- Dec 23, 2003
- 9,421
- 7,194
crcballer55
satan doesn't believe in Jesus. Satan believes he is Jesus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By that rational, Satan wouldn't believe in himself.@crcballer55 satan doesn't believe in Jesus. Satan believes he is Jesus.
I'm not sure I get the point you are making. Just because someone believes they are something, doesn't make it true.@crcballer55 That's not the correct scriptural reference. Satan isn't a demon so he doesn't shudder.
Christianity teaches that satan is a fallen angel that was kicked out of heaven and banished to Earth.
Basically satan was Gods highest angel until he rebelled against God.
http://www.allaboutgod.com/history-of-satan.htm
Christians believe Satan acts as leader of the fallen angels. These demons, existing in the invisible spirit realm yet affecting our physical world, rebelled against God, but are ultimately under His control.
id rather donate to DONDA than a man name creflo...Kanye believes in Jesus if that makes yall feel better.
Using your logic, the better religion won...because anamist gods couldn't protect people from being enslaved?I feel the same way,it's crazy that a lot of them have become some of the most ardent supporters/believers now.Thing I'm tripping on is how people follow a religion that was forced upon their ancestors by those that enslaved them?
Hell the more I thought about it, the fact that my ancestors were animists or perhaps buddhists.
Until they were conquered and Islam was forced upon them.
Likewise I can't understand how so many people never question Christianity when it too was forced upon them.
Using your logic, the better religion won...because anamist gods couldn't protect people from being enslaved?
that basically people believe what they believe because they were dominated.How the **** is that MY logic fam?Using your logic, the better religion won...because anamist gods couldn't protect people from being enslaved?
that basically people believe what they believe because they were dominated.
one could argue that your being dominated inspite of your beliefs speaks to the inferiority of your beliefs; that is if we look at the merit of a belief being purely on how it was delivered and not its substance. No?Right, so how the **** does that fit into your subsequent statement?that basically people believe what they believe because they were dominated.
one could argue that your being dominated inspite of your beliefs speaks to the inferiority of your beliefs; that is if we look at the merit of a belief being purely on how it was delivered and not its substance. No?
wow.... so according to YOUR logic.... white people are superior because europeans have dominated most of the world.one could argue that your being dominated inspite of your beliefs speaks to the inferiority of your beliefs; that is if we look at the merit of a belief being purely on how it was delivered and not its substance. No?Right, so how the **** does that fit into your subsequent statement?that basically people believe what they believe because they were dominated.
I'm trying to figure out what his point is because I'm lostwow.... so according to YOUR logic.... white people are superior because europeans have dominated most of the world.one could argue that your being dominated inspite of your beliefs speaks to the inferiority of your beliefs; that is if we look at the merit of a belief being purely on how it was delivered and not its substance. No?Right, so how the **** does that fit into your subsequent statement?that basically people believe what they believe because they were dominated.
no, my point is thatNo.one could argue that your being dominated inspite of your beliefs speaks to the inferiority of your beliefs; that is if we look at the merit of a belief being purely on how it was delivered and not its substance. No?
That's quite a jump to make.
Fact is throughout history religion was spread through conquest.
Miss me with that "substance" BS.
By YOUR logic nobody should of ever had any religion forced upon them because the SUBSTANCE of the scripture should have been enough to compel them.
someone originally stated that people (specifically black people) don't realize that they believe what they believe because they where enslaved.I'm trying to figure out what his point is because I'm lostwow.... so according to YOUR logic.... white people are superior because europeans have dominated most of the world.one could argue that your being dominated inspite of your beliefs speaks to the inferiority of your beliefs; that is if we look at the merit of a belief being purely on how it was delivered and not its substance. No?Right, so how the **** does that fit into your subsequent statement?that basically people believe what they believe because they were dominated.. So what I'm getting from what he's saying is that certain beliefs are deemed inferior when they can't be forced upon more people through force?
thats a fact....someone originally stated that people (specifically black people) don't realize that they believe what they believe because they where enslaved.
now retrace and follow...
well if you say that the 'only reason' someone believes something is because they were dominated into believing it, that is pretty much attacking the substance (quality...superiority etc) of their beliefs. No?thats a fact....someone originally stated that people (specifically black people) don't realize that they believe what they believe because they where enslaved.
now retrace and follow...
how does that relate to anything being "superior" or "inferior"?
well if you say that the 'only reason' someone believes something is because they were dominated into believing it, that is pretty much attacking the substance (quality...superiority etc) of their beliefs. No?