumb
TWolves are dumb.
Lakers and Spurs are cool.
Michael Redd has been stealing money for about what 3 years now?
Yea I think that the system is fundamentally flawed. Some teams spent big and still are about to lose their guys. Other paid and because of the salary cap they were unable to rid themselves of those contracts becaus they were guaranteed, like Houston.
So what you're gonna tell me we shouldn't have paid Yao Ming? He was the best center in the league, and were a big market.
You're gonna say Milwaukee shouldn't have paid Michael Redd? Doesn't work that way.
So because of injuries, and dumb teams, the system is fundamentally flawed. You just said this.Originally Posted by Statis22
Cleveland lost their best player.
Portland's best player's knees fell off and now he's stealing money.
Orlando is about to lose their best player.
Memphis has already paid and most likely can't afford one of their best players.
Suns are dumb
TWolves are dumb.
Lakers and Spurs are cool.
Michael Redd has been stealing money for about what 3 years now?
Yea I think that the system is fundamentally flawed. Some teams spent big and still are about to lose their guys. Other paid and because of the salary cap they were unable to rid themselves of those contracts becaus they were guaranteed, like Houston.
So what you're gonna tell me we shouldn't have paid Yao Ming? He was the best center in the league, and were a big market.
You're gonna say Milwaukee shouldn't have paid Michael Redd? Doesn't work that way.
Did you check all the numbers from Basketball-Reference?Originally Posted by CP1708
Mike, like I said, I got that from Bball Reference too, not sure how 2 different sites would have wrong info.
Did you check all the numbers from Basketball-Reference?Originally Posted by CP1708
Mike, like I said, I got that from Bball Reference too, not sure how 2 different sites would have wrong info.
Originally Posted by Blazers21NTNP
Did you check all the numbers from Basketball-Reference?Originally Posted by CP1708
Mike, like I said, I got that from Bball Reference too, not sure how 2 different sites would have wrong info.
'08-'09 Cavs - $91,298,233(http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CLE/2009.html)
'09-'10 Cavs - $83,398,854 (http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CLE/2010.html)
Originally Posted by Blazers21NTNP
Did you check all the numbers from Basketball-Reference?Originally Posted by CP1708
Mike, like I said, I got that from Bball Reference too, not sure how 2 different sites would have wrong info.
'08-'09 Cavs - $91,298,233(http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CLE/2009.html)
'09-'10 Cavs - $83,398,854 (http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CLE/2010.html)