- 145,982
- 177,157
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2010
You were making fun of his division record like Cam has a tough division himself . Guess no name was a bit disrespectful but u understood my point. At least they don't have impact players going down week by week
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You were making fun of his division record like Cam has a tough division himself
Because he doesn't even have top 5 QB numbers statistically and his defense is winning games. You gonna have a league MVP of someone that's not in the top 5 of the major QB stats?
When Cam makes his receivers better instead of dudes saying his receivers arent making HIM better then ill talk about it.
Brady had no name receivers.
Theyre just household names now BECAUSE of tom.
Like Kurt Warner said the award should never be solely of stats. Stats play a part but shouldn't be the determining factor. I would venture to say that Palmer and Dalton easily have better offensive talent around them then Newton and Brady. Out of those QBs which one means the most to the teams offensive success and that's why it's Cam and Tom and only should be between those two IMO. Palmer will get some votes tho. And if I'm not mistaken Matt Ryan stats have been elite/Top tier for QBs for most of the season and we all know he shouldn't be in the MVP discussion but he would if it was based purely off stats.
look up mvp every year. they put up ridiculous stats..... these dudes not being realistic.Who said MVP is stats alone? What's New England and Arizona's record? Are they like 6-5 or something? Stats are huge part of the MVP award. Let's not play dumb because some of y'all want Cam to win it so bad.
A QB should win MVP that's not top 5 in passing yards, rating, TDs or INTs?
AP should also be getting some mvp love too,the Vikes are on top of their divison with him being a big reason why
I'm mostly looking at the big difference in team performance since he's been back. They're winning games they would've lost last year and they genuinely have a shot at the playoffs,no one really expected that from them so fast. No coincidence that AP's on pace for his 2nd best season ever at 30AP should also be getting some mvp love too,the Vikes are on top of their divison with him being a big reason why
So is one of the league's easiest schedules though. They've only beaten one team with a winning record, and it was Atlanta.
I don't know about the rest of y'all, but after tonight's game... can't wait for the Browns/Ravens tomorrow!!!
View media item 1808102
where did this screencap come from? forgot...
He is having a great under-the-radar season, though I don't see him as an MVP candidate.I'm mostly looking at the big difference in team performance since he's been back. They're winning games they would've lost last year and they genuinely have a shot at the playoffs,no one really expected that from them so fast. No coincidence that AP's on pace for his 2nd best season ever at 30
Brady's been beating up on overrated divisional opponents for years but that should never be held against him. AP is for sure right up there with Brady and Cam.
teddy is just mediocre..... yeah ap does deserve mvp consideration.AP is on pace for 1700 yards and Teddy has been mediocre this year, he has 8 TDs and 7 INTs
AP def. deserves MVP talk even though he won't win, your QB and RB should not have the same amount of TD's