- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
there should be a separate thread for anyone that doesnt want to tank the seasonWe have fewer Tank for Wiggins folks than peeps still tryna win games, so no, not full yet, not eem close.
I asked...
View media item 800264
[:: LAKERS 2014 THREAD | POLL: Who Should Coach Next Year? ::]
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by licensed to ball,
- Start date
View media item 800264
- Aug 2, 2008
- 37,562
- 13,058
Kaman to Warriors
Pau to Suns
Blake to Wizards
Meeks to Bobcats
Get those 4 done. You could pretty much guarantee top 5 pick. Get another 1st. Get two seconds. Get under the luxury tax.
Best player we'd get out of these deals would be Anthony Tolliver.
Pau to Suns
Blake to Wizards
Meeks to Bobcats
Get those 4 done. You could pretty much guarantee top 5 pick. Get another 1st. Get two seconds. Get under the luxury tax.
Best player we'd get out of these deals would be Anthony Tolliver.
Last edited:
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,384
- 40,868
- May 3, 2013
- 8,790
- 1,989
Goddamn
- Aug 2, 2008
- 37,562
- 13,058
View media item 800367
Selling low.
But getting out of the luxury tax, and getting what would be current the 29th, 41st & 46th pick.. Is long term thinking.
Last edited:
- May 3, 2013
- 8,790
- 1,989
I mean I agree with you completely.Goddamn
Selling low.
But getting out of the luxury tax, and getting what would be current the 29th, 41st & 46th pick.. Is long term thinking.
but the fact that Pau once netted us Chris Paul.... oh wait..
but how Pau is only worth the 29th pick
- Aug 2, 2008
- 37,562
- 13,058
They won't trade Kobe, Marshall, Kelly, Sacre, Swaggy, X, Farmar.. Those guys are pretty much off the table. Simply for the fact (with the exception of Kobe), they are cheap to keep. Also they won't return nearly what they can produce in the terms of Swaggy & Farmar.
Wes could be a throw in somewhere. But more than likely is with the first group.
Meeks maybe. Hill maybe. Two guys that the Front Office could try to hold out for more, and end up with nothing. I think Hill would be more likely of the two that Mitch holds out for more, and ends up finishing the season in LA.
Blake, Kaman & Pau strong possibilities.
Nash, I'm sure they would love to dump on someone else, but couldn't for anything. Mitch needs to beg Jerry West..
Wes could be a throw in somewhere. But more than likely is with the first group.
Meeks maybe. Hill maybe. Two guys that the Front Office could try to hold out for more, and end up with nothing. I think Hill would be more likely of the two that Mitch holds out for more, and ends up finishing the season in LA.
Blake, Kaman & Pau strong possibilities.
Nash, I'm sure they would love to dump on someone else, but couldn't for anything. Mitch needs to beg Jerry West..
Last edited:
- Oct 8, 2005
- 13,424
- 4,833
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,384
- 40,868
Last edited:
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,384
- 40,868
thisExplain
I was excited when barnes and klay came up in rumors for dwight last year
i wouldve taken bogut and either klay or barnes ( preferably klay)
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,010
- 31,672
Well she looks fun.
Who do those funbags belong to?
Who do those funbags belong to?
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,010
- 31,672
Essential, CP, P... how does the draft work again with the early picks? More losses lands you more ping pong balls for like 1-13 or something, right?
Then it goes by record after that?
No?
Then it goes by record after that?
No?
- Sep 25, 2004
- 8,932
- 3,515
only 1-3. then the rest fall into place by record.
- Aug 2, 2008
- 37,562
- 13,058
More losses = more chance to get in the top 3 picks of the lottery.
Picks 1-3 are the only ones really determined by the ping pong balls.
If pick 1-3 were like from 7th, 8th, 12th worst records then 1-3 would get pick 4-6, rest of the picks go by record.
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,384
- 40,868
i thought the teams that didnt make the playoffs have a chance a scoring the #1 pick. with the team having the worst record of those teams having the best chances and the best record of non-playoff teams having a slight chance at getting the #1 pick
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,010
- 31,672
OK, two questions.
#1. Can you trade a potential 1-3?
#2. What if I traded you my top 5 pick next year... then I don't get a top 5 pick next year? Like I make the playoffs or something?
#1. Can you trade a potential 1-3?
#2. What if I traded you my top 5 pick next year... then I don't get a top 5 pick next year? Like I make the playoffs or something?
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
I'm still having difficulty deciphering how the whole lottery thing works.
Can someone please explain the pick 1-3 thing again? I'd like to understand this better. How exactly does the lottery work
Can someone please explain the pick 1-3 thing again? I'd like to understand this better. How exactly does the lottery work
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,384
- 40,868
seriously, someone drop some knowledge on how protected picsk work too.
is it that if i trade you my top 5 protected pick, you only get it if it is 6 ^
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
This is one time that I'm looking forward to a CP essay.
Let it rip, CP.
Educate us gramps.
Let it rip, CP.
Educate us gramps.
- May 28, 2013
- 3,249
- 199
I believe its computer assigned permutations of #s 1-14...the bucks will get 250 of 1000 combinations and so on. They draw 3 combos and those tms with those combinations get the first 3 picks. The rest goes by record.
For ex......if the computer assigns the lakers 4,1,11,7.....and the 1st drawing is that combination, lal gets the first pick and the tm with the 3rd worst record can have no better than the 4th pick unless their assigned permutations draws 2nd or 3rd.
For ex......if the computer assigns the lakers 4,1,11,7.....and the 1st drawing is that combination, lal gets the first pick and the tm with the 3rd worst record can have no better than the 4th pick unless their assigned permutations draws 2nd or 3rd.
- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,862
- 129,184
He's not that good, if he's even good at all.
Everybody got suckered into his hype after he played a dozen good games during the playoffs after a decent regular season during his rookie year.
1. Yes. But since the Lakers traded away last year's first round pick they have to wait until Draft night to trade this year's first round pick. So they have to actually make the pick (meaning the other team tells them who to pick) then trade that player's draft rights to said team.
2. They already traded next year's 2015 pick to the Suns in the Nash trade. But to break it down, most teams put some kind of protection when trading future first round draft picks. For instance, the Lakers get to keep their 2015 pick if it falls in the top five next year. If it lands at six? It goes to the Suns.
Just laugh to hide the crying.
- Aug 2, 2008
- 37,562
- 13,058
That's right
Doesn't really work that way. You normally trade a pick without knowing where it will land up. You can leave it unprotected, meaning wherever you end up, the other team gets it. Or it is protected meaning it falls in a certain range you keep it.
Let's say I trade you a first round pick, I miss the playoffs, but it has a top 5 protection. If I get pick 1-5, the pick stays with me. 6-13 pick goes to you.
If I keep the pick, depends on what the protect is next year, normally it would be less protected, instead of top 5 this year, if I keep it, next year it might be top 3 protected.
Last edited:
- Oct 8, 2005
- 13,424
- 4,833
