- Aug 4, 2012
- 32,038
- 14,853
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but that's none of my businessnah man. it's not even relevant to the conversations and he literally put it in any post he ever makes.
"nice e30, would be better with a v8 though"
"nice formula 1 car, would have been better with a V8 though"
"oh those are cool rims, but you could have spent that money on a v8"
"nice coffee table but a v8 block with glass on top would be better"
"Oh you like The Walking Dead? might be a good show but i don't watch TV i just go outside and listen to V8 exhaust"
Haha yep, I was waiting for someone to say that when I posted it, you're totally right. Additionally, the impact was offset, and not head on. They definitely set it up so the Bel Air would not fair well.Granted safety features have come a very long way and modern cars are certainly safer than older ones, but that video is extremely misleading. The 1959 Bel Air used an X-Frame, which lacked side rails and always had terrible structural rigidity. Additionally, that car featured in the video had no drive-line further reducing the structural rigidity of an already weak vehicle and causing the entire front end to completely collapse in on itself upon impact. Now I'm not saying old cars are safer than new ones, but they sure did cherry pick the wettest of wet noodles to get their point across .
and with that. you have won the internet for the daybut that's none of my business
that cx5 is modded. stock rims look nothing like that and they changed the grill. mightve even painted inside the headlight a bit. and have u seen the NEW mazada 6? or the 2015? the new 6 is a step up bigtime on the interior. and the exterior gets a good bump tooBahama hahaha
I jus wanted to say the new Mazda are dope. The new 6 Is hot fire. That blacked out cx5 is a good look too although I don't think the stock wheels are that big
why you mad? Cause aint nobody want to get a tatoo of a 4cycl But they willing to get tatoos of v8s?
Oh yeah?why you mad? Cause aint nobody want to get a tatoo of a 4cycl But they willing to get tatoos of v8s?
nah, i don't want to associate with the type of person that would get an engine or car company tattooed on themselveswhy you mad? Cause aint nobody want to get a tatoo of a 4cycl But they willing to get tatoos of v8s?
American V8 is like the drunk uncle in your family. Like yea he's there, but nobody really cares aside from his other alcoholic friends.
You have your euro V12's, high-revving V8s and then your japanese boosted 4-bangers & flat 6s
It's like some lazy fat dude was hired to build an american V8 Vs. Picasso building a british V12.
Not sure if that made any sense to you like it does to me, but yea
dude crying because i love my country and what it stands for
So you saying v12>?I heart you, fam. I owned a jeep myself. (Not a V8, but I still loved it as a daily)
It was more towards the heavy mustang, coupè/sedan american V8 dudes. It's just corny to a certain point.
Especially that "no replacement for displacement" cringe-worthy phrase.
Forgot to mention it was an older black lady whippin that hellcat too. Had to be her husbands or sons or something. Beautiful sight
1. Thats like saying poor people and rich people cant be in the same sentence.What I'm saying is (with all due respect), some cars shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence as others.