- Jul 29, 2005
- 37,831
- 15,643
JR Smith or THJ? He said young core, which would include THJChandler, Bargs, and Amare are more of an asset than Jr.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
JR Smith or THJ? He said young core, which would include THJChandler, Bargs, and Amare are more of an asset than Jr.
Conditional pick? Under what condition?I want to sign Love, forget a trade.
But the way things are going, it just smells like the Wolves are going to have to trade him. They'd have no choice. (Melo type of situation)
The most I'd give for him is Stat, Shump (or conditional 1st rounder/second rounder). I wouldn't want to let go of Chandler. Think a front court of Melo, Love, and Chandler would work well.
Conditional pick? Under what condition? . The Knicks don't have a 1st until 2018 from what I remember, ain't nobody got time for that
Wat?THJ is a valuable knicks asset. he can run the floor and shoot 3s. hes also getting better on defense. trading him would be a mistake. shump is still under contract and isnt even making 2mil a year. he can be the bruce bowen of the knicks. even though jr is inconsistent, hes still the 2nd scoring option, which im not too mad at. he shouldve picked up where he left off last year by driving to the rim. 2015 will be a much better year because they get to shed almost 45mil in cap from stat, tyson, and bargs. IF melo stays, hes gonna have to accept less than 20 mil a year if he wants the team to have enough cap to sign good players. he cant pull a kobe and hope that his team will be able to contend with a bunch of randoms.
He's not coming here. From his POV, it's a lateral move. Especially with the coaching and Carmelo situation being unstable atm. Yeah, they have to trade him not sure if it would be here though.A conditional pick, I don't know. Whatever would seem logical. It's not like the Wolves have many choices, they're desperate.Conditional pick? Under what condition?. The Knicks don't have a 1st until 2018 from what I remember, ain't nobody got time for that
This trade can very well happen my man. The Wolves have to trade Love. Whether that's the Knicks - who knows, but they have to get rid of him or lose him for nothing.
He wants out and he wants out NOW. He's been voicing his displeasure with the Wolves for the last three years. He's pissed and his patience has worn out. I don't blame him one but. He's busting his *** for nothing. The Knicks might make a play for him, but I think they will wait on this Melo situation to play out. If Melo leaves, then I think Love becomes the #1 priority, and it should. I can't see Love and Melo on the same team. It doesn't work imo.regardless of where hes traded, its gonna be a lateral move. whichever team he goes to, theyre gonna have to give up a lot to get him. granted, hes gonna be a FA after this season, so almost anything is better than nothing. love did say he wants to play for the knicks or lakers. honestly, i think going to la would be worse. they dont have a coach, they dont really have a roster, because most, if not all, of the team was on 1 year deals, and kobe is eating too much of the cap. whos to say that kobe is actually gonna come back and play. look what happened to drose. if i were love, id just wait til 2015 where he has options, versus demanding a trade.
Love and Melo can't co-exist. I don't see it. Let's just say it were to happen, a really good PG is needed, I don't see that scenario here. Love is possible if Melo is out.
name me a time where Carmelo was efficient and effective without a point guard. I'll wait.Differences is we'll have a system, not just iso ballLove and Melo can't co-exist. I don't see it. Let's just say it were to happen, a really good PG is needed, I don't see that scenario here. Love is possible if Melo is out.
name me a time where Carmelo was efficient and effective without a point guard. I'll wait.
Assuming Melo will stay AND buy into the system. By all accounts it's an intricate system that can't be dumbed down if you want to run it effectively. If Melo stays, I think it will show his true basketball IQ honestly. You're right, you don't need a big name PG for it to run effectively. For all intents and purposes you would need a PG who is a "game manager" for lack of a better term. I'm not projecting anything for this team at this point, I'm guessing like everyone else. But I will say building a team around Melo is like building a team that fit Allen Iverson. Put players around him that can do really well what he can't do. Get better rebounders, passers, team defenders, and dudes that hustle so that responsibility doesn't fall on him and he gets constant blame. His job is to get buckets. No more, no less. He CAN do that for you consistently.Because we need a PG don't mean we should not go after a quality big men. We don't have any either.name me a time where Carmelo was efficient and effective without a point guard. I'll wait.
If Phil is looking to bring his style to NY, we don't need an all star/ superstar caliber PG.
A solid pass first, defensive PG would do the job. Phil has how many ring with who Steve Kerr, Derek Fisher as PG ?
Wing and bigs are critical in the triangle.
Sign or trade for K. Love we'll still have a nice amount to build a roster next year.
I never said a good PG isn't needed just don't agree that they can't coexist.