- Jun 28, 2004
- 6,971
- 17,042
Is that a problem?
I mean, we have Trump voters who are asserting that he won't take away the ACA, despite having tried multiple times and not having a concrete plan 9 years after entering politics.
You said it was unrealistic to expect people to change the way they get their news, and I said that in the last 40 years, we've collectively changed the way we get information, from exclusively print media to digital media and everything in between.
Like this?
Some screenshots even had page numbers to make it easy for people to dig further if they wanted to.
They still didn't believe.
Who reads Robert Reich’s tweets though?
(Edit: not dissing RR, I follow him. But his audience are mostly socialists and progressives)
The most impactful parts of project 2025 should be spoken by the candidate whenever they have a platform like a convention speech or an interview.
Preferably with a little mustard on top like mentioning project 25, its impact, and highlighting a MAGA Chud on Twitter who is using an important project 2025 bullet point to threaten women with SA.
Again, like with Limbaugh calling women, who get birth control, sluts.
But the Harris campaign considered things like that to be gauche and uncivil.
That only works against a Mitt Romney.
Donald Trump
- moved to the center on abortion
- moved to the center on entitlements
- actually campaigned for the votes of black Americans
- campaigned for non college educated Latinos.
2012 Obama ran against a Mormon nerd/plutocrat. It's not gunna work on Trump.
Sure, Romney was an easier target.
But that means that Dems should decided not “go high” against Trump, who goes way lower than Romney.
We’ve ran the civility and appeal to Republicans playbook three times now and absent a plague breaking out on his watch, Trump is pretty much bullet proof against this outdated 1990’s triangulation style politics.
Last edited: