- Jun 1, 2011
- 107,063
- 79,470
I did read that wondering if he was talking about you or Chris Paul
I think he's gonna be a really good pick-up for them. Of course I did say that same thing about him on the Rockets too
Official NBA 2012-2013 Season Thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- Status
I did read that wondering if he was talking about you or Chris Paul
I think he's gonna be a really good pick-up for them. Of course I did say that same thing about him on the Rockets too
- May 19, 2010
- 4,750
- 1,407
Appreciate the love fam, and someone please tell me when people giving their opinion about an improving young,deep athletic team is hype. Lol.
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
You're tripping, 04 and 05 they were really solid.The Salt^, I still remember when we cooked the Pacers too in the Finals, they ain't been the same since
solarius49
Banned
- Jul 13, 2004
- 6,989
- 1,286
The Salt^, I still remember when we cooked the Pacers too in the Finals, they ain't been the same since
No salt, I'm just sayin in your reference to last season, the Lakers werent particularly better than the Clips.
And the Pacers were still VERY good after that 2000's Finals run. The end of the line was in 2004 after Malice in the Palace...
After those 2000 Finals the Pacers went
42-40
48-34
60-21
44-28
until the Malice in the Palace incident, when most of the impact players were suspended....so I dont think the Lakers had much to do with it
- Jul 3, 2012
- 12,744
- 2,371
You're tripping, 04 and 05 they were really solid.The Salt^, I still remember when we cooked the Pacers too in the Finals, they ain't been the same since
Did they make the Finals??
solarius49
Banned
- Jul 13, 2004
- 6,989
- 1,286
You're tripping, 04 and 05 they were really solid.The Salt^, I still remember when we cooked the Pacers too in the Finals, they ain't been the same since
Did they make the Finals??
What does that have to do with anything? The Lakers didnt make the Finals last year, does that mean they werent a solid team? What kind of logic is that......has to be trolling
Oh and since the Yanks got swept, are you going to remove them from your sig?
Last edited:
- Sep 1, 2004
- 25,508
- 667
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
You're an idiot. Figures 'your teams' are are the Lakers, Yankees, USC, and Cowboys. Surprised you're not a Real Madrid and Detroit Shocks fan tooDid they make the Finals??You're tripping, 04 and 05 they were really solid.The Salt^, I still remember when we cooked the Pacers too in the Finals, they ain't been the same since
- Jul 3, 2012
- 12,744
- 2,371
they ain't been the same sinceThe Salt^, I still remember when we cooked the Pacers too in the Finals, they ain't been the same since
You're tripping, 04 and 05 they were really solid.
Did they make the Finals??
What does that have to do with anything? The Lakers didnt make the Finals last year, does that mean they werent a solid team? What kind of logic is that......has to be trolling
Oh and since the Yanks got swept, are you going to remove them from your sig?
Can u read, I did say they ain't been the same since....
- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,800
- 129,092
My original point was to remind quik similar things were said last season about the Clippers-Lakers, but the Lakers still managed to finish with the better record.
You won't get an argument from me about both teams losing in the second round (though the Lakers were more competitive in their series in comparison to the Clippers).
Last edited:
mjshoefanatic
Banned
- Jul 7, 2004
- 9,355
- 361
- Jul 3, 2012
- 12,744
- 2,371
You're an idiot. Figures 'your teams' are are the Lakers, Yankees, USC, and Cowboys. Surprised you're not a Real Madrid and Detroit Shocks fan tooYou're tripping, 04 and 05 they were really solid.The Salt^, I still remember when we cooked the Pacers too in the Finals, they ain't been the same since
Did they make the Finals??
Look whose talking....The Kings really though...and then you trying to sell madden on ur sig you a clown
mjshoefanatic
Banned
- Jul 7, 2004
- 9,355
- 361
My original point was to remind quik similar things were said last season about the Clippers-Lakers, but the Lakers still managed to finish with the better record.
You won't get an argument from me about both teams losing in the second round (though the Lakers were more competitive in their series in comparison to the Clippers).
by one game
Also, what happened to that competitveness in the 2011 playoffs LAL vs DAL?
Last edited:
solarius49
Banned
- Jul 13, 2004
- 6,989
- 1,286
they ain't been the same sinceThe Salt^, I still remember when we cooked the Pacers too in the Finals, they ain't been the same since
You're tripping, 04 and 05 they were really solid.
Did they make the Finals??
What does that have to do with anything? The Lakers didnt make the Finals last year, does that mean they werent a solid team? What kind of logic is that......has to be trolling
Oh and since the Yanks got swept, are you going to remove them from your sig?
Can u read, I did say they ain't been the same since....
But they were very good after that. Better even considering they were 56-26 that year, and 60-21 a couple years later.
But by your logic, any team that didnt make the finals isnt a solid team. The Lakers would be very disappointed in you
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
Oh you're right, folks should only cheer for winners right. I am now a Lakers fan.Look whose talking....The Kings really though...and then you trying to sell madden on ur sig you a clownYou're an idiot. Figures 'your teams' are are the Lakers, Yankees, USC, and Cowboys. Surprised you're not a Real Madrid and Detroit Shocks fan tooYou're tripping, 04 and 05 they were really solid.The Salt^, I still remember when we cooked the Pacers too in the Finals, they ain't been the same since
Did they make the Finals??
- Jul 3, 2012
- 12,744
- 2,371
My goodness y'all need a chill pill, I specifically said they ain't been the same since they went tonthe finals doesn't mean I'm trashing em yes they had solid seasons in 04 and 05 but they wasn't in the finals compared to the Reggie millers jalen rose n mark Jackson squad that faced that lakers....I'm I getting my point across now
- Jul 3, 2012
- 12,744
- 2,371
Oh you're right, folks should only cheer for winners right. I am now a Lakers fan.You're an idiot. Figures 'your teams' are are the Lakers, Yankees, USC, and Cowboys. Surprised you're not a Real Madrid and Detroit Shocks fan too [/QUOTEYou're tripping, 04 and 05 they were really solid.The Salt^, I still remember when we cooked the Pacers too in the Finals, they ain't been the same since
Did they make the Finals??
Look whose talking....The Kings really though...and then you trying to sell madden on ur sig you a clown
Son I can't talk bball with you homie
mjshoefanatic
Banned
- Jul 7, 2004
- 9,355
- 361
solarius49
Banned
- Jul 13, 2004
- 6,989
- 1,286
You mean they're not the same because a few of their best players retired? And they're not the same even though they had a better record in 2003-2004 when Mark Jackson and Jalen Rose were already retired?
Jamaal Tinsley
Reggie Miller
Ron Artest
Al Harrington
Jermaine O'Neal
- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,800
- 129,092
Sigh.
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
- May 25, 2001
- 22,149
- 16,403
Ibaka shooting 3s this yr
Harden, if we don't extend him within the next week, is looking poised to have a start to the season similar to what Russ had (hasn't had a good game since the Spurs series, not counting meaningless buckets in game 5 of the finals) last season prior to getting his extension where he was just TERRIBLE. On the other hand, Ibaka is playing more free and confident than ever.
Harden, if we don't extend him within the next week, is looking poised to have a start to the season similar to what Russ had (hasn't had a good game since the Spurs series, not counting meaningless buckets in game 5 of the finals) last season prior to getting his extension where he was just TERRIBLE. On the other hand, Ibaka is playing more free and confident than ever.
Last edited:
- Jul 3, 2012
- 12,744
- 2,371
You mean they're not the same because a few of their best players retired? And they're not the same even though they had a better record in 2003-2004 when Mark Jackson and Jalen Rose were already retired?
Jamaal Tinsley
Reggie Miller
Ron Artest
Al Harrington
Jermaine O'Neal
We're they better than the team that went to the finals vs the Lakers? NO...enough with the foolery y'all ain't been the same since
D
Deleted member 38182
Guest
Because I'm a fan of a ****** team?Son I can't talk bball with you homie
Playing with Pau all summer must have rubbed off on himIbaka shooting 3s this yr
solarius49
Banned
- Jul 13, 2004
- 6,989
- 1,286
You mean they're not the same because a few of their best players retired? And they're not the same even though they had a better record in 2003-2004 when Mark Jackson and Jalen Rose were already retired?
Jamaal Tinsley
Reggie Miller
Ron Artest
Al Harrington
Jermaine O'Neal
We're they better than the team that went to the finals vs the Lakers? NO...enough with the foolery y'all ain't been the same since
Obviously you didnt watch any of the games lol...but ok
I would assume that a team who won 61 games is ATLEAST as good as not better as a team who won 56 games.
Last edited:
- Status
