His posts, it added, “can have real-world consequences."
fortune.com
Even a broken Grok is right twice a day.
Weird how rightwing “populists” always seem to leave the masses worse off.
Remember that a lot of reactionaries consider EVERYTHING they see on TV to be a deliberate cultural product of “the left.”
They picture Democratic politicians, activists, the HR department at their job, and the entire entertainment industry as one singular thing. A singular entity conspiring to make people not laugh at their 1990’s era jokes.
So when they complain about “the left,” they mostly are uncomfortable seeing queer and non white characters on TV. What they are actually asking for is for society to wholesale return to 1992 (when the media voter still had good knees).
BTW I do think that a lot of TV does suck. Most of the decline can be attributed to the proliferation of nepo babies, 3rd and four 4th generation in many cases.
Another factor is that mid tier writers used to do a workman like job and turn out respectable action flicks and raunchy comedies. Now, everyone is expected to grapple with big social questions and how it interacts with our protagonist’s inner most thoughts. Great writers can pull this off, but not everyone is David Simon.
There’s also an over reliance on lore and Easter eggs/other fan service, and it comes at the expense of story telling.
Lastly, CGI has sucked the life out of movies.
We need to fix those four things but keep the onscreen diversity. Trans and non white folks should be the lead in credulity straining action flicks and silly coming of age summer movies.
The morning after the election, I wrote:
“There’s going to be a lot of finger pointing over the coming days and months, and people will invariably seize the opportunity to claim that if only everyone had done exactly what
they wanted, and centered
their desires, we wouldn’t be in this mess. Some will unfairly scapegoat those on the margins, with relatively little individual or collective power, rather than issuing proportionate culpability to the majority of Trump supporters and enablers.”
That has certainly been on full display this week.
The Democratic Party has spent decades developing a brand as spineless, ineffectual, unprincipled and insincere. Ask a low information voter about Democrats, and they’ll describe a party that’s been captured by corporate interests, is fundamentally the same as their opponents, inevitably capitulates when push comes to shove, and only pays lip service to the issues that matter when it’s time to pander for votes. This is why so many people have found demands for “tangibles” appealing. They want instant gratification in exchange for their votes, not empty rhetoric and vague promises.
Trump did not run on unification or moderation. He ran on division, resentment, and retribution. The Trump “policy platform” is essentially the Joe Rogan diet: nothing but red meat and ketamine. He catered almost exclusively to his base. There was no post-convention shift to center. He closed with watermelon “jokes.”
Republicans can run on selfishness. They can run on tradition, not change. They naturalize inequality and hierarchy. They run on distrust in the very concept of collective governance and the public good. They cater to the most privileged and powerful. These are, sadly, structural advantages.
At a time when the Democratic coalition is fraying, when voters have grown impatient with being asked to wait years for investment in public works and green energy products to pay dividends or stave off future disaster, when they question the extent to which the party is actually committed to them beyond vote pandering and empty symbolism, when they’re fed up with their votes being taken for granted as soon as the primary season ends and Brat Summer turns into Triangulation Autumn, I cannot overstate how little interest I have in the tantrums of moderates who insist that they weren’t sufficiently centered.
Let them tell it, and liberals are snowflakes who need to stop policing others’ speech and attitudes. But also, we need to police
their speech and attitudes in the hopes that we can properly pander to the least informed, least motivated, least reliable portion of the electorate.
What better way to win back faith in the concepts of equality and diversity than to demand the party throw its most vulnerable constituencies to the wolves?
If you’re driven to domestic terrorism by the “threat” of lady Ghostbusters and Black mermaids, the last thing you can credibly claim is that “people are making too big a deal about diversity.” Clearly, representation matters if the Marvel Cinematic Universe plunging from 80% White to 78% White is perceived as an existential crisis.
Likewise, I will not take seriously the demands of centrists to monopolize for themselves a party that relies on a diverse coalition to wrest control from an entrenched but dwindling supremacist plurality.
For all the talk of the dangers to sports and athletes, no mentions of:
One SEC program reportedly pulled offers from 5 female swimmers two weeks before signing day - and they weren't the only ones.
swimswam.com
On top of sports programs getting cut all the time
I think we can stop dignifying the fiction that trans panic really stems some deep concern for the integrity of historically underfunded women’s sports competitions.
At heart, high school sports are an after school club activity. The overwhelming majority of participants do not go on to become professional athletes, or even scholarship athletes. They learn teamwork and leadership skills. They develop self-confidence and resilience. They improve their physical fitness and learn productive training habits.
If you say that trans kids shouldn’t be allowed to participate, even if you think you aren’t doing so as part of a broader push to exile them from public life, you are demonstrably more concerned with the traditions of amateur competition than in the wellbeing of these students.