Idk why but this made me laugh
After the verdict, a question that remains is will this verdict be appealed?
Why? If you don't mind me asking...don't want to infringe on your religious beliefs.
This is why I was happy when I found out it was all women.
There was reasonable doubt for sure.
It wasnt about GZ injuries, it was about how GZ felt at that moment.
If he felt threatened then he had the right to shoot.
I just hoped those women could see those lies and say screw reasonable doubt and convict him.
It seems as if they didnt even consider manslaughter
"tonight your going to die today"
This whole talk of feeling threatened has deep rooted psychological implications... There is fear of the black man essentially...don't care how you slice it. I know about the systematic attempts at thwarting a black man's attempt at success, because I lived it for one, and I've seen many fall victim to the traps. It's not hard to do, when you're a descendant of people promised 40 Acres and a mule after slavery but ended up as as sharecroppers in the same cycle of servitude, if not worse. Society at large has not, and will never come to grips with a culture that is so foreign from the status-quo, actually black culture sticks a middle finger up to the establishment. That's where the coolness, and everything else that is emulated derives from. In this case, it was about judgment, not in the sense of fairness applied by the judicial system, but it was a form of judgment based off appearances, a difference in character. Hence, the pictures being shown all across the internet of a young teen growing through his adolescent rebellion phase. How could you feel threatened by an unarmed man to the point of shooting to kill makes no sense to me at all. We have a kid that's dead....I think that's what I'm having a hard time grasping in this thread...dudes talking about self defense as if Trayvon was holding heat or even a box cutter for that matter. How was this even fair? If you can't see that Zimmerman was already mentally inept from the phone calls then I think as a society we're all on different wavelengths, but I thought at least the jury would be able to cut the bs in this whole case regardless of how the prosecution presented it...but come on, you can't have one minority on the jury? Get the **** out of here man...It's 2013. How did that **** even look man... I'm not leaving this up to the prosecution...can't do it at all. I'm not playing, or falling for these little hoodwinked games, and all this twisted rhetoric about the fairness of the justice system. This was clearly a dark moment for America....
if someone could answer this question for me
when did GZ have time to take the safety of his gun and cock it back to load the bullet into the chamber?
now assuming he just had it on him, when did he knowingly take the time out to do this if TM was attacking him?
also assuming the he never had the safety on, again when would he have time to pull his gun out, cock it, and then shoot TM?
I am not a big gun person but I am assuming about 4 seconds max to load the bullet in the chamber without someone attacking you?
America doesn't want to give you full equality. Why? Because it's been a majority white country for all of its existence. Majorities rule the roost. That's just how humanity operates. At the end of the day, majorities do whatever the hell they want because nobody can stop them. Unless the minority can physically impose its will on the minority (Syria, Bahrain,Jordan, etc.)
if someone could answer this question for me
when did GZ have time to take the safety of his gun and cock it back to load the bullet into the chamber?
now assuming he just had it on him, when did he knowingly take the time out to do this if TM was attacking him?
also assuming the he never had the safety on, again when would he have time to pull his gun out, cock it, and then shoot TM?
I am not a big gun person but I am assuming about 4 seconds max to load the bullet in the chamber without someone attacking you?
maybe because a lot of guys on this board can identify with Trayvon?
maybe because a lot of guys on this board can identify with Trayvon?
Great post and I agree...
Makes no sense...doesn't even fit into the actual narrative.
, the first sentence of your post man, OH THE IRONY. Considering how GZ reacted. Lord have mercy. Then you go on and continue further in the same reply to perpetuate this ignorance that TrAyvon (you can at least spell someone's name, surely) was a criminal. Yet we know who had a criminal record in this case prior to the incident. You cannot possibly be this dense, good job trolling though as you've elicited a response from me.
Yo...
Man I been trolling THEE hardest...
kick rocksMan I been trolling THEE hardest...
maybe because a lot of guys on this board can identify with Trayvon?
I was just surprised. Seemed like that trial was just as interesting as this one. Both involved murdered children in FL and the perp ultimately walking.
