- Sep 5, 2012
- 4,467
- 1,493
Can someone give a look at my pair and let me know if they're legit. Just posted in the Legit Check section, thanks guys!
Nike Air Jordan 1 "Chicago" - May 30, 2015. (LEGIT CHECK IN 1st POST)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by geraldg2309,
- Start date
getemchavez
Banned
- Dec 1, 2012
- 2,342
- 1,252
Nah
my intentions were to help individuals in this thread with legit preorders for a fair price
id rather disguise myself as a patron and lead NTers in the right direction than post false/GM sites like 80% of NTers
because of this, a few nters came up with their pairs @gil23 and others
your issue is clearly something personal like many others have mentioned
i havent posted pics because i refuse to feed into your BS
Last edited:
- Sep 5, 2012
- 4,467
- 1,493
- Dec 19, 2013
- 10,478
- 9,125
I know. You report and backtrack.
You came to their defense and said you would post pics. No forced you to say that.
But keep on shucking and jiving bro.
More than happy to sit down and drink with you in AZ.
- Jul 20, 2012
- 477
- 215
I agree with @CharmCityKid. The sidestepping is what has me curious. But at this point it's a lose-lose for @GetemChavez. If he continues to avoid posting pics, then it looks like he's got something to hide. But if he does post pictures, enough time has passed where there's no real direct chain of custody to prove the pics that he does post are in fact retail store pairs vs. kixsquare pairs.i'm on no one's "side," but i see it like this...
there was allegedly a discrepancy with kixsquare pairs and chavez said not to question kixsquare. he also said he had 4 kixsquare pairs and 4 retail pairs and that he would post pics to dispell the rumors. he then proceeded to never post pics which is why he is being questioned.
sh*t, after all the back and forth, i wanna see the damn pics myself.
then he proceeds to post pics of the boxes of 2 retail pairs, but still no comparison shots. this is questionable movement, although the pics won't necessarily prove anything.
The allegations of @GetemChavez's affiliation with P4P is relevant since someone may infer P4P gets its supply from kixsquare, an online retailer with questioned/uncertain legitimacy. So, we should be careful what we say.
Not taking sides either. I appreciate @Shoeducator
- Jan 27, 2012
- 16,006
- 4,734
So ya went from backpedaling to throwing out the life rafts 
View media item 1492608
If he sinks, he sinks
View media item 1492608
If he sinks, he sinks
- Nov 21, 2012
- 2,392
- 1,092
So Ndc dropping these soon with the ip's being banned?
- Aug 9, 2013
- 2,534
- 295
Sorry noob question whats ip and why does that have anything to do with snkrs?
- Jun 12, 2012
- 1,334
- 208
nothing with snkrs. has to do with people using atc services.
- Aug 9, 2013
- 2,534
- 295
Ahh okay I can't remember when was the last time I successfully cop something online
Definitely good news
getemchavez
Banned
- Dec 1, 2012
- 2,342
- 1,252
lose/lose for me? Haha
nah man, see that's where you have it twisted
It's a win/win for me because at the end of the day I have my pairs
Not only do I have my pairs, but I also succeeded in securing pairs for NTers as well as ooping a pair to @theLtrain (which is what this community is supposed to be about)
While I was doing this, the majority of this thread was caring about themselves and trying to scoop up their only pair
I have NOTHING to prove to ANYONE
Like I mentioned before, people are worried about my Kixsquare orders more than I'm worried about my own Kixsquare orders!
Last edited:
kilroythedon
Supporter
- Feb 20, 2013
- 23,187
- 22,078
Feel like at least two more Nike drops before we see the chicagos
getemchavez
Banned
- Dec 1, 2012
- 2,342
- 1,252
I would like to see Nike ship their stock to outlets and have them launched that way
randomly
- Aug 9, 2013
- 2,534
- 295
I expect a random drop of chicagos
- Apr 22, 2013
- 1,513
- 1,961
An IP (address) is Internet Protocol address. It's essentially the ID of who is contacting a server, in this case, Nike's servers.
Doesn't really have anything to do with SNKRs, more the exchange of carts from one IP to a different IP (i.e. cart services).
- Jan 2, 2007
- 9,189
- 1,135
Hell no.
getemchavez
Banned
- Dec 1, 2012
- 2,342
- 1,252
- Feb 6, 2011
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Jan 2, 2007
- 9,189
- 1,135
That is NOT true. Only people who are lucky to live near destination spots that have Nike outlets that would get shoes like this, win out. Other people will not. If these shoes are online, and Nike does it's job in protecting real consumers from missing out on a pair due to ATC and Bot loaded parties, then that is as fair as it can be given the circumstances.
- Feb 15, 2014
- 300
- 48
Flight club raised prices to $600
getemchavez
Banned
- Dec 1, 2012
- 2,342
- 1,252
Why would I be lying about this...n you know damn well that's not true
Online is a bust
Where I'm from, the FCFS is legit as can be
I dont know about the rest of you but I'm saying thats what I would feel most comfortable with
- Jul 20, 2012
- 477
- 215
I agree. The NDC tweet did say the inventory would be going to retail stores, but it just seems like such chaos if it's true. It would be nice though.
- Feb 15, 2014
- 300
- 48
What I'm guessing is with Nike and the cancelled releases they will just drop like a restock page almost with a bunch of shoes on it
- Jan 2, 2007
- 9,189
- 1,135
Yeah but that's from an individual perspective. From a general perspective, it makes more sense to allocate the inventory through online to appease people in places that don't have these types of outlets.
