tmukg21
Banned
- 4,017
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
So which one is it NT, the usa govt ignored all the facts or set up the attack? Seems like they set it up by doing nothing (ignoring the warningsword to the Titanic).Originally Posted by Joseph Camel Jr
I
At the very most, you could argue that Bush & Rice allowed for these attacks to happen, ignoring the data gathered by US intelligence warning of attacks by Bin Laden that would target ""military passenger aircraft" and were "designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities or interests."
The most logical standpoint to take would be that, at worst, they were incredibly negligent.
Even if we had been behind these attacks, the premises seem a little ridiculous. I have no doubt that we invaded Iraq in part because of interests far removed from homeland security, but to say we set up these attacks in order to invade Iraq or Afghanistan seems far-fetched.
You telling me a bunch of Ivy league educated people are this negligent and ignorant
![grin.gif](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.yuku.com%2F%2Fdomainskins%2Fbypass%2Fimg%2Fsmileys%2Fgrin.gif&hash=2f4fe7c43513f6ce8e1496dcfe74034f)