- Oct 13, 2001
- 161,083
- 143,029
I get this but the reason I call it a net positive is cause of the societal impact not the individual impact. Will it be a net positive on people eating better and healthier lifestyles? No. Will it be a net positive as far as less obese people meaning less people who get diseases and other health complications that come from obesity and the societal and individual strain from healthcare costs we have to do to help those people? Yes.
As far as long term effects it’s still early days on this and like other medications there’s always gonna be word of mouth case by case stories of it not working well or someone having a bad experience but we haven’t seen that on the large scale with this and that’s a good sign. Theres even studies being done right now to see if it can help people with alcoholism and other addictions we could be on the cusp of a real game changer.
We might be playing the semantics game but what you explained is why I called it a GROSS (before deductions/taxes (side effects) pay.
I just think it's short sighted to only look at the ways it can positively reduce the obesity numbers because again, most humans (let alone AMERICAN humans) aren't going to use it in conjunction with proper lifestyle changes.
But we will have to #WaitAndSee , i don't have faith in folks to use it in any other way than a magical fat reducing pill.