wavy daddy
Banned
- 4,667
- 2,148
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2016
Fittna be ww3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Whew. That oil money bout to Crazy for Putin.....Trump get that 19.5%. Sanctions lifted. Putin free to drill all over.
Trillerson confirmed.
Yeah we are going to war with themWorld News TonightVerified account@ABCWorldNews 43m43 minutes ago
National Security Advisor Michael Flynn says U.S. "condemns" recent actions by Iran: "As of today, we are officially putting Iran on notice"pic.twitter.com/eSV25up0dA
Millitary industry complex back at it again
Iran has an actual capable military.
AP PoliticsVerified account@AP_Politics 7m7 minutes ago
BREAKING: President Trump has left the White House on Marine One on an unannounced trip, White House has not disclosed his destination.
AP Politics Time to see Comrad Putin....and Ca$h in.
interesting pair of articles from nyt and wapo arguing that gorsuch may not be that awful and that it may suit the Democrats better to focus on blocking someone like sessions:
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/31/opinion/why-liberals-should-back-neil-gorsuch.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...t-they-should-take-it/?utm_term=.e1df27b19f3e
The Post reported yesterday that Jeff Sessions not only helped plan Trump’s first week in office but also wanted Trump to go a lot farther — and is the “intellectual godfather” of some of the ugliest facets of Trumpism. If the Democrats are going to muster the will and political capital to tank a nominee and send the Trump administration a message, Sessions seems like a far better target.
I agreeinteresting pair of articles from nyt and wapo arguing that gorsuch may not be that awful and that it may suit the Democrats better to focus on blocking someone like sessions:
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/31/opinion/why-liberals-should-back-neil-gorsuch.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...t-they-should-take-it/?utm_term=.e1df27b19f3e
The Post reported yesterday that Jeff Sessions not only helped plan Trump’s first week in office but also wanted Trump to go a lot farther — and is the “intellectual godfather” of some of the ugliest facets of Trumpism. If the Democrats are going to muster the will and political capital to tank a nominee and send the Trump administration a message, Sessions seems like a far better target.
What are the chances of the Dems blocking Sessions?
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/317379-gop-senator-to-vote-no-on-betsy-devos"I do not intend to vote on final passage to support Ms Devos to be secretary of Education," she said.
She added that the DeVos's nomination was a "personal" decisions and that her office had been flooded with calls from constituents opposing Trump's pick.
"I have heard from thousands, truly thousands, of Alaskans who shared their concerns," she said.
"I do not intend to vote on final passage to support Ms Devos to be secretary of Education," she said.