- Oct 10, 2008
- 10,756
- 9,096
So blood just never gonna defend his title?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We all know Dana wouldn't in his wildest dreams. It was probably Dana's idea for the rematch to begin with. If it was Conor's you know that fat bastard agreed with no hesitation
Yeah.. they need to go ahead and strip him of that title if he's not going to defend it.
a downhill gus came alot closer to finishing cormier than jones didYou realize the difference in caliber between a perhaps downhill gus and jones...
It's easier not to fade against gus
I thought jones won clear 4 rounds
Shrugs. My point is it's easier to not fade against Gus than Jones, so I don't buy that as a compelling argument as to why he's improved to the point that I see him beating Jones. That's just me though. Rumble has been known to fade bad himself
a downhill gus came alot closer to finishing cormier than jones did
shamrock and kimbo both tested positive for steroids. ken also tested positive for an opiod.
shamrock and kimbo both tested positive for steroids. ken also tested positive for an opiod.
UFC 197
http://wrestlecrap.com/induction%20files/familymatters/CarlSteve.jpg[/quote]
:lol thanks for that. Brought back memories of TGIF
that Rumble fades thing is so dumb...when besides Dc has he faded in recent years...and that was cuz Dc survived his onslaught and put it to him
Shrugs. My point is it's easier to not fade against Gus than Jones, so I don't buy that as a compelling argument as to why he's improved to the point that I see him beating Jones. That's just me though. Rumble has been known to fade bad himself
I do give DC a solid chance because of Jones' out of cage issues
Nate was right. "They're all on steroids"
anderson silva during his whole dominating run?