- Jan 4, 2013
- 3,317
- 301
5s are my most uncomfortable, 7s are bout top 3 if not number 1
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,086
- 8,627
I think VI is the most uncomfortable but I got a pair of 02 dark charcoal VIIs and they are pretty comfortable
- Feb 8, 2009
- 20,070
- 10,959
VII's are uncomfortable? 
I don't know if they messed the formula up, but the 2010 and back pairs were nice.
My 2000 and DMP VI's were comfortable in my opinion.
Insert the Will Smith "No" gif on V's being anything less than greatness.
I don't know if they messed the formula up, but the 2010 and back pairs were nice.My 2000 and DMP VI's were comfortable in my opinion.
Insert the Will Smith "No" gif on V's being anything less than greatness.
- Jan 4, 2013
- 3,317
- 301
I'm sorry I might has messed that up when I meant top 3 I meant to say most comfortable lol you can see the confusion and my intent a little re reading it
VII's are uncomfortable?
My 2000 and DMP VI's were comfortable in my opinion.
Insert the Will Smith "No" gif on V's being anything less than greatness.
- Feb 21, 2008
- 1,806
- 474
Last edited:
- Jul 20, 2002
- 5,722
- 2,235
Chicagos receive too much hate imo.
dave whites are terrible and are the worst hi top 1s imo.
dave whites are terrible and are the worst hi top 1s imo.
- Jan 4, 2013
- 3,317
- 301
Was just the tongue on the chicagos leather could've been better if it was more like the celtics leather but I still have my pair I'm not hating
- Feb 13, 2013
- 1,071
- 981
fixed lol
- Oct 24, 2010
- 94,423
- 33,488
the only hate the chicagos get is the quality.
so dont get the reasoning that last year they released all these NA 1's with decent quality and the first 1 to drop was the chicago and of course it was terrible materials and the jumpman.
they gave Celtics, Highlights reels, and knicks.... a bunch of damn no name, ugly and riridulous NON OG colors the better quality and NA treament. makes no sense.
- Jul 20, 2002
- 5,722
- 2,235
I agree that they should have been og. But the quality isn't as bad as it is made out to be. I have worn my pair countless times and have no problems.
- Feb 8, 2009
- 20,070
- 10,959
Aye, leave the Knicks out of this, b
Oh, okay. Now we're on the same page
- Nov 26, 2003
- 2,407
- 905
If i wanted to swap tongues on a size 9, what's the max size difference I can get on the donor pair? Half a size? A full size?
Anyone know where to get pick up cheap Highlight Reels?
Highlight Reels are everywhere, scattered across the web. I see a few in the size 9-10 range on eBay. Don't go up or down if you don't have to. You can use an 8.5 or 9.5 and still be fine for a size 9.
Speaking worst Jordan 1s, I'm gonna have a lot of folks disagree with me but I'm going out on a limb...
I CANNOT stand Jordan 1 mids, so all those colors are the worst. Part of their iconic greatness is the height. '85 and '94 got inches on '13 too!
- Jan 4, 2013
- 3,317
- 301
No a lot of people including myself don't do mids but even I must say a couple of them new ones are crafted very well
- Nov 28, 2012
- 278
- 65
picked these up as part of a trade the other day. truly understand when ppl say they dont make em like they used to. my buddy has a beat pair and they still look good. glad i dumped my bred 1s
- Jan 4, 2013
- 3,317
- 301
Im sorry but I'm not trading my black/red ones for these just me. I also wouldn't let go of 11' white cement 3s for 88s so yea it's weird I guess
- Feb 8, 2013
- 1,908
- 652
Why would you not trade the WC for the 88's?
OG vs retro
OG vs retro
- Feb 8, 2009
- 20,070
- 10,959
I mean, they're not really "OGs"...
- Jan 4, 2013
- 3,317
- 301
Just my preference I don't really mind the Jumpman on 3-6 because that's where it was used mostly anyway.
- Nov 26, 2003
- 2,407
- 905
Another week has passed and now that we're almost into March, May is only a couple months away. Does anyone have any idea or any insight into these: Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG 555088-123? JB is keeping these under wraps.
We've seen everything from this calendar, but those.
If JB is coordinating their releases based on colors, we could be getting a non-OG color mix of wht/infrared-blk.
Barons-theme:
9's/1's
Wht/Blk-Concord
11 lows, 2s
Infrared
11 lows/2s, maybe 1s?
We've seen everything from this calendar, but those.
If JB is coordinating their releases based on colors, we could be getting a non-OG color mix of wht/infrared-blk.
Barons-theme:
9's/1's
Wht/Blk-Concord
11 lows, 2s
Infrared
11 lows/2s, maybe 1s?
- Jan 4, 2013
- 3,317
- 301
Tired of infrared colors on any jordan but VI Smh
- Nov 28, 2012
- 278
- 65
i dunno, the '14 VI dont look any shade of infrared to me but maybe thats just my eyes. hope they dont make the black IR that shade
DJ Shift
formerly dj5h1ft
- Jul 19, 2008
- 1,757
- 1,174
airgolden2123
I remember someone saying that 123 is an Infrared color code so it could be possible. I'd like to see them retro one of the Metallics properly. 
- Sep 24, 2013
- 8,726
- 3,487
For the love of God please let's keep that color debate out of here.
airthompson
Staff member
- Jul 30, 2008
- 13,828
- 9,634
That was me. I'm almost certain they'll be a infrared color. Several infrared color Jordan's shared the 123 color code.
Yeah it's your eyes. They're the exact same color as the Infrared Air Max 90s. People are just used to seeing a darker shade cuz the '00 & '09 retros. But the '14 is def Infrared.
Last edited:
- Jul 19, 2012
- 5,350
- 4,579
Was just thinking.. Nike doing this thing right now being more Eco friendly I think? by not providing lace bags. If JB does this.. Would make it one way harder to tell apart Retails from GMs huh? Hope they don't.
