- Jul 3, 2012
- 12,744
- 2,371
Kobe now has the Flu...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok and if we had complete knowledge of what their entire careers would turn out to be would you still pick Shaq? Everytime a player is ranked their entire career is taken into account except for Shaq's. Its always "Prime Shaq>>>>>>>>>>" and thats the end of the line when it comes to him. It really isnt a fair way to go about it, we can do that for anyone and it would make them seem like Gods. If I just took T-Mac's prime years and used those to rank him what would that look like?
I am well aware. Its still my honest opinion and I gave my reasoning for it.
OK.
Why is he even starting?
Clippers went down hill when he came back
We were talking about prime/peaks, not careers. And yes I'd still take a rookie Shaq over a rookie Timmy Duncan if I was starting a team today, knowing what we know now.Ok and if we had complete knowledge of what their entire careers would turn out to be would you still pick Shaq? Everytime a player is ranked their entire career is taken into account except for Shaq's. Its always "Prime Shaq>>>>>>>>>>" and thats the end of the line when it comes to him. It really isnt a fair way to go about it, we can do that for anyone and it would make them seem like Gods. If I just took T-Mac's prime years and used those to rank him what would that look like?
Harden got the whole team throwing up BsLeggo Rockets!!
We were talking about ranking players all time and thats how we got here. You're entitled to your opinion but I think taking Shaq over Duncan knowing full well how the careers will pan out is crazy. Duncan is still putting up numbers on par with his averages, Shaq couldnt even play 10 minutes in the NBA right now.We were talking about prime/peaks, not careers. And yes I'd still take a rookie Shaq over a rookie Timmy Duncan if I was starting a team today, knowing what we know now.Ok and if we had complete knowledge of what their entire careers would turn out to be would you still pick Shaq? Everytime a player is ranked their entire career is taken into account except for Shaq's. Its always "Prime Shaq>>>>>>>>>>" and thats the end of the line when it comes to him. It really isnt a fair way to go about it, we can do that for anyone and it would make them seem like Gods. If I just took T-Mac's prime years and used those to rank him what would that look like?
the hell
LeBron hasn't committed a foul in 6 games in a row again?
Exactly. Of course he couldn't, he's 41 years old. When he was 36 like Duncan is now he had a pretty good season.Shaq is also 5 years older, so why should we expect him to be playing ten minutes?
Lob City!!!!!!
LeBron hasn't committed a foul in 6 games in a row again?
Dudes were saying Wall was a bum .
Wiz playing good ball since he's been back
Earlier in the year.LeBron hasn't committed a foul in 6 games in a row again?
Tim Duncan is better than Shaq, if only for the fact that he actually can still play at this point and had way more highly productive years. That Shaq decline is akin to 50 Cent after the Massacre
Exactly. Of course he couldn't, he's 41 years old. When he was 36 like Duncan is now he had a pretty good season.
I think Shaq's decline is being overstated.