everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
Trump is going to prove the 'both ppl are the same, what is our vote going to do' ppl wrong, unfortunately.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Even if you didn't want to vote FOR Hilary, you could have used your vote to vote AGAINST Trump
That was Hilary's whole gameplan broEven if you didn't want to vote FOR Hilary, you could have used your vote to vote AGAINST Trump
Took me nearly 1.5 hours to get home yesterday due to these dumb *** protestors. People were vandalizing cars and local businesses. I hate Trump as much as the next guy but dudes need to chill.
A non vote is essentially a vote for the victor who happens to be TrumpEven if you didn't want to vote FOR Hilary, you could have used your vote to vote AGAINST Trump
That was Hilary's whole gameplan bro which is why she lost. She tried to play off this kinda mentality which ultimately backfired on her.
No man, 100,000,000 people didn't voteBut that's how Gary Johnson got all those votes ended up costing Hillary in the end
Ok, got it. It's just every 4 years it's the same **** "We gotta vote (insert party here) we can think about change next election.
IDK, every time I think about the current political climate, I see old *** boomers w/ the Herman Cain smirk
Took me nearly 1.5 hours to get home yesterday due to these dumb *** protestors. People were vandalizing cars and local businesses. I hate Trump as much as the next guy but dudes need to chill.
What were they protesting? And why are they considered dumb, if they're protesting something that will have a negative effect on their lives, why is that dumb?
Even if you didn't want to vote FOR Hilary, you could have used your vote to vote AGAINST Trump
Lesser of 2 evilsEven if you didn't want to vote FOR Hilary, you could have used your vote to vote AGAINST Trump
I just don't get this logic.
The logic is that Trump will be objectively worse than a Clinton presidency would have been. @Rexanglorum I believe put it like this in football terms. Sometimes its best to take the 3 points instead of going for it on 4th down and be risky.I just don't get this logic.Even if you didn't want to vote FOR Hilary, you could have used your vote to vote AGAINST Trump
Ari Berman
[emoji]10004[/emoji]
@AriBerman
Voter turnout in Wisconsin at lowest level in 20 years & down 15% in Milwaukee, where 70% black voters live …
11:54 AM - 10 Nov 2016
Lord bless their heart. This is the crap I was talking about in my class today like people really do not understand these things. The ignorance is bafflingBrah, the 2004, 2008, and 2012 election were not like that for Dems.
Dems main problem too is that their base believes they only need to show up every 4 years, and not in midterms. Liberals, dems, black people want change, then show up then to vote. Midterms and special elections is what stripped Obama of all his political power and killed any chance or bigger change happening. I know you know this, but some many other don't
I got friends and coworkers worried about Trump and I tell them "just be ready to vote Dem in 2 years" and their response is "Hold up, I thought elections were every 4 years?"
Me....
Even if you didn't want to vote FOR Hilary, you could have used your vote to vote AGAINST Trump
I just don't get this logic.
The logic is that Trump will be objectively worse than a Clinton presidency would have been. @Rexanglorum
I believe put it like this in football terms. Sometimes its best to take the 3 points instead of going for it on 4th down and be risky.
Even if you didn't want to vote FOR Hilary, you could have used your vote to vote AGAINST Trump
I just don't get this logic.
The logic is that Trump will be objectively worse than a Clinton presidency would have been. @Rexanglorum
I believe put it like this in football terms. Sometimes its best to take the 3 points instead of going for it on 4th down and be risky.
I believe the saying was for progressive: "Bernie was a touchdown, Hillary is a field goal, Trump would be a pick 6"
So progressive that are mad they didn't get Bernie should just take the points and work to make the DNC more progressive for the future.
Yeah thats what he said. Both analogies apply but that was the OG oneI believe the saying was for progressive: "Bernie was a touchdown, Hillary is a field goal, Trump would be a pick 6"The logic is that Trump will be objectively worse than a Clinton presidency would have been. @RexanglorumEven if you didn't want to vote FOR Hilary, you could have used your vote to vote AGAINST Trump
I just don't get this logic.
I believe put it like this in football terms. Sometimes its best to take the 3 points instead of going for it on 4th down and be risky.
So progressive that are mad they didn't get Bernie should just take the points and work to make the DNC more progressive for the future.
Lesser of 2 evils
It's done. It's over with. A WS is now running a WS country. Now we know where we really stand.
It's done. It's over with. A WS is now running a WS country. Now we know where we really stand.