antidope
Supporter
- Jan 2, 2012
- 63,514
- 68,037
That hurts man, you guys will be back next year. Full season of healthy Dirk I have no doubt in my mind.And with that, the Mavs have been eliminated from the Playoffs before it started.
First time that's happened in 13 years.
Tons of small mistakes that added up in a big way.
Props to the Lakers for closing it down.
Said it to CP and NaS on Twitter, along with the Warriors, I want the Lakers to do well. Said it at the beginning of the year. I want Nash to win.
I really do think that two fouls even when not in the penalty is enough, maybe if theyre in the penalty add an extra shot if both are made, or something. I really dont like the idea of getting possession afterwards, but I totally understand the rationale behind it, I couldnt challenge a single thing you just said.Getting the ball back is the only way to prevent defenders from doing it. You have to put that penalty there in order to prevent it from happening.The fact that they get the ball back is my real issue with it though, it makes the penalty far too steep.Let's examine that play. Lillard was beat on the play and Kobe was clearly going to score a 2-point basket. Instead of attempting to play D, Lillard just fouled him. If they called a reach-in, it rewards the defensive player for not attempting to play D and it takes away the 2 points that would have most certainly been scored.Can someone explain what's the point of having the clear path foul? Why is it considered special and not a simple reach-in foul?
Giving 2 FTs + the ball prevents defenders from gaining an advantage by fouling.
If the offense didn't get the ball back, how would it be any different from a regular foul? Players would be coached to foul from behind on EVERY breakaway and games would turn into a hack + FT fest.