- Dec 13, 2018
- 10,957
- 19,975
You do realize that what you feel, tends to disagree with historical accuracy, correct?
HISTORICALLY, people have done some very horrible things in the name of their so called god, without repercussion from said god, who is supposed to be the final arbiter of supposed right? And wrong. Yes, that supposed god is to blame, especially since he has never written anything down himself, in order to prove his existence and authority. If this god exists, why would he allow those sort of people, to take his name in vain?
HISTORICALLY, people have done some very horrible things in the name of their so called god, without repercussion from said god, who is supposed to be the final arbiter of supposed right? And wrong. Yes, that supposed god is to blame, especially since he has never written anything down himself, in order to prove his existence and authority. If this god exists, why would he allow those sort of people, to take his name in vain?