- Dec 14, 2004
- 60,034
- 50,948
it was on the cover art on soundcloud
This ***** is the worst. Every five minutes she had to bring up her jacket. She must have had ZERO attention growing up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it was on the cover art on soundcloud
This ***** is the worst. Every five minutes she had to bring up her jacket. She must have had ZERO attention growing up.
Only thing I don't like about Tax is when he has random women in the studio. They never offer anything and I always feel like they're scared to go against him most of the time cuz his jokes are too strong. I don't want to see him really argue but none of the women can keep up. It's like they're eye candy but we can't see them. She doesn't count as a random woman but when he had that **** ISIS lady on I was so weak.
Homegirl from Brooklyn was hilarious who was dissing ISIS she's funny whenever she on the show. She's the female version of Tax straight up I think her name is BKtidalwave she was straight up hilarious
This chick is wild.
Don't even listen to TBI.
Schulz out here defending the armed militia in Oregon and comparing them to Occupy Wall St. and BLM.
I wish someone more capable of taking him to task up there. Dudes got that real veiled 'woe is the white man' mentality at times.
Don't do that fam. You know dang well the only comparison that was made between Occupy Wall St and what's going on in Oregon was in regards to the physical occupation of space. And he acknowledged that if black people chose to occupy any federal land while armed, there would be a completely different outcome. Dude delved into the story more than what the news headlines presented and argued that it may be illegal, but it's commendable because of the cause. That stands to be true for anyone regardless of race.
Don't even listen to TBI.
Schulz out here defending the armed militia in Oregon and comparing them to Occupy Wall St. and BLM.
I wish someone more capable of taking him to task up there. Dudes got that real veiled 'woe is the white man' mentality at times.
He only acknowledged that they were committing a crime after Charlemagne continued to point that out. That wasn't part of his argument. His only real point was 'just because these people are white the media is putting a negative spin on an ARMED MILITIA forcefully taking over a plot of federal land and outright saying that they're ready to die.' How the hell do you put a negative spin on things?Don't do that fam. You know dang well the only comparison that was made between Occupy Wall St and what's going on in Oregon was in regards to the physical occupation of space. And he acknowledged that if black people chose to occupy any federal land while armed, there would be a completely different outcome. Dude delved into the story more than what the news headlines presented and argued that it may be illegal, but it's commendable because of the cause. That stands to be true for anyone regardless of race.
He only acknowledged that they were committing a crime after Charlemagne continued to point that out. That wasn't part of his argument. His only real point was 'just because these people are white the media is putting a negative spin on an ARMED MILITIA forcefully taking over a plot of federal land and outright saying that they're ready to die.' How the hell do you put a negative spin on things?
Don't really care how legitimate the cause is, it's just wrong. Also doesn't matter what color they are, but I don't think there's anything wrong with pointing out how we generally deal with the same type of disgruntled protesting group differently depending on some pretty obvious factors. And it's ridiculous that anyone feels the need to stand up and defend these dudes when they've been allowed to just chill there as the government waits them out.
I'm all for protest. Any kind of protest. Peaceful protest, violent protest. I think they're just going about it the wrong way. I don't think there's much to argue there.
I can concede that race may play a factor subconsciously in my mind.He only acknowledged that they were committing a crime after Charlemagne continued to point that out. That wasn't part of his argument. His only real point was 'just because these people are white the media is putting a negative spin on an ARMED MILITIA forcefully taking over a plot of federal land and outright saying that they're ready to die.' How the hell do you put a negative spin on things?
Don't really care how legitimate the cause is, it's just wrong. Also doesn't matter what color they are, but I don't think there's anything wrong with pointing out how we generally deal with the same type of disgruntled protesting group differently depending on some pretty obvious factors. And it's ridiculous that anyone feels the need to stand up and defend these dudes when they've been allowed to just chill there as the government waits them out.
I'm all for protest. Any kind of protest. Peaceful protest, violent protest. I think they're just going about it the wrong way. I don't think there's much to argue there.
But here's the thing, the argument was didn't begin from the standpoint of how the government is mismanaging the situation on the basis of race. It was explaining the back story of why it's occurring in the first place. The evolved into a matter of "whites get away with ____ but if blacks did _____, there'd be a different outcome". Everyone knows that the be the case, and neither of them argued against that from what I remember. I can recognize that Ctg tried to advance the conversation from a racial basis when it wasn't the intent of the conversation. Can't blame him for addressing the elephant in the room. But when the premise of the conversation was to add context to what's been portrayed in the media, I can't knock Schulz for that either. If you don't object to protest, whether peaceful or violent, then I have a difficult time seeing where your qualms come in with the conversation they had. If it's established that everyone has the constitutional right to protest, wherein lies the issue? It seems as if you're more so upset at the arrogance of white people to exercise that right with a sense of impunity (which this case undoubtedly is), but that's a different conversation altogether and not the one that was had on the show.
I can appreciate a show like tbi because it brings different people with different viewpoints to the table to have a conversation. Whether I agree or disagree with a person's thoughts, I can respect them for voicing their opinion for the sake of hopefully learning something more so than I can respect one that keeps a closed mind.