- 11,959
- 6,203
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
Pretty sure there will be a Chase logo someplace on that jersey 
Official 2017 Knicks Offseason thread, Phil Jackson gone
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pr0phecy718,
- Start date
- 10,246
- 8,501
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2014
V.I.M
- 49,029
- 61,330
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
If we do have a sponsor it'll either be Chase or MTA
- 73,449
- 100,257
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
The MTA would be appropriate since we're always broken down & behind schedule
- 74,771
- 24,167
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
And we have trains run on us regularly
- 12,362
- 7,870
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2006
- 73,449
- 100,257
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
Wonder if Rose is bringing da sex belt to Cleveland
- 10,246
- 8,501
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2014
Speaking of Cleveland, Now word is coming out that they wouldn't even take Melo for Kyrie, only KP. They're trying to save face since Melo doesn't want to go there now.
- 76
- 46
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2017
**** it lets just keep melo
- 123
- 39
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2017
How many of yall are in favor of keeping melo?
- 76
- 46
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2017
Bro u know for those trash *** trade offers we been getting I would say lets keep him!
- 123
- 39
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2017
Definitely interested in seeing how things would turn out with Frank, Melo, Willy, THJR, and new & improved KP now that the triangle is gone
- 21,285
- 20,791
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
Attachments
- 23,772
- 10,533
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2011
I'm not. No appeal in an aging star with a roster that is in the development stage.
- 76
- 46
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2017
That's true but theres even less appeal in losing that star to get lesser talent for that roster in development stage..so if Melo is such a hindrance to the team like you guys make it out to be then its a case of pick yous poison..trade him for less or keep him? I rather get the less damaging of the two
- 123
- 39
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2017
I knew I couldn't be the only one. Idk why ppl are stressing trading Melo so much when we're not getting any value in return, he gives us more value as a Knick..nothing out there worth getting so if thats the case just keep him..
- 73,449
- 100,257
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
Quick look at our new blue jerseys from 2K18. Looks like no real differences except the shoulder piping going all the way around.
- 35,255
- 26,908
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
Keep Melo
- stuck in mediocracy, with a first round playoff exit at best
- draft in the 12-15 range
- trade talk and distractions all season long
- more jab step, jab step, pump fake, massage ball, jab steps
Lose Melo
-proper rebuild like GS, Sixers, and Thunder did it
-draft in the 3-10 range
-gives more time for the young guys to play/grow together
-no distractions throughout the year (can focus on basketball instead of BS media stuff)
- stuck in mediocracy, with a first round playoff exit at best
- draft in the 12-15 range
- trade talk and distractions all season long
- more jab step, jab step, pump fake, massage ball, jab steps
Lose Melo
-proper rebuild like GS, Sixers, and Thunder did it
-draft in the 3-10 range
-gives more time for the young guys to play/grow together
-no distractions throughout the year (can focus on basketball instead of BS media stuff)
- 123
- 39
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2017
On point
- 76
- 46
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2017
You're assuming way too much plus Melo will most likely defer more to KP now. I think KP has proven himself to melo and earned his trust more. Plus all that drama was mostly due to Phil u can't put that on melo and we would STILL have that young core to develop with melo
- 35,255
- 26,908
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
Melo will never defer to KP. 95% of the distraction was Phil's fault.
Next years draft is very top 5-7 heavy. With Melo we'll lose out. Again. You keep him, you dont make playoffs, even if you do you'll lose in 1st round, AND you get a worse pick.
There's literally no reason to keep him. The negatives outweigh the positives by alot.
Next years draft is very top 5-7 heavy. With Melo we'll lose out. Again. You keep him, you dont make playoffs, even if you do you'll lose in 1st round, AND you get a worse pick.
There's literally no reason to keep him. The negatives outweigh the positives by alot.
- 26,036
- 19,373
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2003
i get you don't want melo on the team but if it means trading for ryan anderson here its a pointless trade and makes us worse
- 123
- 39
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2017
You're basically saying lets lose Melo now to tank and build through the draft.. if we suck so much then we should be able to do that with or without Melo so whats the difference? Lol..plus if we improve and make the playoffs we would be able to attract free agents. You need to understand Melo has been dealing with Phil's BS for about 4 yrs...revolving door of coaches, triangle triangle triangle, bad trades, bad management, bad system, of course you would see him as a lesser talent in a situation like that but Melo is a beast we should keep him now that Phil and his triangle are gone and KP is slowly turning into an all star
- 35,255
- 26,908
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
I hope Perry Mills is smart enough to not take back Ryan Anderson. Unless muliple unprotected draft picks are involved like JRS said
- 35,255
- 26,908
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
We've never attracted a top free agent. Before or during the Phil era. I don't see what will change now.
You guys need to realize that everytime we've went the FA route we lost.
You guys need to realize that everytime we've went the FA route we lost.
