***Official Political Discussion Thread***

No, I gave it as a resort to issue that I find important related to black plight.

When you gave issues that affected lower-income black people.

I’m fully aware that revisionist history plays in your favor due to the tide of leanings in this thread.

What you and B boris proclaim happened in the past is taken as fact with little scrutiny.

But it simply isn’t the case.
The narcissist playbook. Deny what others say. Insist that everyone else is actually the problem.
 
dwalk31 dwalk31 since you claim criminal justice reform is such a big issue for you, I am sure you are outraged by this news, and affect your decision in November, right?...

https://www.vox.com/2020/2/5/21124047/trump-speech-sotu-criminal-justice-record

The problem, however, is that the Department of Justice has “attempted to block hundreds of eligible beneficiaries” and send those released back behind bars, according to the Sentencing Project.

It may not be too surprising considering that Attorney General William Barr had expressed his concerns about the First Step Act behind closed doors, according to the Washington Post. The publication found that Barr thought the early release could drive up crime numbers and put the administration in a bad light.

As a result, the department has tried to freeze applications or re-incarcerate former inmates by setting higher standards for their release. Rather than judge their eligibility based on how much crack they possessed when convicted, DOJ argued that they should consider the largest amount of crack the inmate may have admitted to owning. Several federal judges have rejected this interpretation of the law, although at least five have agreed, according to the Post. Some have simply withheld their decision — further delaying the process.
 
To be clear, you think paying higher taxes saves these same earners...more?

Also what does middle earner mean?
3b4e2cce845ef52b05ed1b0b316082bb.png


Also, that's a strawman argument. There are multiple ways to execute tax cuts, trickle-down is the most extreme version. Higher taxes can in fact result in an overall cost decrease for the average American if it is used to lower the cost of other expenses such as healthcare.
It is asinine to look at taxes in a vaccuum. Less tax good, more tax bad is archaic thinking.
 
Last edited:
Higher taxes can in fact result in an overall cost decrease if it is used to lower the cost of other expenses such as healthcare.

Even if true, this is a losing argument to voters, imo. But we will see in November.
 
Someone calling me a rapist supporter presumes that someone is guilty of rape. And that I support them.

Me saying I don’t think we can label someone a rapist unless they are proven guilty of rape does not make me a rapist supporter. Do you think it does?

Because that’s what occurred in here. Roy Moore was accused of raping young women. I said that I think there’s a presumption of innocence until he’s proven guilty.

The response was that
I support Roy Moore and little girls being raped.

That is nonsensical to the point of absurdity and comical.

For you to pretend that somehow I’m making a lapse in logic, ostensibly because you disagree with my politics, is intellectually dishonest. And you know it.


Please actually respond to the bolded question.

YIKES

You and ninjahood ninjahood would make great friends.
 
Unless I missed something that article was about William Barr and the justice department.
So now after all this the DOJ is now somehow independent from Trump. You really want people to buy that Barr is doing this against the wishing of Trump?

Please don't try to insult my intelligence like this.
 
So now after all this the DOJ is now somehow independent from Trump. You really want people to buy that Barr is doing this against the wishing of Trump?

Please don't try to insult my intelligence like this.

See you’re adding that one little piece that wasn’t in the article...at the direction of Trump.

You literally just made that up.

I thought the justice department was independent of the White House. Is that not the case?
 
Young CHUD: Economics says low taxes are always good and raising minimum wage is bad. Liberals like AOC should learn Economics

The young CHUD learns that AOC took more economics classes then him and that the economics professoriate is to the left of the median voters

Young CHUD: Economics is all theory. What's important is that my dad said that minimum wage is bad for his employees at the company I work at.
 
Young CHUD: Economics says low taxes are always good and raising minimum wage is bad. Liberals like AOC should learn Economics

The young CHUD learns that AOC took more economics classes then him and that the economics professoriate is to the left of the median voters

Young CHUD: Economics is all theory. What's important is that my dad said that minimum wage is bad for his employees at the company I work at.

Thats why I defer to the infinite wisdom of Rusty in matters of economics.
 
It is so interesting how as soon as the the black liberal left the oval office conservatives warmed up to deficit spending, stopping austerity, and keeping interest rates low.

It is like they are using the same policies the attacked liberals for advocating for, to prop up this economy, and to cover up the facts their right wing economic policies don't work.
 
Last edited:
Thats why I defer to the infinite wisdom of Rusty in matters of economics.
I know you are trolling but conservatives really need to stop the struggle libertarian economics and crony capitalism. Listen to liberal progressives on economics because if **** doesn't turn around soon the economic collapse will happen in our lifetime. And the only acceptable economic systems to people after that will be full blown socialism. And communist will have a say in things too.

After that you, me and rexanglorum rexanglorum all gonna be on the same farm co-op, picking avacadoes, calling each other comrade. I know I can handle that, but I know your *** gonna be miserable because the group interest, and public ownership, won't allow you to get a second hunt to use as a rental property.

So yeah, you conservatives really need to starting embracing da New Kenyesian Economics now before it is too late.
 
Last edited:
It is so interesting how as soon as the the black liberal left the oval office conservatives warmed up to deficit spending, stopping austerity, and keeping interest rates low.

It is like they are using the same policies the attacked liberals for advocating for, to prop up this economy, and to cover up the facts their right wing economic policies don't work.

****, Trump has even lobbied the Feds to go into negative interest rate territory like some parts of the EU.

Anytime you can cut taxes and lower interest rates in response to a "booming" economy so when we do eventually go into a recession we have absolutely zero tools at our disposal to increase and incentive spending you have to do it. Its simple economics
 
I know you are trolling but conservatives really need to stop the struggle libertarian economics and crony capitalism. Listen to liberal progressives on economics because if **** doesn't turn around soon the economic collapse will happen in our lifetime. And the only acceptable economic systems to people after that will be full blown socialism. And communist will have a say in thing too.

After that you me and rexanglorum rexanglorum all gonna be on the same farm co-op, picking avacadoes, calling each other comrade. I know I can handle that, but I know your *** gonna be miserable because the group interest, and public ownership, won't allow you to get a second hunt to use as a rental property.

So yeah, you conservatives really need to starting embracing da New Kenyesian Economics now before it is too late.

Who’s trolling now?

But the issue on the left is messaging.

Let’s say I’m with you on the math.

The groups I’m in are like okay... we benefit personally for another 4 years. When the various bubbles burst we can come in and buy in low. Rinse. Repeat.

Is that line of thinking wrong from a numbers perspective?

I guess that is the question and I don’t think the left does a very good job of explaining another alternative. The sky is falling routine is old.

And the utopian promises either 1) seem like they would take longer than 4-8 years to achieve; or 2) be met with gridlock in congress.
 
If the Democratic party’s mission is to convince people that spending less on taxes is a bad thing, I think they should rethink the strategy.

I’m no economist. I’m sure that Rusty is right on some academic theoretical level.

But voters see the numbers in accounts. So it’s a tough sell to try and use data and historical figures to tell people they are worse off.

You can be right with a losing strategy.

Get the **** out of here, the average middle class families tax bill went down $1,050 a year or about $20 a paycheck per wage earner. That's considering only individuals who claimed the standard deduction on their 2017 tax returns. People who live in states where property and state taxes are much higher than the rest of the nation got hammered by the new law's cap of a $10,000 for SALT related deductions. If you itemized prior to 2018, it is likely that your tax bill didn't go down much if any at all. Mine went down $450 because I itemized in previous years.

Additionally people who filed head of household also got screwed because they didn't get an increase in their standard deduction from prior year, but lost any exemptions for any qualifying dependents.

The only people who got a real benefit from the tax cuts were the rich and corporations. Even the stuff that was supposed to pay for the tax cuts like the implementation of Global Low Taxed Intangible Income was drafted under an incredibly flawed understanding of the tax law because the basic assumption was all companies who have subsidiaries in foreign jurisdictions do so for the sole purpose of evading US tax which simply is not true. In practice, most of the revenue raisers that they put in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ended up getting offset by a Foreign Derived Intangible Income deduction which republicans vastly underestimated the potential impact.

If the tax cuts were so great for the average person they wouldn't be talking about doing it again.
 
Last edited:
Messaging? How about people educate themselves? Oh college is too expensive? How about we make it affordable? Oh taxes would have to be increased? Slash wasteful spending instead!

But no, conservatives have been brainwashed from decades of propaganda and willful ignorance. Anybody getting educated outside the coal mines makes them a liberal elitist and cant be trusted, and anybody with an (R) next to their name is the only ones who can be trusted because they say so. And here we are in the nth iteration of trickle down economics, seeing it fail worse and worse every time. BUT DA COFFERS IS BOOMING. **** that, tell the coffers to pay you a living wage once your truck is automated and you're out of a job. Or your manufacturing job that was promised to you by the president just doesn't show up in your small Wisconsin town.

BuT wE bEnEfIt FoR tHe NeXt FoUr YeArS.

Do you? Do you see wage growth outpacing the cost of living? Good for you! Me too! But the majority of people in the country DONT. Including those closest to me. So when Donald tells everybody the economy is THE GREATEST ever, we dont believe him. Because we're rational and we understand simple economics. But too many people dont, including almost all of his uneducated supporter base. So what do they do? Ignore educated people who deliver clear and concise messaging, and reelect a ******* king moron.
 
Back
Top Bottom